1: % Template article for preprint document class `elsart'

2: % SP 2001/01/05

3: 

4: \documentclass[twocolumn]{elsart}

5: 

6: % Use the option doublespacing or reviewcopy to obtain double line spacing

7: % \documentclass[doublespacing]{elsart}

8: 

9: % if you use PostScript figures in your article

10: % use the graphics package for simple commands

11: \usepackage{graphics}

12: % or use the graphicx package for more complicated commands

13: % \usepackage{graphicx}

14: % or use the epsfig package if you prefer to use the old commands

15: % \usepackage{epsfig}

16: 

17: % The amssymb package provides various useful mathematical symbols

18: \usepackage{amssymb}

19: 

20: \begin{document}

21: 

22: \begin{frontmatter}

23: 

24: % Title, authors and addresses

25: 

26: % use the thanksref command within \title, \author or \address for footnotes;

27: % use the corauthref command within \author for corresponding author footnotes;

28: % use the ead command for the email address,

29: % and the form \ead[url] for the home page:

30: % \title{Title\thanksref{label1}}

31: % \thanks[label1]{}

32: % \author{Name\corauthref{cor1}\thanksref{label2}}

33: % \ead{email address}

34: % \ead[url]{home page}

35: % \thanks[label2]{}

36: % \corauth[cor1]{}

37: % \address{Address\thanksref{label3}}

38: % \thanks[label3]{}

39: 

40: \title{LHCb Level-0 Trigger Detectors}

41: 

42: % use optional labels to link authors explicitly to addresses:

43: % \author[label1,label2]{}

44: % \address[label1]{}

45: % \address[label2]{}

46: 

47: \author{A.~Sarti\corauthref{cor}}

48: 

49: \corauth[cor]{Corresponding author. Address: asarti@lnf.infn.it}

50: 

51: \address{INFN-Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, Via E.Fermi, 40, 44100, Frascati, Italy}

52: 

53: \begin{abstract}

54: % Text of abstract

55: The calorimeter and muon systems are essential components 

56: to provide a trigger for the LHCb experiment.  The calorimeter system

57: comprises a scintillating pad detector and pre-shower, followed 

58: by electromagnetic and hadronic calorimeters. The 

59: calorimeter system allows photons, electrons and hadrons to be 

60: identified, and their energy to be measured. The muon system consists 

61: of five measuring stations equipped with Multi-Wire Proportional

62: Chambers (MWPCs) and triple-Gas Electron Multiplier (GEM) 

63: detectors, separated by iron 

64: filters. It allows the muons identification and transverse momentum 

65: measurement. The status of the two systems and their 

66: expected performance is presented.

67: \end{abstract}

68: 

69: \begin{keyword}

70: % keywords here, in the form: keyword \sep keyword

71: LHCb \sep Calorimeter \sep MWPC \sep GEM \sep Level-0 Trigger

72: % PACS codes here, in the form: \PACS code \sep code

73: \PACS 29.40.Vj \sep 29.40.Cs \sep 29.40.Gx

74: \end{keyword}

75: \end{frontmatter}

76: 

77: % main text

78: \section{Introduction}

79: \label{sec:intro}

80: 

81: The LHCb experiment is dedicated 

82: to the study of the decays of beauty hadrons

83: produced at the LHC. Precision measurements

84: of CP violation and rare decays in the 

85: $B$ meson systems, which are the main LHCb goals, can be achieved

86: only with a very well designed and efficient trigger\cite{bib:trigger}.\\

87: A key role in the trigger is played by the Level-0 (L0)

88: hardware step that reduces the event rate from 40MHz to

89: 1MHz using the input from the VELO\cite{bib:VELO} detector, the calorimeter

90: system\cite{bib:calotdr} and the muon system \cite{bib:muontdr}.

91: Design performances have been optimized 

92: in order to allow a fast reconstruction of high 

93: transverse energy ($E_T$, CALO system)

94: or high transverse momentum ($P_T$, MUON system) candidates

95: needed by the L0 decision unit (L0DU).

96: 

97: \section{Calorimeter system}

98: \label{sec:Calo}

99: 

100: The CALO system\cite{bib:calotdr} is made of a Scintillating

101: Pad Detector (SPD), followed by a Pre-Shower (PS)

102: in front of the Electromagnetic CALorimeter (ECAL) and

103: the Hadronic CALorimeter (HCAL).\\

104: The active elements

105: are scintillating tiles, read out via wave-length shifting fibres 

106: to photo-multipliers.  The scintillator is interleaved with lead for 

107: the electromagnetic calorimeter in a Shashlik construction, while for 

108: the hadronic calorimeter it is interleaved with steel tiles.\\

109: All these subdetectors are characterised by a pseudo-projective 

110: geometry achieved using a variable detector module granularity.

111: 

112: \subsection{Scintillating pad detector and pre-shower}

113: \label{sec:SPD-PS}

114: 

115: The SPD and PS detectors are used to distinguish

116: electrons from pions and photons (SPD), photons from

117: Minimum Ionizing Particles and to veto busy events

118: with a very high charged multiplicity (SPD).\\

119: The SPD/PS system is made from a lead converter plate 

120: (14mm thick) that is  sandwiched between two layers of 

121: scintillator pads (15mm thick).

122: The light collected is read from a Multi-Anode

123: PhotoMulTiplier (MAPMT) and sent to a Front-End card

124: (VFE).

125: 

126: \subsection{Electromagnetic calorimeter}

127: \label{sec:ECAL}

128: %==============================================

129: \begin{figure}[htbp]

130: \begin{center}

131: \resizebox{6.5cm}{!}{%

132: \includegraphics{fig5.eps}

133: }

134: \caption{ECAL module relative energy resolution, measured with

135: a 50GeV electron beam.}

136: \label{fig:energy-reso}

137: \end{center}

138: \end{figure}

139: %==============================================

140: The electromagnetic calorimeter is used to measure

141: the electron, photon and pion $E_T$. It provides

142: particle identification (PID) and reconstruction

143: information for the particles used in offline analysis.\\

144: It consists of nearly 3k Shashlik modules, for

145: a total of 6k detector cells,

146: that are read using WaveLenght Shifting (WLS) fibers from

147: KURARAY. Each module is positioned on the ECAL wall 

148: with $\pm$0.5mm ($x,y$) and $\pm$2mm ($z$) precision.\\ 

149: In order to achieve the design relative energy

150: resolution ($\sigma(E)/E = 10\% / \sqrt{E} \oplus 1.5\%$, 

151: with $E$ in GeV), a sampling structure of 2mm lead sheets

152: interspersed with 4mm thick scintillator plates has been used:

153: test beam results, using 50GeV electrons, are shown in

154: Fig.\ref{fig:energy-reso} (the achieved $\sigma(E)/E$ is 

155: $(9.4\pm0.2)\% / \sqrt{E} \oplus (0.83\pm0.02)\% \oplus (0.145\pm0.013)/E$, 

156: with $E$ in GeV).\\

157: Each module light yield is measured to be nearly 

158: 3000 ph.e./GeV.

159: Cell dimensions are varying in the range

160: 4$\times$4cm$^2$ to 12$\times$12cm$^2$.

161: The ECAL depth accounts for 25 electromagnetic radiation

162: lengths ($X_0$) and 1.1 hadronic interaction lengths

163: ($\lambda$).  

164: 

165: 

166: \subsection{Hadronic calorimeter}

167: \label{sec:HCAL}

168: 

169: The hadronic calorimeter is an iron-scintillator

170: tile calorimeter, composed of 52 modules

171: (1468 detector cells) with

172: variable granularity: the cell dimensions

173: vary from 13$\times$13cm$^2$ to 26$\times$26cm$^2$.\\

174: It is used to measure the $E_T$ of hadrons, and to provide

175: them to the offline analysis.

176: The HCAL depth accounts for 5.6 $\lambda$:

177: each module is read using WLS fibers and PMTs.\\

178: HCAL modules have been tested with a 30GeV electron

179: beam: the signal pulse is well contained in the 

180: 25ns bunch-crossing window. The energy resolution

181: achieved matches the design value 

182: ($\sigma(E)/E = 80\% / \sqrt{E} \oplus 10\%$, 

183: with $E$ in GeV) while

184: the achieved tile-to-tile spread is less than 5\%.\\

185: The HCAL wall has been assembled achieving 

186: a module-positioning precision of the order of

187: 0.5mm ($x,y$ plane and $y$ coordinate) and 1.5mm ($y,z$ lateral

188: plane). 

189: 

190: \section{Muon system}

191: \label{sec:Muon}

192: 

193: The LHCb muon system \cite{bib:muontdr}

194: is composed of five tracking stations, each subdivided in 

195: four concentric regions, which comprise 1368 MWPCs

196: and 24 triple GEM detectors.

197: The muon detector is required to have a high detection efficiency and

198: a good spatial and time resolution.\\

199: The geometry is projective: the layout 

200: has been optimized by choosing an $x,y$ granularity 

201: that added a contribution to the $P_T$ resolution 

202: nearly equal to that from the multiple

203: scattering.

204: The final layout is composed of 20 different pad sizes

205: (from 6.3$\times$31mm to 250$\times$310mm) resulting in 120k

206: logical channels.\\

207: 

208: \subsection{Triple GEM detectors}

209: \label{sec:GEM}

210: 

211: Triple GEM detectors\cite{bib:GEM} are going to be used only in the 

212: innermost region of the first station,

213: where the particle rate is expected to be the highest.\\

214: Those chambers are characterised by a high

215: rate capability, a high station efficiency 

216: (greater than 96\% in 20ns time window)

217: and a low cluster size (less than 1.2).

218: The achieved time resolution is 3ns when using 

219: an Ar/CO$_2$/CF$_4$ gas mixture of 45\%/15\%/40\%.

220: %a gas mixture composed by Ar/CO$_2$/CF$_4$ (45/15/40).

221: 

222: \subsection{MWPC}

223: \label{sec:MWPC}

224: 

225: %

226: %==============================================

227: \begin{figure}[!t]

228: \begin{center}

229: \resizebox{6.5cm}{!}{%

230: \includegraphics{Fig3.eps}

231: }

232: \caption{Efficiency (left scale and open circles) and pad-cluster size 

233: (right scale and solid circles) of a double-gap

234:  MWPC as a function of the high voltage (HV). The working region (WR)

235: is shown. Curves are drawn to guide the eye.}

236: \label{fig:plateau}

237: \end{center}

238: \end{figure}

239: %==============================================

240: %

241: The MWPCs  used in the muon system

242: are composed of double gas gaps that

243: are further logically OR-ed:

244: this will ensure a high hit detection efficiency and enhance the

245: detector robustness.\\

246: In order to meet the performance required for triggering and for physics

247: analysis, each double-gap should have an

248: efficiency $\geq 95$\%, within a 20ns time window, 

249: a cluster size $\leq 1.1$, as well as good ageing properties. 

250: These performances were measured, using a MIP test beam, 

251: as a function of the high voltage (HV) applied to the wires,

252: using an Ar/CO$_2$/CF$_4$ gas mixture of 40\%/50\%/10\%.

253: The results reported in Fig.\ref{fig:plateau}

254: show that the above conditions are satisfied for 

255: $2530 \leq \mathrm{HV} \leq 2700$V.\\

256: MWPCs are read out with a custom radiation hard chip (named

257: CARIOCA) 

258: that works as an amplifier, shaper and discriminator

259: characterised by a 10ns peak time. 

260: Chambers installation is currently starting: the expected

261: positioning precision is $\pm$1mm.

262: 

263: \section{L0 trigger}

264: 

265: The L0 hardware trigger\cite{bib:trigger} is fully synchronous, 

266: it has a fixed 

267: latency (4$\mu$s) and reduces the 40MHz interaction rate to

268: 1MHz.  The L0 Decision Unit (L0DU) takes as input: (from the CALO)

269: the highest $E_T$ candidate for each type (e, $\gamma$, $\pi^0$),

270: the total measured energy, the charged multiplicity

271: and (from the MUON) the two highest $P_T$ candidates per quadrant.

272: An efficiency of 30-50\% is achieved for the hadronic channels

273: (accounting for about 700kHz bandwidth) while

274: the muon channels are selected with 90\% efficiency.

275: 

276: \section{Conclusion}

277: 

278: The LHCb CALO and MUON systems 

279: are currently under installation and are going

280: to be ready for the data taking start in July 2007.

281: The calorimeter construction is now almost completed, and more than 

282: half of the required muon chambers have been produced.  

283: The muon filters are already in place while the support

284: wall is being built. 

285: Test beam data showed that the

286: design values have been achieved: detectors timing and 

287: resolution performances are very good.

288: The L0 hardware trigger design has been finalized:

289: the obtained efficiencies for hadronic, muonic and

290: radiative channels are expected to be 30--50\%, 90\% and 70\% 

291: respectively.

292: 

293: \begin{thebibliography}{00}

294: 

295: \bibitem{bib:trigger} A.\ Barczyk, these proceedings.

296: 

297: \bibitem{bib:VELO} J.J.\ Van Hunen, these proceedings.

298: 

299: \bibitem{bib:calotdr} LHCb Collaboration, 

300: ``LHCb Calorimeters Technical Design Report'', 

301: CERN/LHCC 2000-036 (2000).

302: 

303: %

304: %==========1===========

305: %

306: \bibitem{bib:muontdr} LHCb Collaboration, 

307: ``LHCb Muon System Technical Design Report'', 

308: CERN/LHCC 2001-010 (2001) and 

309: ``Addendum to the Muon System Technical Design Report'', 

310: CERN/LHCC 2003-002 (2003).

311: 

312: \bibitem{bib:GEM} M.\ Alfonsi et al., ``The Triple-GEM detector 

313: for the M1R1 muon station at LHCb'', N14-182, 2005 IEEE NSS 

314: Conference, Puerto Rico

315: 

316: \end{thebibliography}

317: 

318: \end{document}

319: 

320: