1: % ****** Start of file apssamp.tex ******
2: % This file is part of the APS files in the REVTeX 4 distribution.
3: % Version 4.0 of REVTeX, August 2001
4: % Copyright (c) 2001 The American Physical Society.
5: % See the REVTeX 4 README file for restrictions and more information.
6: % TeX'ing this file requires that you have AMS-LaTeX 2.0 installed
7: % as well as the rest of the prerequisites for REVTeX 4.0
8: % See the REVTeX 4 README file
9: % It also requires running BibTeX. The commands are as follows:
10: % 1) latex apssamp.tex
11: % 2) bibtex apssamp
12: % 3) latex apssamp.tex
13: % 4) latex apssamp.tex
14: %\documentclass[preprint,showpacs,preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb]{revtex4}
15: % Some other (several out of many) possibilities
16: %\documentclass[preprint,aps]{revtex4}
17: %\documentclass[preprint,aps,draft]{revtex4}
18: %\documentclass[prb]{revtex4}% Physical Review B
19: % Include figure files
20: % Align table columns on decimal point
21: % bold math
22: %\nofiles
23:
24:
25: \documentclass[twocolumn,showpacs,preprintnumbers]{revtex4}
26: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
27: \usepackage{amsmath}
28: \usepackage{graphicx}
29: \usepackage{dcolumn}
30: \usepackage{bm}
31:
32: \setcounter{MaxMatrixCols}{10}
33: %TCIDATA{OutputFilter=LATEX.DLL}
34: %TCIDATA{Version=4.00.0.2312}
35: %TCIDATA{LastRevised=Thursday, December 11, 2003 11:48:58}
36: %TCIDATA{<META NAME="GraphicsSave" CONTENT="32">}
37: %TCIDATA{Language=American English}
38:
39: \input{tcilatex}
40:
41: \begin{document}
42:
43: \preprint{APS/123-QED}
44: \title{Modelling of SARS for Hong Kong}
45: \author{Pengliang Shi}
46: \email{pengliangshi@yahoo.com}
47: \author{Michael Small}
48: \affiliation{Department of Electronic and Information Engineering, The Hong Kong
49: Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong}
50: \date{\today }
51:
52: \begin{abstract}
53: A simplified susceptible-infected-recovered (SIR) epidemic model and a
54: small-world model are applied to analyse the spread and control of Severe
55: Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) for Hong Kong in early 2003. From data
56: available in mid April 2003, we predict that SARS would be controlled by
57: June and nearly 1700 persons would be infected based on the SIR model. This
58: is consistent with the known data. A simple way to evaluate the development
59: and efficacy of control is described and shown to provide a useful measure
60: for the future evolution of an epidemic. This may contribute to improve
61: strategic response from the government. The evaluation process here is
62: universal and therefore applicable to many similar homogeneous epidemic
63: diseases within a fixed population. A novel model consisting of map systems
64: involving the Small-World network principle is also described. We find that
65: this model reproduces qualitative features of the random disease propagation
66: observed in the true data. Unlike traditional deterministic models,
67: scale-free phenomena are observed in the epidemic network. The numerical
68: simulations provide theoretical support for current strategies and achieve
69: more efficient control of some epidemic diseases, including SARS.
70: \end{abstract}
71:
72: \pacs{89.75.Hc, 87.23.Ge}
73: \keywords{SARS, SIR, Small-World, epidemic}
74: \maketitle
75:
76: During 2003 SARS killed 916 and infected 8422 globally\cite{WHO1}. In Hong
77: Kong (HK), one of the most severely affected regions, 1755 individuals were
78: infected and 299 died\cite{HK1}. SARS is caused by a coronavirus, which is
79: more dangerous and tenacious than the AIDS virus because of its strong
80: ability to survive in moist air and considerable potential to infect through
81: close personal contact\cite{Lawrence1,Ksiazek1,Drosten1,Peiris1}. Unlike
82: other well-known epidemic diseases, such as AIDS, SARS spreads quickly.
83: Although significant, its mortality rate is, fortunately, relatively low
84: (approximately 11\%)\cite{WHO1}. Researchers have decoded the genome of SARS
85: coronavirus and developed prompt diagnostic tests and some medicines, a
86: vaccine is still far from being developed and widely used\cite%
87: {Marra1,Rota1,Stadler1}. The danger of a recurrence of SARS remains.
88:
89: Irrespective of pharmacological research, the epidemiology study of SARS
90: will help to prevent possible spreading of similar future contagions.
91: Generally, current epidemiological models are of two types. First, the
92: well-known Susceptible-Infected-Recovered (SIR) model proposed in 1927\cite%
93: {Kermack1,Daley1}. Second, the concept of Small-World (SW)\ networks\cite%
94: {Watts1}. Arousing a new wave of epidemiological research, the SW model has
95: made some progress recently\cite{Damian1,Holl1,Mode1}. Our work aims to
96: model SARS data for HK. Practical advice for a better control are drawn from
97: both the SIR and SW models. In particular, a generalized method to evaluate
98: control of an epidemic is promoted here based on the SIR model with fixed
99: population. Using this method, measuring the spread and control of various
100: epidemics among different\ countries becomes simple. Quick action in the
101: early stage is highlighted for both government and individuals to prevent
102: rapid propagation.
103:
104: \section{Susceptible-Infected-Recovered model}
105:
106: In the SIR model, the fixed population $N$ is divided into three distinct
107: groups: Susceptible $S$, Infected $I$ and Removed $R$. Those at risk of the
108: disease are susceptible, those that have it are infected and those that are
109: either quarantined, dead, or have acquired immunity are removed. The
110: following flow chart shows the basic procession of the SIR model \cite%
111: {Daley1}.%
112: \begin{equation}
113: \begin{array}{ccccc}
114: & rSI & & aI & \\
115: S & \rightarrow & I & \rightarrow & R%
116: \end{array}
117: \label{SIR1}
118: \end{equation}%
119: Here $r$ and $a$ are the infection coefficient and removal rate,
120: respectively. A discrete model was adapted by Gani from the original SIR
121: model through the coarse-graining process and was applied to successfully
122: predict outbreak of influenza epidemics in England and Wales\cite%
123: {Gani1,Spicer1}.
124:
125: \begin{eqnarray}
126: S_{i+1} &=&S_{i}\left( 1-rI_{i}\right) \notag \\
127: I_{i+1} &=&\left[ rS_{i}+\left( 1-a\right) \right] I_{i} \label{SIR2} \\
128: R_{i+1} &=&R_{i}+aI_{i} \notag
129: \end{eqnarray}%
130: During the epidemic process, $N=S_{i}+I_{i}+R_{i}$ is fixed.
131:
132: Initially, we examine the data for the first 15 days to estimate the
133: parameters $r$ and $a$ of SARS for HK. The only data are new cases (removal $%
134: R$) announced everyday by HK Dept. of Health from March 12, 2003 followed by
135: a revised version later\cite{HK1}. To avoid inadvertently using future
136: information we do not use the revised data at this stage. Population $%
137: N=7.3\times 10^{6}$; since $I+R\ll N$ it is reasonable to let $S_{i}=N$ in
138: right hand side of (\ref{SIR2}). $I_{1}=1$ and $R_{1}=0$ is set as the
139: initial condition. $I_{i}$ is replaced with $R_{i-1}$ whereas $I_{i}$ is
140: uncertain. This assumption implies the incubation period is only one day, in
141: spite of the fact that the true incubation period of the coronavirus\ is 2-7
142: days\cite{Rota1}. The parameters $r$ and $a$ are scanned for the best fit
143: for the stage. For every $\left( r,a\right) $, a sequence of $%
144: R_{i+1}^{\prime }$ is obtained by numerical simulations. An Euclidean norm
145: of $\sum_{i=1}^{15}\left( R_{i+1}-R_{i+1}^{\prime }\right) ^{2}$, which
146: indicates a distance between the true and simulated data, is applied to
147: measure the fit. In Fig. \ref{graph1} $\left( r,a\right) $ of the lowest
148: point is the best fit parameters for this stage and this value is used for
149: the following prediction. We get $r=2.05\times 10^{-7}$ and $a=1.444$. The
150: method is applied to get parameters of $a$ and $r$ in Figs. \ref{graph2} and %
151: \ref{graph3}.
152:
153: \begin{figure}[h]
154: \centering\includegraphics[width=3.3in]{fig1.eps}
155: \caption{The quantity $\sum_{i=1}^{15}\left( R_{i+1}-R_{i+1}^{\prime
156: }\right) ^{2}$ vs. $r$ and $a$ is plotted as dots for the first 15 days SARS
157: data for HK. The natural logarithm is applied. $R$ and $R^{\prime }$ are
158: original and simulated data, respectively. The thick red curve shows the
159: bottom of the sharp valley clearly. The lowest point of the valley is
160: according to the best fit: $r=2.05\times 10^{-7}$ and $a=1.444$.}
161: \label{graph1}
162: \end{figure}
163:
164: The prediction is available for the trend based on parameters $r$ and $a$ of
165: this stage, the middle day (March 20, 2003) of the stage is applied as the
166: first day and $\overline{R}=\frac{1}{15}\sum_{i=1}^{15}R_{i+1}$ is assumed
167: as $\overline{I}$. A curve of squares is plotted in Fig. \ref{graph2} for
168: the first stage prediction. In the same way the best fit and prediction is
169: applied for the next two stages and plotted in Fig. \ref{graph2}. The best
170: fit is also processed weekly for detail discussion later.
171: \begin{figure}[h]
172: \centering\includegraphics[width=3.3in]{fig2.eps}
173: \caption{SARS data announced daily by the Hong Kong Dept. of Heath, the
174: epidemic curve is plot as column graph. The curves of squares ($r=2.05\times
175: 10^{-7}$ and $a=1.444$), circles ($r=1.55\times 10^{-7}$ and $a=1.172$) and
176: triangles ($r=1.09\times 10^{-7}$ and $a=0.868$) are prediction for the 3
177: stages described in the text. Each stage has 15 days. The curve of black
178: dots is for revised data.}
179: \label{graph2}
180: \end{figure}
181:
182: The curves for prediction clearly shows the 3 stages in Fig. \ref{graph2}.
183: The first stage (March 12 - 27, 2003) exhibits dangerous exponential growth.
184: It shows that the extremely infectious SARS coronavirus spread quickly in
185: the public with few protections during this early stage. More seriously, it
186: leads to a higher infection peak although in this stage the averaged number
187: of new cases $\overline{R}$ is below 30. This prediction gets confirmation
188: in the second stage (March 28 - April 11, 2003). The peak characterized by
189: the Amoy Garden outbreak comes earlier and higher. It indicates appearance
190: of a new transmission mode that differs from intimate contact route observed
191: in the first stage. We name the new transmission mode $explosive$ growth in
192: the contrast to transmission in the first stage which we refer to as $%
193: burning $ growth. Outbreaks at Prince Wales Hospital (PWH) (where SARS
194: patients received treatment) and Amoy Gardens (a high-density housing estate
195: in Hong Kong) represent infections of $burning$ and $explosive$ modes in the
196: full epidemic, respectively. The revised data provided by HK Dept. of Health
197: in Fig. \ref{graph2} present a clearer indication for these two transmission
198: modes. The outbreak of PWH sent the clear message that intimate contacts
199: with SARS patient led to infection\cite{Tomlinson1}. Detailed investigations
200: of the propagation at Amoy Garden suggested that faulty of sewerage pipes
201: allowed droplets containing the coronavirus to enter neighboring units
202: vertically in the building\cite{Riley1}. Furthermore, poor ventilation of
203: lifts and rat infestation where also suggested as possible modes of
204: contamination \cite{Normile1,Ng1,Helen1,Donnelly1}. However, control
205: measures bring the spread of the disease under control in the second stage.
206: Contrary to the increasing trend in the first stage, the prediction curve of
207: the 2nd stage (circle) declines. And it anticipates that new cases drop
208: below 10 before the 60th day (May 10, 2003). Also on April 12, 2003 we
209: predicted number of whole infection cases would reach 1700. Up to April 11,
210: 2003 there were 32 deaths and 169 recoveries\cite{HK1}. We calculated the
211: mortality of SARS as the ratio of death to sum of both deathes and
212: recoveries, and it was 15.9\%. Therefore we predicted approximately 270
213: fatalities in total. In the third stage (April 12 - 27, 2003), triangle
214: curve in Fig. \ref{graph2} refines results and gives more accurate
215: prediction. This stage predicts that new cases per day drops to 5 before the
216: 62th day, May 12, 2003. The travel warning for HK was cancelled by WHO
217: because HK had kept new cases below 5 for 10 days since May 15, 2003. And,
218: finally, we predict that the total cases reaches 1730 and nearly 287 deaths
219: (up to April 27, 2003 there were 668 recovered and 133, the mortality
220: increased to 16.6\%). These numbers are very close to the true data\cite{HK1}%
221: . Precisely the method drawn from the SIR model has been verified for
222: prediction for full epidemic. However, the accuracy is only possible by the
223: first dividing the epidemic into separate "stages".
224:
225: This problem of determining to what extent an epidemic is under control is
226: of greater strategic significance. Information on the efficacy of epidemic
227: control will help determine whether to apply more control policies or not,
228: and balance cost and benefit from them.\ For each individual the same
229: question will also inform the degree to which precautions are taken: i.e.
230: wearing a surgical mask to prevent the spread (acquisition) of SARS.
231: Obviously a way to estimate control level is required. Actually this is a
232: difficult problem because of significant statistical fluctuations in the
233: data. A quite simple method to evaluate control efficiency is discussed
234: below.
235:
236: In the SIR model (\ref{SIR2}), if $\Delta I=I_{i+1}-I_{i}\leq 0$ a disease
237: is regards as being controlled as new cases will decrease. This inequality
238: leads to a control criterion for some diseases in epidemiology research.
239: Applying the approximation of $S_{i}=N$ we get a threshold $Nr\leq a$ from (%
240: \ref{SIR2}). We rescale $rN\rightarrow r$ ($r$ is called infection rate in
241: place of infection coefficient now) and then get the threshold that is free
242: from population $N$.%
243: \begin{equation}
244: r\leq a \label{SIR3}
245: \end{equation}%
246: This indicates that the removal rate $a$ exceeds the infection rate $r$. In
247: Fig. \ref{graph3} the circles show the 3 stages evaluations with dash line
248: of $r=a$. And the parameters $r$ and $a$ of SARS\ data for HK are estimated
249: weekly as squares also in Fig. \ref{graph3}. The line of $r=a$ is regarded
250: as the critical line since number of infected cases increases when $\left(
251: r,a\right) $ passes through it from below. It is possible to apply the
252: diagram of $r$ and $a$ to compare control level for different countries and
253: areas even for different diseases. This provides organizations like WHO with
254: a simple and standard method to supervise infection\ level of any disease.
255: The limitation of the method comes from the assumptions of the SIR model.
256: More accurate models may provide better estimate of epidemic state and
257: future behaviours.
258:
259: \begin{figure}[h]
260: \centering\includegraphics[width=3.3in]{fig3.eps}
261: \caption{The best fit\ parameters estimated week by week from SARS data of
262: HK are plotted as squares. The circles are for 3-stage analysis mentioned in
263: Fig. \protect\ref{graph2}. In this panel the line of dots $r=a$ is regarded
264: as \textquotedblleft alert line\textquotedblright\ or \textquotedblleft
265: critical line\textquotedblright . The parameters of $r$ and $a$ below it
266: indicate that the epidemic is controlled, above the line indicates
267: uncontrolled growth. The parameter $r$ is rescaled by $rN\rightarrow r$.}
268: \label{graph3}
269: \end{figure}
270:
271: In summary, a discrete SIR model gives good predictions for epidemic of SARS
272: for HK. Two distinct methods are described for the disease propagation
273: dynamics. Particularly the $explosive$ mode is much more hazardous than the $%
274: burning$ mode. We have introduced a simple method to evaluate control
275: levels. The method is generic and can be widely applied to various
276: epidemiological data.
277:
278: \section{The small-world model}
279:
280: Contrary to the long established SIR model, epidemiology research using
281: Small-World (SW) network models is young and growing area. The concept of SW
282: was imported from the study of social network into nature sciences in 1998%
283: \cite{Watts1}. However, it provides a novel insight for networks and\
284: arouses a lot of explorations in the brain, social networks and the Internet.%
285: \cite{Laughlin1,Albert1,Ebel1,Liljeros1}. Some SW networks also exhibit a
286: scale-free (power law) distribution: a node in this network has probability $%
287: P(k)\sim k^{-\gamma }$ to connect $k$ nodes, $\gamma $ is one basic
288: character for the system\cite{Albert1,Newman1,Ebel1,Liljeros1}. Most
289: researches of \textquotedblleft virus\textquotedblright\ spreading with the
290: SW model, concern the propagation of computer viruses on the Internet,
291: however, a few studies have been published relating to epidemiology\cite%
292: {Ebel1,Liljeros1,Strogatz1,Kuperman1,Huerta1}. The dynamics of SW models
293: enriches our realization of epidemic and possibly provides better control
294: policies\cite{Miramontes1}. From the first SARS patient to the last one, an
295: epidemic chain is embedded on the scale free SW network of social contacts.
296: It is of great importance to discover the underlying structure of the
297: epidemic network because a successful quarantine of all possible candidates
298: for infection will lead to a rapid termination of the epidemic. In HK
299: e-SARS, an electronic database to capture on-line and in real time clinical
300: and administrative details of all SARS patients, provided invaluable
301: quarantine information by tracing contacts\cite{HK1,Brower1}. Unfortunately
302: a full epidemic network of SARS for HK is still unavailable. Because data
303: representing the underlying network structure is currently not available, we
304: have no choice other than numerical simulations. Therefore, our analysis of
305: the SW model is largely theoretical. The only confirmation of our model we
306: can offer is that the data appear to be realistic and exhibit the same
307: features as the true epidemic data.
308:
309: To simulate an epidemic chain, a simple model of social contacts is proposed
310: . The model is established on a grid network weaved by $m$ parallel and $m$
311: vertical lines. Every node in the network represents a person. We set $%
312: m=2700 $ with population $N=m^{2}=7.29\times 10^{6}$. All nodes are
313: initiated with a value of 0 (named $good$ nodes). Every node has 2, 3 or 4
314: nearest neighbors as short range contacts for corner, edge and center,
315: respectively. For every node there are two long range contacts with 2 other
316: nodes randomly selected in the whole system everyday. These linkages model
317: the social contact between individuals (i.e. social contacts that are
318: sufficiently intimate to bring individuals at risk of spreading the
319: disease). One random node of the system is set to 1 (called the $bad$ node),
320: through its short and long range contacts, the value of the nodes linked
321: with it turns into 1 according to probability of $p_{1}$ and $p_{2}$,
322: respectively. An infection happens if a node changes its value from 0 to 1.
323: This change is irreversible. During the full simulation process, the bad
324: node is not removed from the whole system. We make this assumption because
325: the number of deaths is small in comparision of the population, and there is
326: no absolute quarantine---even the SARS patient in hospital can affect the
327: medical workers. Moreover, the treatment period for SARS is relatively
328: length, and during this time infected indviduals are highly infectious. To
329: reflect the true variation in control strategy and individual behaviour, the
330: control parameters $p_{1,2}$ ($0\leq p_{1,2}\leq 1$) vary with time.
331:
332: \begin{figure}[h]
333: \centering\includegraphics[width=3.3in]{fig4.eps}
334: \caption{A plague is simulated in a geographical map with $100\times 100$
335: nodes with fixed infection probability $p_{1,2}=0.005$ which eventually
336: leads to a full infection. a). The full epidemic curve of the simulated
337: epidemic. b). While time is 45, the infection cases clusteringly scatter in
338: the map. The infection happens in full scale map because\ of random
339: connections. The clusters show effect from the nearest neighbour
340: connections. }
341: \label{graph4}
342: \end{figure}
343:
344: In same model it would be interesting to compare with the complete infection
345: epidemic. A small system with $100\times 100$ nodes is chosen. A fixed
346: probability\ $p_{1}=p_{2}=0.05$ leads to eventual infection of the entire
347: population since all nodes are linked and the infected are not removed. The
348: epidemic curve for this process is plotted in Fig. \ref{graph4} a) and is
349: typical of many plagues. In Fig. \ref{graph4} b) various sizes of clusters
350: with infected nodes (black dots) scatter over the geographical map. It
351: contains all infection facts in first 45 days. Comparing to the true SARS
352: infection distribution in HK only slight similarity is observed. The short
353: and long range linkages give good infection dynamics as we expected. The
354: epidemic chain is easily drawn by recording infection fact from the seed\ to
355: last patient. However, during simulations there is a problem: for a $good$
356: node linked by more than one $bad$ nodes, which $bad$ node infects it? A
357: widely accepted preferential attachment of \textit{rich-get-richer} is a
358: good answer\cite{Albert1,Newman1,Watts2}. A linear preference function is
359: applied here. With presence of both growth and preferential attachment, it
360: is general to ask whether the chain is a scale-invariant SW network. We plot
361: the distribution in Fig. \ref{graph5} a) and b) in log-log and log-linear
362: coordinates, respectively. The hollow circle is for the system with $%
363: 100\times 100$ nodes. The scaling behaviour of it looks more like a
364: piecewise linear (i.e. bilinear) in b) rather than a power law in a). To
365: confirm this we tried a larger system with $1000\times 1000$ nodes and the
366: same\ fixed $p_{1,2}$ in the rest curves in Figs. \ref{graph5}. The solid
367: square curve is distribution of the whole epidemic network. The linear fit
368: for the solid square gives a correlation coefficient $R$ of $-0.956$ in Fig. %
369: \ref{graph5} a). In b) piecewise linear fits have $R$ of $-0.997$ and $%
370: -0.994 $. These provide positive support for the original model. The ratio
371: of the cases of first 30\% and 1\% of whole process for this bigger system
372: are plotted as hollow triangle and solid circle curves in Figs. \ref{graph5}%
373: , respectively. The case of 1\%, early stage of full infection epidemic,
374: suggests a better fit for scale-free than the other cases since it has
375: correlation coefficients $R$ of $-0.983$ and ratio $\gamma =-2.89$ for
376: linear fit in a). For the solid circle curve piecewise linear fits give $R$
377: of $-0.995$ and $-0.977$ in Fig. \ref{graph5} b). So, what scaling behaviour
378: is true during full infection process? With absence of rigorous proof this
379: problem is hard to answer correctly in simulations. We may only draw
380: conclusions based on which simulations most closely matches the qualitative
381: features of the observed data.
382:
383: \begin{figure}[h]
384: \centering\includegraphics[width=3.3in]{fig5.eps}
385: \caption{The scaling behaviour for a full infection epidemic network is
386: plotted in log-log and log-linear coordinates in a) and b), respectively.
387: The circle is for a full infection epidemic network simulated in a
388: geographical map with $100\times 100$ nodes. The curves are for one with $%
389: 1000\times 1000$ nodes. The curves of dots, triangles and squares are for
390: the epidemic networks of 1\% , 30\% and 100\% for full infection process.
391: The two dash lines are piecewise linear fits for the full infection process
392: with $1000\times 1000$ nodes. The ratio is $-0.31$ and $-0.07$ with $%
393: R=-0.997 $ and $-0.994$, respectively. It clearly shows the curves of full
394: epidemic has two piecewise linear parts in log-linear graph. In the early
395: stage of a full infection, the scaling behaviour of 1\% infected (dots) has
396: a part which might be regards as a log-log linear. The ratio of it is $-2.89$
397: with $R=-0.983$. In other words, it has scale-free part with $\protect\gamma %
398: =-2.89 $.}
399: \label{graph5}
400: \end{figure}
401:
402: Let's return to the system with $2700\times 2700$ nodes for modelling SARS
403: for HK. The probability $p_{1,2}$ is fitted to the true epidemic data.
404: However, it is fruitless to obtain an exact coincidence between the
405: simulated results and the true data as the model evolution is highly random
406: (moreover this would result in overfitting). The control parameters $p_{1,2}$
407: (dots and dashes curves)\ and a simulated epidemic curve (black dots) with
408: column diagram of SARS for HK is plotted in Figs. \ref{graph6} a) and b),
409: respectively. For the simulated data, the total number of cases is 1830 that
410: has a 4.3\% deviation from the true data of 1755. Contrary to the above full
411: infection with fixed parameters, $p_{1,2}$ are believed to drop
412: exponentially and lead to small part infection epidemic without quarantine
413: or removal. In any case, the high probability of infection in the early
414: stage is indicative of the critical ability of the SARS coronavirus to
415: attack an individual without protection. If SARS returns, the same high
416: initial infection level is likely to occur. The only hope to avoid a repeat
417: of the SARS crisis of 2003 is to shorten the high infection stage by quick
418: identification, wide protection and sufficient quarantining. In other words,
419: the best time to eliminate possible epidemic is the moment that the first
420: patient surfaces. Any delay may lead to a worsening crisis. The long range
421: infections in the model and the world also imply an efficient mechanism to
422: respond rapidly to any infectious disease is required to establish global
423: control.
424:
425: \begin{figure}[h]
426: \centering\includegraphics[width=3.3in]{fig6.eps}
427: \caption{Control parameters and epidemic curve is plotted for the model with
428: $2700\times 2700$ nodes. a) The short and long range linkages infection
429: probability $p_{1,2}$ generally declines exponentially. b) The simulated
430: epidemic curve (black dots) in the model is plotted with the original SARS
431: data (grey column) for HK.}
432: \label{graph6}
433: \end{figure}
434: \begin{figure}[h]
435: \centering\includegraphics[width=3.3in]{fig7.eps}
436: \caption{The distribution of infected nodes in simulations in two
437: dimensional map. a). the whole geographical map; b). an amplified window of
438: a cluster marked in circle of a).}
439: \label{graph7}
440: \end{figure}
441:
442: Data on the geographical distribution of SARS cases in HK is much easier to
443: collect than the full epidemic chain. Numerical simulations provide both
444: simply. The full geographical map marked with all infected nodes (black
445: dots) and an amplified window of a cluster is plotted in Figs. \ref{graph7}
446: a) and b), respectively. Similarity is expected and verified in cluster
447: patterns of Figs. \ref{graph4} b). The scaling behaviour of the epidemic
448: chain is plotted in Figs. \ref{graph8}. The curve in log-log diagram
449: exhibits a power-law coefficient of $\gamma =-3.55$ and gives the linear fit
450: correlation coefficient $R=-0.989$. The piecewise linear fit for the
451: log-linear case gives correlation coefficients $R$ of $-0.987$ and $-0.959$,
452: respectively.
453: \begin{figure}[h]
454: \centering\includegraphics[width=3.3in]{fig8.eps}
455: \caption{The scaling behaviour for the simulated epidemic network. In
456: log-log coordinates, the scaling $P(k)\sim k^{-\protect\gamma }$, $\protect%
457: \gamma =-3.55$, where the linear fit exhibits a correlation coefficient $%
458: R=-0.989$.}
459: \label{graph8}
460: \end{figure}
461:
462: For a SW network often few vertexes play more important roles than others%
463: \cite{Watts2}. SARS super-spreaders found in HK, Singapore and China are
464: consistent with this\cite{Riley1,Leo1}. Data for the early spreading of SARS
465: in Singapore\cite{Leo1} show definite SW structure with a small number of
466: nodes with a large number of links. The average number of links per node
467: also shows a scale-free structure \cite{Leo1}, but the available data is
468: extremely limited (the linear scaling can only be estimated from three
469: observations).
470:
471: This character is also verified in our model. The first few nodes have a
472: high chance of infecting a large number of individuals. In Fig. \ref{graph8}%
473: , a single node has 40 links.\ Clearly the index node has many long range
474: linkages. It has been suggested that travelling in crowded public places
475: (train, hospital, even an elevator) without suitable precautions can cause
476: an ordinary SARS patient to infect a significant number of others. Again,
477: this is an indication that to increase an individual's (especially a
478: probable SARS patient's) personal protection is key to rapidly control an
479: epidemic. Actually, in our model, if duration of the early stage with high
480: probability $p_{1,2}$ is reduced to less than 10, the infection scale
481: decreases sharply.
482:
483: An engrossing phenomenon is the points of inflection in curves in log-linear
484: diagrams of Figs. \ref{graph8} and Figs. \ref{graph5} b). All are located
485: near linkages number of 6-7. On average a nodes has about 6 contacts (2-4
486: short plus 2 long range) every day, although in whole process there is no
487: limitation for linkages. For a growing random network, a general problem
488: always exists among its scaling behaviour, preferential attachment and
489: dynamics, even embedding a geographical map\cite%
490: {Cohen1,Warren1,Krapivsky1,Dorogovtsev1,Moore1}. More work is required to
491: address this issue.
492:
493: In conclusion a SW epidemic network is simulated to model SARS spreading in
494: HK. A comparison of the simulations with full infection data is presented.
495: Our discussion of the infection probability and occurrence of super
496: spreaders lead to the obvious conclusion: rapid response of an individual
497: and government is a key to eliminating an epidemic with limited impact and
498: at minimal cost.
499:
500: \begin{acknowledgments}
501: This research is supported by Hong Kong University Grants Council CERG
502: number B-Q709.
503: \end{acknowledgments}
504:
505: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
506: \bibitem{WHO1} World Health Organization, \textit{Consensus Document on the
507: Epidemiology of SARS}, 17 Oct., 2003,
508: http://www.who.int/csr/sars/en/WHOconsensus.pdf.
509:
510: \bibitem{HK1} \textit{Report of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Expert
511: Committee}, 2 Oct., 2003, HK.
512: http://www.sars-expertcom.gov.hk/english/reports/reports.html.
513:
514: \bibitem{Lawrence1} D. Lawrence, The Lancet \textbf{361}, 1712 (2003).
515:
516: \bibitem{Ksiazek1} T. G. Ksiazek, et al. New Engl. J. Med. \textbf{348},
517: 1953 (2003).
518:
519: \bibitem{Drosten1} C. Drosten, et al. New Engl. J. Med.; \textbf{348}, 1967
520: (2003).
521:
522: \bibitem{Peiris1} J. S. M. Peiris, et al. The Lancet \textbf{361}, 1319
523: (2003).
524:
525: \bibitem{Marra1} M. A. Marra, et al. Science \textbf{300}, 1399 (2003).
526:
527: \bibitem{Rota1} P. A. Rota, et al. Science \textbf{300}, 1394 (2003).
528:
529: \bibitem{Stadler1} K. Stadler, et al. Nature Rev. Microbio. \textbf{1}, 209
530: (2003).
531:
532: \bibitem{Kermack1} W. O. Kermack \& A. G. McKerdrick, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond.
533: A \textbf{115}, 700 (1927).
534:
535: \bibitem{Daley1} D. J. Daley, \& J. Gani, \textit{Epidemic Modelling: An
536: Introduction}, (Cambridge Univ. press, Cambridge, 1999).
537:
538: \bibitem{Watts1} D. J. Watts, \& S. H. Strogatz, Nature \textbf{393}, 440
539: (1998).
540:
541: \bibitem{Damian1} H. Z. Dami\'{a}n \& K. Marcelo, Physica A \textbf{309},
542: 445 (2002).
543:
544: \bibitem{Holl1} J. Holl, et al. Nature \textbf{423}, 605 (2003).
545:
546: \bibitem{Mode1} C. J. Mode \& C. K. Sleeman, Math. Biosc. \textbf{156}, 95
547: (1999).
548:
549: \bibitem{Gani1} J. Gani, J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. A \textbf{141}, 323
550: (1978).
551:
552: \bibitem{Spicer1} C. C. Spicer, Brit. Med. Bull. \textbf{35}, 23 (1979).
553:
554: \bibitem{Tomlinson1} B. Tomlinson, \& C. Cockram, The Lancet \textbf{361},
555: 1486 (2003).
556:
557: \bibitem{Riley1} S. Riley, et al. Science \textbf{300}, 1961 (2003).
558:
559: \bibitem{Normile1} D. Normile, Science \textbf{300}, 714 (2003).
560:
561: \bibitem{Ng1} S. K C. Ng, The Lancet \textbf{362}, 570 (2003).
562:
563: \bibitem{Donnelly1} C. A. Donnelly, et al. The Lancet \textbf{361}, 1761
564: (2003).
565:
566: \bibitem{Helen1} P. Helen, Nature, 15 April (2003).
567: http://www.nature.com/nsu/030414/030414-5.html.
568:
569: \bibitem{Laughlin1} S. B. Laughlin, \& T. J. Sejnowski, Science \textbf{301}%
570: , 1870 (2003).
571:
572: \bibitem{Albert1} R. Albert, \& A.-L. Barab\'{a}si, Rev. Mod. Phys. \textbf{%
573: 74}, 47 (2002).
574:
575: \bibitem{Newman1} M. Newman, Phys. Rev. E \textbf{64}, 025102 (2001).
576:
577: \bibitem{Ebel1} H. Ebel, et al. Phys. Rev. E \textbf{66}, 035103 (2002).
578:
579: \bibitem{Liljeros1} F. Liljeros, et al. Nature \textbf{411}, 907 (2001).
580:
581: \bibitem{Strogatz1} S. H. Strogatz, Nature \textbf{410}, 268 (2001)
582:
583: \bibitem{Kuperman1} M. Kuperman, \& G. Abramson, Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{86}%
584: , 2909 (2001).
585:
586: \bibitem{Huerta1} R. Huerta, \& L. S. Tsimring, Phys. Rev. E \textbf{66},
587: 056115 (2002).
588:
589: \bibitem{Miramontes1} O. Miramontes, \& B. Luque, Physica D \textbf{168-169}%
590: , 379 (2002).
591:
592: \bibitem{Brower1} V. Brower, EMBO Reports \textbf{4}, 649 (2003).
593:
594: \bibitem{Cohen1} R. Cohen, \& S. Havlin, Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{90},
595: 058701 (2003).
596:
597: \bibitem{Watts2} D. J. Watts, \textit{Small Worlds: The Dynamics of Networks
598: between Order and Randomness}, (Princeton Univ. press, Princeton, 1999).
599:
600: \bibitem{Leo1} Y. S. Leo, MMWR Weekly \textbf{52}, 405 (2003).
601:
602: \bibitem{Warren1} C. P. Warren, et al. Phys. Rev. E \textbf{66}, 056105
603: (2002).
604:
605: \bibitem{Krapivsky1} P. L. Krapivsky, et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{85},
606: 4629 (2000).
607:
608: \bibitem{Dorogovtsev1} S. N. Dorogovtsev, \& J. F. F. Mendes, Phys. Rev. E
609: \textbf{63}, 056125 (2001).
610:
611: \bibitem{Moore1} C. Moore, \& M. E. J. Newman, Phys. Rev. E \textbf{62},
612: 7059 (2000).
613: \end{thebibliography}
614:
615: \end{document}
616: