1: % Template article for preprint document class `elsart'

2: % SP 2006/04/26

3: 

4: \documentclass{elsart}

5: 

6: % Use the option doublespacing or reviewcopy to obtain double line spacing

7: % \documentclass[doublespacing]{elsart}

8: 

9: % if you use PostScript figures in your article

10: % use the graphics package for simple commands

11: % \usepackage{graphics}

12: % or use the graphicx package for more complicated commands

13: % \usepackage{graphicx}

14: % or use the epsfig package if you prefer to use the old commands

15: % \usepackage{epsfig}

16: 

17: % The amssymb package provides various useful mathematical symbols

18: % \usepackage{amssymb}

19: \usepackage{graphicx, subfigure}

20: \usepackage{psfrag}

21: 

22: % The lineno packages adds line numbers. Start line numbering with

23: % \begin{linenumbers}, end it with \end{linenumbers}. Or switch it on

24: % for the whole article with \linenumbers.

25: % \usepackage{lineno}

26: 

27: % \linenumbers

28: \begin{document}

29: 

30: \begin{frontmatter}

31: % Title, authors and addresses

32: 

33: % use the thanksref command within \title, \author or \address for footnotes;

34: % use the corauthref command within \author for corresponding author footnotes;

35: % use the ead command for the email address,

36: % and the form \ead[url] for the home page:

37: % \title{Title\thanksref{label1}}

38: % \thanks[label1]{}

39: % \author{Name\corauthref{cor1}\thanksref{label2}}

40: % \ead{email address}

41: % \ead[url]{home page}

42: % \thanks[label2]{}

43: % \corauth[cor1]{}

44: % \address{Address\thanksref{label3}}

45: % \thanks[label3]{}

46: 

47: \title{NMscatt: a program for calculating inelastic scattering

48:  from large biomolecular systems

49:  using classical force-field simulations}

50: 

51: % use optional labels to link authors explicitly to addresses:

52: % \author[label1,label2]{}

53: % \address[label1]{}

54: % \address[label2]{}

55: 

56: \author[nic]{Franci Merzel\corauthref{cor}},

57: \ead{franc@cmm.ki.si}

58: \author[ill,delft]{Fabien Fontaine-Vive} and

59: \author[ill]{Mark R. Johnson\corauthref{cor}}

60: \corauth[cor]{Corresponding authors.}

61: \ead{johnson@ill.fr}

62: 

63: \address[nic]{National Institute of Chemistry, Hajdrihova 19, 1000

64:   Ljubljana, Slovenia}

65: \address[ill]{Institute Laue Langevin, BP156, 38042 Grenoble cedex

66:  9, France}

67: \address[delft]{Radiation, Reactors and Radionuclides Department,

68:   Faculty of Applied Sciences, Delft University of Technology,

69:   Mekelweg 15, 2629 JB Delft, The Netherlands}

70: 

71: \begin{abstract}

72: Computational tools for normal mode analysis, which are widely used in

73: physics and materials science problems, are designed here in

74: a single package called \texttt{NMscatt} (Normal Modes \& scattering)

75: that allows arbitrarily large systems to be

76: handled. The package allows inelastic neutron and X-ray scattering

77: observables to be calculated, allowing comparison with experimental

78: data produced at large scale facilities. Various simplification

79: schemes are presented for analysing displacement vectors, which are

80: otherwise too complicated to understand in very large systems.

81: \end{abstract}

82: 

83: % keywords here, in the form: keyword \sep keyword

84: \begin{keyword}

85: vibrational analysis\sep phonons\sep

86: atomic force-field simulations\sep inelastic neutron/X-ray

87: scattering\sep dynamical structure factor

88: 

89: % PACS codes here, in the form: \PACS code \sep code

90: \PACS 87.15.-v\sep 87.15.Aa\sep 63.20.Dj\sep 61.10.Dp

91: \end{keyword}

92: \end{frontmatter}

93: 

94: %{\bf Program summary}\\

95: %{\it Title of the progam:}\texttt{NMscatt}\\

96: %{\it Catalog identifier:}\\

97: %{\it Program summary URL:}\\

98: %{\it Program obtainable from:} CPC Program Library, Queen's University

99: %  of Belfast, N. Ireland\\

100: %{\it Computer:} x86 PC\\

101: %{\it Operating system:} GNU/Linux, UNIX\\

102: %{\it Programming language used:} FORTRAN77\\

103: %{\it Memory required:} Depends on the system size to be simulated.\\

104: %{\it No. of bits in a word:} 32 or 64\\

105: %{\it No. of processors used:} 1\\

106: %{\it Parallelized?:} No\\

107: %{\it No. of lines in distributed program, including test data, etc.:}

108: %2 500\\

109: %{\it No. of bytes in distributed program, including test data, etc.:}

110: %74 333\\

111: %{\it Distribution format:} tar.gz\\

112: %{\it Typical running time:} About 7 hours per one k-point evaluation

113: %in sampling all modes dispersion curves for a system containing 3550 

114: %atoms in the unit cell on AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4200+.\\

115: %{\it Nature of the physical problem:} Normal mode analysis, phonons

116: %calculation, derivation of incoherent and coherent inelastic

117: %scattering spectra.\\

118: %{\it Method of solution:} Full diagonalization (producing 

119: %eigen-vectors and eigen-values) of dynamical matrix which is

120: %obtained from potential energy function derivation using finite

121: %difference method.\\

122: 

123: 

124: % main text

125: \section{Introduction}

126: At large scale facilities for neutron and X-ray scattering, large

127: quantities of experimental data are produced. For complex, nanoscale

128: systems, understanding this data requires computer models. In the case

129: of inelastic scattering, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations

130: \cite{leach} are

131: widely used to equilibrate structures and explore dynamics as a

132: function of temperature and other experimental parameters. However MD

133: only gives a partial description of vibrational modes through the

134: partial density of states and when knowledge about specific

135: vibrational modes is required, normal mode analysis (NMA) \cite{dusa} 

136: has to be

137: performed. For physics and materials science problems, NMA gives a

138: description of the lattice dynamics via the dispersion (k-vector

139: dependence) of the mode frequencies \cite{frank}. For small systems 

140: ($<$ 200 atoms in

141: the simulation box) very accurate results can be obtained using

142: density functional theory (DFT) methods to determine interatomic force

143: constants \cite{parlinski1, mark1}. By combining DFT and software that 

144: constructs and

145: diagonalises the dynamical matrix and calculates the experimental

146: observables, experimentalists now have sophisticated tools to analyse

147: their data. The PHONON \cite{phonon} package is one of the best examples. 

148: 

149: Phonon codes are traditionally limited to small systems for a number

150: of reasons. For example, for small unit cells, the reciprocal lattice

151: is big and stronger effects of dispersion are expected. If DFT methods

152: are used to determine force constants then these methods are

153: themselves restricted to a few hundred atoms. However the development

154: of nanoscale structures of (partially) crystalline materials

155: stimulates a need for phonon codes to be extended to much larger

156: systems. Parameterised force fields \cite{ff} can be used to determine the

157: inter-atomic force constants and, as will be seen in the example

158: presented here, strong dispersion effects are observed inspite of the

159: small reciprocal lattice. 

160: 

161: In biomolecular systems, the need for NMA has long been recognised and

162: codes like CHARMM \cite{charmm} allow the gamma point normal modes to

163: be calculated for moderately big systems. In addition, the neutron 

164: scattering quantities can be directly calculated from the

165: simulations using the time-correlation function formalism

166: \cite{vhove}, as implemented in the nMOLDYN program \cite{nmoldyn}.

167: A combination of neuton scattering experiments and atomic detail computer

168: simulations has proven to be a powerful technique for studying

169: internal molecular vibrations \cite{jeremy1,jeremy2,jeremy3}. In this approach 

170: one can validate the applied numerical models, i.e. force field 

171: parametrizations, depending on the agreement between the experimental

172: and calculated spectra.

173: 

174: In this paper we present a software package that extends the

175: functionality of codes like PHONON \cite{phonon} and Climax 

176: \cite{climax} to arbitrarily large systems and

177: extends the gamma point only analysis already available for larger

178: systems to include k-vector dependence. The software reads a Hessian

179: matrix of force constants, constructs and diagonalises the dynamical

180: matrix for any k-vector and calculates neutron and X-ray scattering

181: observables. The computational bottleneck remains the diagonalisation

182: of correspondingly large dynamical matrices and we comment on

183: approximations that have to be used when the Brillouin zone cannot be

184: sampled at a large number of points. In large systems, atomistic

185: detail in the displacement vectors can be difficult to interpret due

186: to the large number of degrees of freedom and we present two methods

187: for simplifying this information. The first entails summing

188: displacement vectors over atoms in user-defined beads, while the

189: second involves a reduction of the degrees of freedom in the dynamical

190: matrix by summing over force constants, which has the advantage of

191: reducing the number of modes to be examined. 

192: 

193: \section{Theoretical background}

194: 

195: The standard approach, also called a direct method \cite{parlinsk2},

196: to the lattice vibration problem of

197: crystals is based on the explicit knowledge of the interaction 

198: between all atom-pairs in the system. Subsequently, one deduces 

199: the corresponding force constants, and constructs and diagonalizes the

200: dynamical matrix for any k-vector in order to obtain the frequencies

201: of the normal modes. A reasonable atomic detail description of interactions 

202: within large biomolecular systems are provided using empirical 

203: force fields. 

204: 

205: In the following we will briefly summarize the aspects

206: of the classical theory of lattice vibrations \cite{latt} and proceed to the

207: description of the explicit phonon calculations.

208: 

209: The individual atomic positions in the crystal can be assigned as

210: \begin{equation}

211: \vec R_{n\mu}(t) = \vec R_n+\vec r_\mu+\vec u_{n\mu}(t),

212: \end{equation}

213: where $\vec R_n$ is unit cell lattice vector and $\vec u_{n\mu}(t)$ is

214: displacement of atom $\mu$ from its equilibrium positions $\vec

215: r_\mu$. Within the harmonic approximation we concentrate on expansion 

216: of the small differences of potential energy $V$ due to the

217: small changes in atom positions:

218: \begin{equation}

219: V({\bf u})\approx V_0+\sum_{n\mu\alpha}\frac{\partial V}{\partial

220:   u_{n\mu\alpha}}u_{n\mu\alpha}+\frac{1}{2}\sum_{n\mu\alpha,m\nu\beta}

221: u_{n\mu\alpha}{\bf D}_{n\mu\alpha,m\nu\beta}u_{m\nu\beta}+\dots,

222: \end{equation}

223: where the second derivative defines the force constant between

224: the atoms $\mu$ and $\nu$:

225: \begin{equation}

226: {\bf D}_{n\mu\alpha,m\nu\beta}=\frac{\partial^2 V}{\partial

227:   u_{n\mu\alpha}\partial u_{m\nu\beta}},\qquad(\alpha,\beta=x,y,z)

228: \label{le1}

229: \end{equation}

230: As each unit cell is identical to every other unit cell in the

231: crystal, the displacement pattern of a normal mode has to be identical

232: to that in any other cell to within a phase difference $\vec

233: k(\vec R_n-\vec R_m)$. The representation of the atom displacement 

234: is chosen to be a plain wave ansatz of the form: 

235: \begin{equation}

236: \vec u_{n\mu}(\vec k,t) = \frac{u_0}{\sqrt{M_\mu}}\vec e_{\mu\vec

237:   k}\exp(i[\vec k\vec R_{n}-\omega_{\vec k}t]),

238: \label{le2}

239: \end{equation}

240: where $\vec e_{\mu\vec k}$ is the polarization vector and $M_\mu$ is

241: the mass of the atom $\mu$. We omit writing

242: Cartesian component subscripts. Solving the equation of motion with ansatz 

243: (\ref{le2}) is equivalent to the eigen-value problem

244: \begin{equation}

245: \omega_{\vec kj}^2\vec e_{\mu\vec kj}=\sum_\nu{\cal D}_{\mu \nu}(\vec k)\vec

246: e_{\nu\vec kj},

247: \label{le3}

248: \end{equation}

249: where 

250: \begin{equation}

251: {\cal D}_{\mu \nu}(\vec k)=\sum_m\frac{1}{\sqrt{M_\mu M_\nu}}{\bf

252:   D}_{n\mu,m\nu}\exp[i\vec k(\vec R_m-\vec R_n)]

253: \label{le4}

254: \end{equation}

255: is the so called dynamical matrix.

256: 

257: The form of the dynamical matrix (\ref{le4}) requires 

258: the atom pairs for which one atom belongs to a different unit cell,

259: {\it i.e.} $(m\ne n)$, to be identified. These terms contribute to the so called

260: Bloch-factor $\exp[i\vec k(\vec R_m-\vec R_n)]$ and make the dynamical 

261: matrix complex. But in case of applying periodic boundary conditions

262: (PBC) as implemented in computer simulation programs, the potential

263: energy of a crystal is given as an explicit function of only the atom

264: positions in the primary unit cell. As a consequence, we obtain the 

265: second derivative matrix $\bf H$ in which the contributions from the

266: inter-cell atomic pairs are mapped and added to the corresponding image atom 

267: pairs in the primary unit cell:

268: \begin{equation}

269: \left[\sum_m{\bf D}_{n\mu,m\nu}\right]\to{\bf H}_{\mu,\nu}=

270: \frac{\partial^2 V^{PBC}}{\partial

271:   u_{\mu}\partial u_{\nu}}

272: \label{le5}

273: \end{equation}

274: One can directly obtain ${\bf D}_{n\mu\alpha,m\nu\beta}$ by 

275: increasing the size of the unit cell by one or more layers of

276: periodically arranged image cells and calculate force constants

277: in the extended supercell. However, this approach is unfavourable when

278: dealing with very large systems. 

279: 

280: A similar approach is to decompose the potential energy $V^{PBC}$ in

281: equation (\ref{le5}) into individual contributions from the image

282: cells, $V^{PBC}=V_0+\sum_mV_m$ and evaluate the second derivative

283: matrix for each term upon the same minimized structure.

284: 

285: The situation is simpler if the interaction is truncated at some

286: cutoff distance $r_{cut}$ so that the ``minimum image

287: convention'' (MIC) is obeyed.  The MIC states that each atom interacts 

288: at most with one image of every other atom in the system (which is

289: repeated to fully enclose the primary unit cell with the periodic

290: boundary conditions). This has the effect of limiting the interaction

291: cutoff, for example, to no more than half the length of the minimum side when

292: simulating the orthorhombic cell, $r_{cut} < min\{a/2,b/2,c/2\}$. It 

293: should be noted

294: that the size of nanoscale crystals usually far exceeds the 

295: spatial range of forces between atoms ($\sim$ $<$12 \AA) allowing physically 

296: reasonable cutoff radii to be introduced.  

297: 

298: \begin{figure}[ht]

299: \begin{center}

300: \includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{pbc_e.eps}

301: \caption{A 2D periodic system representing the effect of the minimum

302: image convention while constructing dynamical matrix.

303: If a distance between atom $\nu$ (hollow blue circle) and 

304: $\mu$ (full black circle) is larger than the cut-off distance (red 

305: circle around the atom $\mu$), and if the force constant 

306: ${\bf H}_{\mu\nu}$ turns out to be nonzero, it means that the 

307: value of ${\bf H}_{\mu\nu}$ has to be related to the atom $\nu$ in the

308: image cell $m$ (full blue circle), with the position vector 

309: $\vec r_\nu+\vec l_x$ ($\vec l_x=\vec R_m-\vec R_n$), instead of to

310: the atom $\vec r_\nu$ in the primary cell $n$. The corresponding lattice

311: translation vector $\vec l_x$ is thus determined for the element ${\bf

312: H}_{\mu\nu}$.} 

313: \label{fg1}

314: \end{center}

315: \end{figure}

316: 

317: According to the MIC we can conclude that there is always only one

318: translation $\vec t$ per atom pair $(\nu,\mu)$ giving rise to the 

319: minimum distance $|(\vec r_\nu+\vec t)- \vec r_\mu|$:

320: \begin{eqnarray}

321: \exists s_\alpha &=& \{-1,0,1\}_{\alpha=1,2,3}: 

322: \vec t=s_1\vec l_1 + s_2\vec l_2 + s_3\vec l_3;\\

323: && {\textrm{so

324:     that:}\quad |(\vec r_\nu+\vec t)- \vec r_\mu|=min,}\nonumber 

325: \end{eqnarray}

326: where $\vec l_\alpha$ are lattice translation vectors, c.f. Fig. \ref{fg1}.

327: In the case of a nonvanishing ${\bf  H}_{\mu,\nu}$ we get the

328: following expression for a dynamical matrix element 

329: 

330: \begin{equation}

331: {\cal D}_{\mu \nu}(\vec k)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{M_\mu M_\nu}}\left\{

332: \begin{array}{ll}

333: {\bf H}_{\mu,\nu}, & {\textrm{if : }} |\vec r_\mu-\vec

334: r_\nu|<r_{cut}\\

335: {\bf H}_{\mu,\nu}\exp(i\vec k\vec t), & {\textrm{if : }} |\vec r_\mu-\vec

336: r_\nu|>r_{cut}\\

337: \end{array}\right.

338: \end{equation}

339: 

340: According to equation (\ref{le3}) the diagonalization of 

341: matrix ${\cal D}(\vec k)$ yields the phonon

342: frequencies $\omega_{\vec kj}$ and corresponding polarization

343: vectors $\vec e_{\mu\vec kj}$ for a given phonon wave vector $\vec k$.

344: A complete solution leads to the phonon dispersion relations. The

345: subscript $j$ denotes a branch in the phonon dispersion. In a

346: crystal of $N$ atoms, there are $3N$ branches.

347:  

348: \vskip 0.2cm

349: {\bf Inelastic scattering}

350: \vskip 0.2cm

351: 

352: The dynamic structure factor $S(\vec q,\omega)$ contains information

353: about the structure and dynamics of the sample. It can be split into

354: a coherent part arising from the cross-correlations of atomic motions

355: and an incoherent part describing self-correlations of single atom

356: motions. According to the standard theory \cite{bee, lovesey},

357: which is based on the harmonic approximation, we obtain the following 

358: expressions for the coherent and incoherent dynamical structure factors:

359: \begin{eqnarray}

360: S(\vec q,\omega)_{coh} &=& \sum_{\vec G}\sum_{\vec

361:   k,j}\frac{\hbar}{2\omega_{\vec kj}}

362: \left|\sum_\mu\sigma_\mu^{coh}\frac{\vec q \cdot\vec e_{\mu\vec

363:   kj}}{\sqrt{M_\mu}}\exp(-W_\mu(\vec q)+i\vec q\vec r_\mu)

364: \right|^2\times\nonumber\\

365: &\times&

366: (n(\omega_{\vec kj})+1)\delta(\omega-\omega_{\vec kj})

367: \delta(\vec q+\vec k-\vec G),

368: \label{eqn_coh}

369: \end{eqnarray}

370: and

371: \begin{eqnarray}

372: S(\vec q,\omega)_{inc} &=& \sum_\mu\sigma_\mu^{inc}\sum_{\vec

373:   k,j}\frac{\hbar}{2M_\mu\omega_{\vec kj}}|\vec q \cdot\vec e_{\mu\vec

374:   kj}|^2(n(\omega_{\vec kj})+1)\times\nonumber\\

375: &\times& \exp[-2W_\mu(\vec

376:   q)]\delta(\omega-\omega_{\vec kj}),

377: \end{eqnarray}

378: where $\vec q$ is the scattering vector, $\sigma_\mu$ is the

379: corresponding atomic scattering

380: length, $(n(\omega)+1)$ refers to the 

381: phonon creation process (absorption spectrum) and $n(\omega)$ is the 

382: mean number of phonons of frequency $\omega$ at temperature $T$ 

383: according to the Bose-Einstein statistics

384: \begin{equation}

385: (n(\omega)+1)=\frac{\exp(\hbar\omega/k_BT)}{\exp(\hbar\omega/k_BT)-1}

386: \end{equation}

387: The factor $\exp[-2W_\mu(\vec q)]$ is called the Debye-Waller factor:

388: \begin{equation}

389: W_\mu(\vec q)=\frac{\vec{q}\cdot{\bf B}(\mu)\cdot\vec{q}}{2},\qquad

390: B_{\alpha\beta}(\mu)=\langle u_{\mu\alpha}u_{\mu\beta}\rangle_T,

391: \end{equation}

392: where ${\bf B}(\mu)$ is a $3\times 3$ symmetric tensor representing

393: the thermodynamic mean square displacement of an atom $\mu$, which can

394: be expressed by the partial atomic phonon density of states 

395: $g_{\alpha\beta,\mu}(\omega)$:

396: \begin{equation}

397: B_{\alpha\beta}(\mu)=\frac{{3N}\hbar}

398:     {2M_\mu}\int_0^{\infty}\frac{d\omega}{\omega}

399:     g_{\alpha\beta,\mu}(\omega)

400:     \coth\left(\frac{\hbar\omega}{2k_BT}\right).

401: \label{le6}

402: \end{equation}

403: The partial atomic density of states is a weighted distribution of

404: normal modes

405: \begin{equation}

406: g_{\alpha\beta,\mu}(\omega)=\frac{1}{3Nn}\sum_{\vec

407:   k,j}^{n3N}e_{\alpha\mu\vec kj}e^*_{\beta\mu\vec kj}

408: \delta(\omega-\omega_{\vec kj}),

409: \end{equation} 

410: where $n$ is the number of sampling $\vec k$-points in the first

411: Brillouin zone.

412: 

413: The evaluation of the Debye-Waller $B$ factors

414: using equation (\ref{le6}) requires extra attention due to the

415: ``zero-phonon'' term resulting from 

416: the singularity caused by phonon (acoustic) branches where 

417: $\omega(\vec q,j)=0$. The contributions of the 3 acoustic

418: modes is treated separately by using the Debye approximation for the

419: density of states, {\it i.e.} $g_{ac}(\omega)\propto\omega^2$, and

420: normalization $\int_0^{\omega_{max}}g_{ac}(\omega)d\omega=3$, 

421: where $\omega_{max}$ is the maximum frequency up to which the 

422: acoustic dispersion curve is linear

423: \begin{eqnarray}

424: B_{\alpha\beta}(\mu) &=& \sum_{j=1}^3\frac{3\hbar}

425:     {M_\mu\omega_{j\,max}^3}\int_0^{\omega_{j\,max}}

426:     \omega e_{\alpha\mu\vec kj}e^*_{\beta\mu\vec kj}

427:     \left(\frac{1}{\exp(\hbar\omega/k_BT)-1}+\frac{1}{2}\right)d\omega

428:     \nonumber\\

429: &=& \sum_{j=1}^3\frac{3\hbar e_{\alpha\mu\vec kj}e^*_{\beta\mu\vec kj}}

430:     {M_\mu\omega_{j\,max}}\left[\left(\frac{k_BT}

431:     {\hbar\omega_{j\,max}}\right)^2\int_0^{x_{j\,max}}

432:     \frac{x}{\exp(x)-1}dx+\frac{1}{4}\right].

433: \end{eqnarray}

434: A new variable $x_{j\,max}={\hbar\omega_{j\,max}}/{k_BT}$ was

435: introduced in the last equation.

436: 

437: 

438: \section{Analysing the displacement vectors}

439: 

440: For systems containing thousands of atoms (N) the displacement vectors

441: obtained by diagonalising the dynamical matrix can be difficult to

442: understand, especially for low frequency modes which involve the

443: displacement of many (or all) atoms. One simple solution to this

444: problem is to sum over the displacements of atoms within beads, which

445: represent logical coarse grains of the system, for example base

446: molecules in the DNA example below. This treatment allows different

447: bead definitions to be applied to the calculated displacement

448: vectors but has the disadvantage of not reducing the number of

449: displacement vectors from 3N. 

450: 

451: A related approach is to reduce the atomic level Hessian matrix to

452: lower dimension by mapping the inter-atomic force constants on to

453: inter-bead force constants \cite{venkat}. For N' beads, the resulting dynamical

454: matrices have dimension 3N' and therefore result in 3N' displacement

455: vectors for any k-vector. We note that any reduction in the

456: dimensionality of the system causes a loss in information, which is

457: the rotational degrees of freedom of the beads (rigid bodies). 

458: 

459: 

460: \section{Example}

461: 

462: To verify the implemented formalism we have simulated a

463: B-form DNA molecule (right-handed, 10 base-pairs per turn, pitch

464: 33.6\AA) using CHARMM \cite{charmm}. The full crystal

465: environment was generated using periodic boundary conditions for

466: an orthorhombic unit cell containing one helix of DNA.

467: The dimension of the unit cell is $a=32.2$\AA, $b=31.8$\AA\  and

468: $c=33.5$\AA, with $c$ parallel to the helical axis.

469: The starting configuration was obtained by minimization of the

470: potential energy of the crystal structure obtained as the

471: time average over a 1ns MD simulation at 100K. The Hessian matrix of

472: force constants was generated by displacing each atom in turn from

473: equilibrium and calculating the forces induced on all other

474: atoms. Diagonalisation of the resulting dynamical matrices was

475: performed using the the routine {\texttt{zcheev}} from the LAPACK

476: library \cite{LAPACK}. 

477:  

478: \begin{figure}

479: \psfrag{S(q,w) [arb. units]}{\small $S(\vec q,\omega)$ [arb. units]}

480: \psfrag{energy transfer [cm-1]}{\small energy transfer $\omega [cm^{-1}]$}

481: \begin{center}

482: \includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth]{coh.eps}

483: \caption{Coherent dynamical structure factor of B-DNA. 

484: Scattering vector $\vec  q$ is varied along the helical axis (0,0,1). 

485: Shown are $S(\vec q,\omega),\ |\vec q|=0.019\dots0.581$\AA$^{-1}$.}

486: \label{fg2}

487: \end{center}

488: \end{figure}

489: 

490: The typical coherent spectrum of DNA, Figure \ref{fg2}, obtained from

491: equation \ref{eqn_coh}, shows a well-defined 

492: Brillouin peak at small $\omega$ which moves along the frequency 

493: dimension upon varying momentum transfer $\vec q$. Fitting the

494: spectral profile with a Gaussian as a function of wave-vector gives

495: the dispersion curve shown in Figure 

496: \ref{fg3}, which compares well with the recent experimental 

497: results \cite{dna_jcp}.

498: \begin{figure}

499: \psfrag{w [cm-1]}{\small $\omega$ [cm$^{-1}$]}

500: \psfrag{q [A-1]}{\small $q$[\AA$^{-1}$]}

501: \begin{center}

502: \includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth]{disp.eps}

503: \caption{Dispersion curves obtained by Gaussian fitting of the

504:   calculated Brillouin peak for inelastic X-ray scattering using 

505: \texttt{NMscatt} (solid curve + circles), and using nMoldyn (dashed

506:   curve + squares).}

507: \label{fg3}

508: \end{center}

509: \end{figure}

510: Figure \ref{fg3} also shows the result of the equivalent analysis of a

511: 300K MD simulation on the same model of B-DNA using nMoldyn. 

512: 

513: In order to gain insight into the nature of low frequency dynamics we

514: can analyse the displacement vectors at an atomic level (see Figure

515: \ref{fg5}(a) for an acoustic mode). 

516: By summing over the displacement

517:  vectors in terms of beads, where base

518: molecules, sugar molecules and phosphate groups are treated as single

519: units, a simplified picture of the normal modes is obtained. Figure

520: \ref{fg5}(b) shows a high frequency mode which has a pronounced

521: contribution from the phosphate groups. 

522: \begin{figure}

523: \begin{center}

524: \subfigure[B-DNA: acoustic mode]{\includegraphics

525: [width=0.40\textwidth]{vmode0.ps}}

526: \qquad

527: \subfigure[B-DNA: beads]{\includegraphics

528: [width=0.454\textwidth]{vmode1.ps}}

529: \caption{Atomic {\it a)} and {\it b)} beads 

530: (base molecules, sugar molecules and

531:   phosphate groups) displacements of the selected mode.} 

532: \label{fg5}

533: \end{center}

534: \end{figure}

535: 

536: \section{Conclusion}

537: The new, user-friendly computational package

538: \texttt{NMscatt} presented here enable an efficient

539: atomic detail analysis of different types of inelastic scattering

540: applied to arbitrarily large nanoscale systems. The ability to

541: perform molecular dynamics and phonon calculations on large

542: nano and bio-molecular materials means that one can efficiently pursue

543: the investigation of some poorly understood structural and dynamical 

544: features of these systems.

545:  

546:  \section{Acknowledgements.} 

547: The authors are grateful to

548: Dr. Stephane Rols for helpful discussions at the start of this project. 

549: MJ acknowledges a long-standing collaboration with Prof. Krzysztof

550: Parlinski. FM acknowledges a financial support from ILL during his

551: stay in Grenoble and support from the Ministry of Higher Education, 

552: Science and Technology of Republic of Slovenia under Grant nos. 

553: P1-0002, J1-6331 and J1-5115.

554: 

555: \vskip 1cm

556: \appendix

557: \section{Program package and data structure}

558: 

559: There are four main modules in the \texttt{NMscatt} program package

560: {\it phonon, coh, incoh} and {\it bead}, and the overall

561: \texttt{NMscatt} structure

562: is given in Figure \ref{fg6}. Below are described the corresponding

563: modules.

564: \begin{itemize}

565: \item{\it phonon}: Providing the full Hessian matrix for a given 

566: energy-minimized atomic structure within the specified

567: crystallographic unit cell this module constructs dynamical matrix and

568: calculates its eigenvalues and eigenvectors at given wave vector

569: $\vec k$. At input this module requires to specify the Bravais lattice

570: vectors that were previously used in the molecular mechanics/dynamics

571: simulation 

572: package to satisfy the periodic boundary conditions while generating

573: the minimized structure. The cut-off radius must be given at which 

574: the long range interactions are truncated while calculating the Hessian 

575: matrix in the simulation. At output two separate files 

576: \texttt{eig\_val\_}$n$ and

577: \texttt{eig\_vec\_}$n$ are written containing

578: eigenvalues and eigenvectors, respectively, where $n$ assigns 

579: a consecutive number of the sampling $k$-point in the first Brillouin

580: zone. These files serve as an imput for other modules of

581: \texttt{NMscatt}. The choice $n=0$ is assumed to be reserved for the

582: $\Gamma$-point, $\vec k=(0,0,0)$. The lowest $n$ should sample

583: the vicinity of the $\Gamma$-point. The $k$-points are to be specified

584: in the fractional coordinates with respect to the reciprocal lattice

585: vectors. The elements of the upper triangle of the hessian matrix should be

586: provided in the binary (default) \texttt{hessian\_uf} or alternatively in the

587: ASCII file \texttt{hessian\_f} and the atomic coordinates in the file 

588: \texttt{coord} writen in the CHARMM coordinate format. 

589:  

590: \item{\it incoh}: This module allows to calculate atomic

591: Debye-Waller factors representing the mean square displacements

592: and dynamical structure factor of incoherent one-phonon

593: neutron scattering on monocrystals and from orientationally 

594: averaged powder. In the latter case we need to specify an

595: absolute value of momentum transfer $q$, range of the $k$-point

596: index $n$: $0-n_{max}$ for picking up the corresponding $k$-point

597: eigenvalues- and eigenvectors-files generated by {\it phonon}, 

598: number of random orientations

599: of $q$ vector to provide spherical averaging and absolute temperature.

600: Also, one has to define the $k$-point index $n_a$, for which the

601: $k$-point range $0-n_a$ corresponds to the linear regime of the

602: acoustic-mode-dispersion curves. This is needed for the proper 

603: derivation of Debye-Waller factors using Debye approximation.

604: As a result, the function $S(q,\omega)$ is given in the file 

605: \texttt{s\_q\_w}. Optionally, one can also obtain density of states

606: (DOS) in this module.

607:   

608: \item{\it coh}: This module calculates dynamical structure factor of 

609: coherent one-phonon neutron or X-ray scattering on monocrystals. 

610: In addition to the input data required by {\it incoh} (except for

611: the spherical averaging), we need to define for module {\it coh} also

612: the type of scattering neutron/X-ray, the number of higher Brillouin

613: zones included for sampling momentum transfer vector, and the range

614: of the $k$-point index $n_1-n_2$ evaluated by module {\it phonon} 

615: and assigning the $k$-points in the first Brillouin zone, which lie 

616: along the selected direction of the momentum transfer vector $\vec q$.  

617: As a result, the function $S(q,\omega)$ is given in the file 

618: \texttt{s\_qw\_coh}. 

619: 

620: \item{\it bead}: This module is used to enable visualization of selected

621: vibrational modes obtained by running {\it phonon} for the $\Gamma$-point,

622: such that atomic displacement vectors are projected on to the beads,

623: which are defined as the center of mass of larger atomic groups

624: of the system, for example residues. The output files are readable

625: by the program \texttt{xmakemol}\cite{xmkml} which enables direct

626: visualisation of the mode.

627: 

628: \end{itemize}

629: 

630: \begin{figure}[ht]

631: \begin{center}

632: \includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{flowch.eps}

633: \caption{Flow-chart of the \texttt{NMscatt} program package. }

634: \label{fg6}

635: \end{center}

636: \end{figure}

637: 

638: \pagebreak

639: \noindent

640: {\bf Compiling}

641: 

642: To compile the program package Makefile is provided. It is important

643: to note that 64-bits processors are prerequisite for applying the

644: \texttt{NMscatt} to analysis of the large systems (containing more

645: than 2000 atoms). One needs to install the LAPACK library on the 

646: computer beforehand,  prior to \texttt{NMscatt}. The fortran compiling 

647: switches \texttt{g77 -mcmodel=medium -funroll-all-loops -fno-f2c -O3} 

648: are recomended when installed on 64-bits processors running Linux.

649: 

650: \noindent

651: {\bf Benchmark results}

652: 

653: Bencmark results were obtained on AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core Processor

654: 2.2GHz running Linux for B-form DNA simulated with the CHARMM program.

655: 

656: %\noindent

657: %{\bf Sample input}

658: 

659: \newpage

660: \clearpage

661: 

662: \begin{thebibliography}{00}

663: 

664: \bibitem{leach} A.R. Leach, {\it Molecular Modelling: Principles and

665:   applications} (Pearson Education, Harlow, 2001).

666: 

667: \bibitem{dusa} B.R. Brooks, D. Jane\v zi\v c and M. Karplus, {\it

668:   J. Comp. Chem.}, {\bf 16} 1522-1542 (1995).

669: 

670: \bibitem{frank} W. Frank, C. Els\" asser and M. F\" ahnle, {\it

671:   Phys. Rev. Lett.}, {\bf 74} 1791-1794 (1995).

672: 

673: \bibitem{parlinski1} K. Parlinski and G. Chapuis, {\it

674:   J. Chem. Phys.}, {\bf 110} 6406-6411 (1999).

675: 

676: \bibitem{mark1} M.R. Johnson, K. Parlinski, I. Natkaniec and

677:  B.S. Hudson {\it Chem. Phys.}, {\bf 291} 53-60 (2003).

678: 

679: \bibitem{phonon} K. Parlinski, PHONON Manual, Version 4.22, 

680: {\texttt http://wolf.ifj.edu.pl/phonon/}.

681: 

682: \bibitem{ff} A.D.J. MacKerrel, D. Bashford, M. Bellott, et al.,

683:   {\it J. Phys. Chem. B.}, {\bf 102}, 3586 (1998).

684: 

685: \bibitem{charmm} B. R. Brooks, R. E. Bruccoleri, B. D. Olafson,

686: D. J. States, S. Swaminathan, M. Karplus, J. Comput. Chem. {\bf 4},

687: 187 (1983).

688: 

689: \bibitem{vhove} L. van Hove, {\it Phys. Rev.}, {\bf 95}, 249 (1954).

690: 

691: \bibitem{nmoldyn} G.R. Kneller, V. Keiner, M. Kneller and M. Schiller,

692:  {\it Comput. Phys. Comm.}, {\bf 91} 191-214 (1995).

693: 

694: \bibitem{jeremy1}J.C. Smith, {\it Q. Rev. Biophys}, {\bf 24} 227-291 (1991).

695: 

696: \bibitem{jeremy2}G.R. Kneller, W. Doster, M. Settles, S. Cusack and

697:   J.C. Smith, {\it J. Chem. Phys.}, {\bf 97} 8864-8879 (1992).

698: 

699: \bibitem{jeremy3} A.M. Micu, D. Durand, M. Quilichini, M.J. Field and

700:  J.C. Smith {\it

701:  J. Phys. Chem.}, {\bf 99} 5645-5657 (1995).

702: 

703: \bibitem{climax} G.J. Kearley, {\it Nucl. Inst. Meth. Phys. Res. A},

704:   {\bf 354} 53-58 (1995).

705: 

706: \bibitem{parlinsk2} K. Parlinski, Z. Q. Li and Y Kawazoe,

707:   {\it Phys. Rev. Lett.}, {\bf 78}, 4063 (1997).

708: 

709: \bibitem{latt} B. Donovan and J.F. Angress, {\it Lattice vibrations}

710:   (Chapman and Hall Ltd., London, 1971).

711: 

712: \bibitem{bee} M. Bee, {\it Quasielastic Neutron Scattering: Principles

713:   and Applications in Solid State Chemistry, Biology and Materials

714:   Science} (Hilger, Bristol, 1988).

715: 

716: \bibitem{lovesey} S. Lovesey, {\it Theory of Neutron Scattering from

717:   Condensed Matter}, international Series of Monographs on physics 72

718:   (Oxford Science, Oxford 1984).

719: 

720: \bibitem{venkat} G. Venkataraman and V.C. Sahni, {\it

721:   Rev. Mod. Phys.}, {\bf 42}, 409 (1970).

722: 

723: 

724: \bibitem{LAPACK} {\texttt http://www.netlib.org/lapack/}.

725: 

726: \bibitem{dna_jcp} Y. Liu, S.H. Chen, D. Berti, P. Baglioni, A. Alatas,

727:   H. Sinn, E. Alp and A. Said, {\it J. Chem. Phys.}, {\bf 123}, 214909 (2005).

728: 

729: \bibitem{xmkml} {\texttt http://www.nongnu.org/xmakemol/}.

730: 

731: \end{thebibliography}

732: 

733: % The Appendices part is started with the command \appendix;

734: % appendix sections are then done as normal sections

735: % \appendix

736: 

737: % \section{}

738: % \label{}

739: 

740: %\begin{thebibliography}{00}

741: 

742: % \bibitem{label}

743: % Text of bibliographic item

744: 

745: % notes:

746: % \bibitem{label} \note

747: 

748: % subbibitems:

749: % \begin{subbibitems}{label}

750: % \bibitem{label1}

751: % \bibitem{label2}

752: % If there is a note, it should come last:

753: % \bibitem{label3} \note

754: % \end{subbibitems}

755: 

756: %\bibitem{}

757: 

758: %\end{thebibliography}

759: 

760: \end{document}

761: 

762: