1: %\documentclass[amssymb]{jarticle}
2:
3: %\documentclass[twocolumn,showpacs,preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb]{revtex4}
4: \documentclass[12pt,fleqn]{article}
5: %\documentclass[preprint,showpacs,preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb]{revtex4}
6: %\documentstyle[aps,psfig,epsfig,rmp,multicol]{revtex4}
7:
8: %\documentclass[preprint,aps]{revtex4}
9: %\documentclass[preprint,aps,draft]{revtex4}
10: %\documentclass[prb]{revtex4}% Physical Review E
11:
12: \usepackage{graphicx}% Include figure files
13: \usepackage{dcolumn}% Align table columns on decimal point
14: \usepackage{bm}% bold math
15: \usepackage{amsmath}
16: \usepackage{amssymb}
17: \usepackage{subfigure}
18: \usepackage{psfig,float}
19: %\nofiles
20: \def\OMIT#1{}
21: \begin{document}
22:
23: \title{Universal collective fluctuations in gene expression dynamics from yeast to human}
24:
25:
26: \author{J.C. Nacher{\footnote{These authors contributed equally to this work. \newline
27: Corresponding authors: nacher@kuicr.kyoto-u.ac.jp, ochiai@kuicr.kyoto-u.ac.jp
28: }}, T. Ochiai{\footnotemark[1]}, T. Akutsu}
29:
30: \maketitle
31:
32: \begin{center}
33: {\it Bioinformatics Center, Institute for Chemical Research, Kyoto University, }\end{center}
34: \begin{center}
35: {\it Uji, 611-0011, Japan}
36: \end{center}
37:
38:
39: \begin{center}
40: PACS number :
41: 89.75.-k, 87.14.Gg, 87.15.Aa, 87.15.Vv
42: \end{center}
43:
44: \begin{center}
45:
46: Keywords : Gene expression, Biomolecules, Stochastic models, Fluctuations
47: \end{center}
48:
49: \begin{abstract}
50: {\small{
51: In this work, the dynamics of fluctuations in gene expression time series is investigated. By
52: using collected data of gene expression from yeast and human organisms, we found that
53: the fluctuations of gene expression level and its average value over time are strongly
54: correlated and obey a scaling law. As this feature is found in yeast and human organisms, it suggests
55: that probably this coupling is a common dynamical organizing property of all living systems. To understand
56: these observations, we propose a stochastic model which can explain these collective fluctuations, and
57: predict the scaling exponent. Interestingly, our results indicate that the observed scaling law emerges
58: from the self-similarity symmetry embedded in gene
59: expression fluctuations.
60: %Furthermore, we discuss the implications of these findings in the context of the cell dynamics.
61: }}
62: \end{abstract}
63:
64:
65: %\newpage
66: %\tableofcontents
67: %\newpage
68:
69: \section{Introduction}
70:
71: Latest advances and discoveries in network science \cite{doro,bara} has made it possible to obtain a huge
72: understanding of the topology of biological complex systems. However, the acquired knowledge
73: is restricted by time, as far as the studies focussed mainly on topological-{\it spatial} properties
74: of the networks. More recently, some studies have dealt with this issue by unifying
75: the study of spatial- and time-dependent observables in networks (systems) in order
76: to simultaneously investigate the collective
77: behaviour of tens thousand nodes (elements of the systems). In particular, some works
78: studied the fluctuations dynamics in natural and technological transport networks \cite{m1,m2}, and described
79: the relationship among the flux fluctuations and the average of flux as a scaling-law. On the biological side, experimental
80: and theoretical works have also shown that some macroscopic phenomena, as the scale-free distribution, observed
81: in gene expression systems (i.e., abundance of mRNA of a gene) emerges
82: as a consequence of dynamical and collective self-organizing properties of the system \cite{ueda,ochi}.
83:
84:
85: In our post-genomic era, DNA microarrays, also known as BioChips and GeneChips, have become
86: the latest and most efficient method to simultaneously analyze thousands of genes \cite{chip1,chip2}. By using these
87: technologies, the amount of mRNA contained in cells from different tissues and organisms
88: can be collected at different time points. Moreover, the abundance of mRNA of a
89: gene (i.e., gene expression) fluctuates in time, and it reveals correlations
90: among many genes. Although there are currently many efforts to understand the gene regulation
91: and transcriptional control, we have only a limited knowledge of these processes due to
92: the huge quantity of genes involved and their intrinsic complexity. In order to obtain a better
93: description on the collective behaviour of thousands of genes, we search for dynamical
94: organizing principles in gene expression fluctuations, which are common for
95: all living organisms. In particular, we analyse the coupling between the
96: average on time of gene expression value $m$ and fluctuation $\sigma$
97: (i.e., standard deviation) of individual genes, from yeast \cite{cho1} and human \cite{cho2} organisms. Our results
98: indicate
99: that these magnitudes of gene expression system are related each other
100: and depend on a scaling law $\sigma\propto m^\alpha$ with exponent one $\alpha=1$. Intriguingly, the same scaling-law was
101: found in \cite{m1} for natural and transport systems as rivers, WWW or highways.
102:
103:
104: To explain this observation found in gene expression systems, we developed a
105: theoretical model based on stochastic processes. The general strategy is
106: as follows. First, we classified the genes from yeast \cite{cho1} and human \cite{cho2} organisms by
107: the average value of expression level $m$. All the genes which expression level fluctuates
108: around a given $m$ value will belong to the same
109: group. Simultaneously, we assume that the gene expression dynamics
110: of each group obeys the Markov property \cite{ochi,kampen}. Secondly, by using the short time transition
111: probability (properly defined later), we construct the stochastic model for gene expression level. Lastly, we
112: solve the model and obtain the same scaling-law observed experimentally. In addition, the relevant
113: scaling-exponent is predicted successfully. The crucial point is that our stochastic approach reveals the existence of the
114: self-similar symmetry embedded in the gene expression fluctuations, and the observed scaling-law emerges from this symmetry \cite{ochi2}.
115:
116: \section{Gene expression time series data}
117: We used experimental data from two well-known experiments
118: on absolute gene expression from yeast \cite{cho1} and human \cite{cho2} organisms. The first
119: experiment analysed cell cycle of the budding yeast {\it S. Cerevisiae}, where around 6220 genes
120: were monitored. Data of absolute value of gene expression fluctuations were collected
121: at 17 time points every 10 min intervals. Data was obtained from WWW site {\it http://genomics.standford.edu}.
122:
123:
124: The second experiment identifies
125: cell-cycle-regulated transcripts in human cells using high-density oligonucleotide
126: arrays. Data are collected every 2 hours for 24 hours, what is equivalent
127: to almost 2 full cell cycles. The number of genes monitored was around
128: 35000, and data for absolute value of gene expression fluctuations was
129: obtained from WWW site \\
130: {\it http://www.salk.edu/docs/labs/chipdata}. Further details
131: about the experimental set up can be found in \cite{cho1} and \cite{cho2}, respectively.
132:
133: In Fig. 1, we show the experimental absolute value of gene expression level (vertical axis) vs. time (horizontal axis)
134: of a selected group of genes which belong to human organism \cite{cho2}. We see that the gene expression
135: value of the selected genes fluctuates around the mean value $m$=6000 and $m$=1000.
136:
137:
138: \section{Fluctuation observables: average and standard deviation of gene expression}
139: By using the yeast and human data on gene expression time series,
140: we proceed as follows. First, we calculate the average expression value of each gene of yeast datasets \cite{cho1} and human datasets
141: \cite{cho2}. This expression reads as:
142: \begin{equation}
143: m=\frac{\sum_{t=1}^{T} g_t}{T},
144: \end{equation}
145: where $g_t$ means the absolute expression level of gene at time step $t$, and $T$ is the total
146: number of time steps. Secondly, we calculate the standard deviation (i.e., dispersion) of each gene by using
147: the following expression:
148: \begin{equation}
149: \sigma=\sqrt{\frac{1}{T}\sum_{t=1}^{T}(g_t-m)^2}.
150: \end{equation}
151: Therefore, for the yeast organism, we obtain 6220 dataset of coupled pairs ($\sigma$, $m$), and 35120 for the human organism.
152:
153: \section{Experimental observations}
154: By plotting the pairs ($\sigma$, $m$) of yeast and human after some binning of the data, we find that
155: the following scaling law between fluctuations and average of expression level over time :
156: \begin{equation}
157: \sigma\propto m^\alpha,
158: \end{equation}
159: where the scaling exponent is one ($\alpha=1$) .
160:
161:
162: We show these results in Fig. 2(left) (human) and Fig. 2(right) (yeast).
163: %Due to the large number of data, a huge overlapping exists among many data (red circles). To capture the
164: %dominant tendency of the fluctuations dynamics, data were binned into intervals of ten values of
165: %average of gene expression (x axis). The result of this binning is shown in blue circles.
166: Both
167: organisms (human and yeast) obeys the same scaling-law $\sigma\propto m^\alpha$ with exponent $\alpha=1$. The
168: scaling-law indicates that genes with higher expression level fluctuate more, and in addition,
169: the fluctuation size depends linearly on the mean expression value $m$. Therefore, this
170: scaling-law is a macroscopic and collective effect
171: of the fluctuations shown in Fig. 1
172:
173: It is worth noticing
174: that recent works have reported about this type of scaling law between
175: the average of flux and fluctuations in non-biological systems \cite{m1,m2}. In particular, similar
176: observations were found in natural transportation systems as river network, and artificial ones
177: as WWW and highways \cite{m1}. Intriguingly, these systems show
178: the same scaling exponent ($\alpha=1$) that we have also found for gene expression fluctuation
179: in yeast and human organisms. In contrast, more
180: technological systems as Internet routers and Microchips, revealed a scaling law with exponent 1/2.
181:
182:
183:
184:
185:
186: %In \cite{m1,m2}, the scaling exponent of Internet and Microchips is
187: %explained by arguing that internal fluctuations of the elements of the systems generate
188: %mainly this value of 1/2. In contrast, when a system reflects a scaling exponent $\alpha=1$, the influence
189: %of external fluctuations is far to be neglected and it plays the
190: %key role on the dynamics of the system. In other words, systems with scaling exponent $\alpha=1$ are
191: %mainly driven by external time dependent forces. In the same way as rivers fluctuations
192: % may be governed mainly by weather, World Wide Web traffic are driven by daily changes of web users,
193: % and highways traffic depends on the daily ratio of drivers and possibly of the weather season.
194:
195:
196: %By following this arguments, we may argue that a scaling exponent $\alpha=1$ for gene expression indicates
197: %that the metabolism of each organism drives the gene dynamics by demanding the appropriate fluctuations
198: %in order to balance the needs. Therefore, these external demands will change in time depending on the
199: %general condition of the whole organism.
200:
201:
202: In order to understand the origin of this self-organizing principle of gene dynamical systems, we have developed
203: a model based on a stochastic approach. This model reveals that the self-similarity symmetry (i.e., surprisingly,
204: the gene expression short-time fluctuations
205: contain a repeating pattern of smaller and smaller parts that are like the whole,
206: but different in size)
207: in the short-time transition probability reported in our companion
208: paper \cite{ochi2}, re-builds the observed scaling law $\sigma\propto m^\alpha$ with exponent $\alpha=1$. We
209: will explain the model in detail in next section.
210:
211: Finally, it important to remark that while the scaling exponent
212: ($\alpha=1$) seems to be universal, since as we will explain later, the self-similarity symmetry strongly constrains
213: the possible exponents to only $\alpha=1$, the universal nature of the exponent ($\alpha=1/2$)
214: is not clear enough as it is also discussed in \cite{m1}.
215:
216:
217: \section{The model }
218: \subsection{Stochastic process}
219: A stochastic process is one in which only the probability distribution
220: for future states can be specified, even given the exact knowledge of the present state. Although
221: there are many complex non-biological and biological systems which are not stochastic, for our
222: gene expression problem a probabilistic approach seems
223: plausible and natural. For example, the number of molecules which are involved in
224: signal transduction pathways fluctuates from $10^2 - 10^4$ and concurrently, the physical volumes of cells
225: are small. Furthermore, an additional source of randomness comes from instrumental noise,
226: which exceeds 30$\%$ from chip to chip (GeneChips arrays).
227:
228: Moreover, experimental and theoretical studies on stochastic noise and fluctuations of gene expression in cells
229: have recently been carried out by revealing an inherent ({\it intrinsic noise}) and external
230: ({\it extrinsic noise}) stochasticity \cite{kuz,elo}, and by providing a
231: huge knowledge of the mechanisms involved in subcellular processes.
232: \cite{paulsson, sato, blake, hasty}.
233:
234:
235: \subsection{Stochastic differential equation}
236: Let $\{X(t), 0 \le t <\infty \}$ be a stochastic process. For $(s>t)$ , the conditional probability
237: density function $p(y,s|x,t)=p(X(s)=y | X(t)=x )$ is defined as usual manner. For the matter of
238: convenience, we often write $p(y,s)$ for $p(y,s|x,t)$ .
239:
240: We make use of Ito Stochastic process in order to construct our model. First, we assume the following
241: Stochastic Differential Equation (SDE) (see also \cite{ochi2, wong, black} for further details):
242:
243: \begin{eqnarray}\label{eqn: SPDE}
244: dX^m(t)=\alpha^m(X^m(t)) dt + \beta^m(X^m(t))dW(t),
245: \end{eqnarray}
246: where stochastic variable $X^m(t)$ denotes the gene expression level of genes fluctuating around mean value $m$, $\alpha^m(x)$ denotes the drift (i.e. the average of the instantaneous transition of the expression level per unit of time) defined by
247: \begin{eqnarray}\label{eqn: initial condition}
248: \alpha^m(x)=\lim_{\epsilon \to 0}\frac{1}{\epsilon}\int (y-x) T_\epsilon^m(y,x) dy ,
249: \end{eqnarray}
250: $\beta^m(x)$ denotes the diffusion (i.e., the variance ofthe instantaneous transition the gene expression level per unit of time) defined by
251: \begin{eqnarray}
252: \beta^m(x)=\Bigl(\lim_{\epsilon \to 0}\frac{1}{\epsilon}\int (y-x)^2 T_\epsilon^m(y,x) dy\Bigr)^{\frac{1}{2}},
253: \end{eqnarray}
254: and $W(t)$ denotes the Wiener process \cite{kampen}. Here, $T_{\epsilon}^m(y,x)$ is an Instantaneous Transition
255: Probability (ITP) defined by $T_{\epsilon}^m(y,x) = p^m(y,t+\epsilon|x, t)$ for sufficient small $\epsilon$. Details
256: of the proof can be found in \cite{kampen}.
257:
258: \subsection{Experimental Input Data}
259: >From the data of $T_{\epsilon}^m(y,x)$, we can obtain $\alpha^m(x)$ and $\beta^m(x)$. We evaluate
260: these two magnitudes by using experimental data \cite{cho1,cho2} and Eqs. (5-6), and we observed
261: that behaviour of $\alpha^m(x)$ and $\beta^m(x)$ can be expressed by using the following functions:
262: \begin{eqnarray}\label{eqn: initial condition}
263: \alpha^m(x)=\mu(m-x),
264: \end{eqnarray}
265: \begin{eqnarray}\label{eqn: initial condition}
266: \beta^m(x)=m((x/m-1)^2+b).
267: \end{eqnarray}
268: Readers interested in details of derivation of Eqs. (7-8) are referred
269: to our companion manuscript \cite{ochi2}. These results obtained by
270: using experimental data are interesting since
271: expression level of genes follows the same
272: tendency independently of the scale of the
273: gene expression value (i.e., exhibiting a self-similar dynamics). In addition, same feature
274: has been found in a simple organism as yeast and in a complex one as human.
275:
276:
277: By substituting Eqs. (7-8) into Eq. (4), we obtain:
278: .
279: \begin{eqnarray}\label{eqn: SPDE}
280: dX^m(t)=\mu(m-X^m(t))dt + m((X^m(t)/m-1)^2+b)dW(t),
281: \end{eqnarray}
282: This equation is scale-invariant, since if we take different $m^{\prime}$, we recover the original Eq. (9) by substituting
283: $X^{m^\prime}(t) \rightarrow X^m(t) m^{\prime}/m$.
284:
285: \subsection{Solution of Stochastic Equation}
286: The solution of Eq. (9) is given by the following equation:
287: \begin{eqnarray}
288: \rho^m(x)=\frac{K}{m((x/m-1)^2+b)^2}\exp\Bigl(\frac{\mu}{(x/m-1)^2+b} \Bigr),
289: \end{eqnarray}
290: where $m$ is the mean value of gene expression for each gene, $b\approx 0.2-0.3$, and $\mu=1$. $\rho^m(x)$ indicates the
291: probability distribution of genes with expression level $x$ which fluctuates around mean value $m$. In \cite{ochi2}, we
292: find that Eq. (10) shows a good agreement with experimental data from yeast \cite{cho1} and human {\cite{cho2} organisms. Furthermore, the
293: formula $\rho^{cm}(x)=\frac{1}{c}\rho^m(x/c)$ holds for arbitrary real number $c$.
294:
295:
296: \subsection{ Fluctuation observables obtained by the model.}
297: \paragraph{Average value of gene expression}
298: By using Eq. (10), we can calculate the average expression value as follows:
299: \begin{equation}
300: E[x]=\int x\rho(x)dx=m.
301: \end{equation}
302:
303: \paragraph{Standard deviation of gene expression}
304: By using the formula $\rho^{cm}(x)=\frac{1}{c}\rho^m(x/c)$ in previous section, we obtain the variance $V[x]\equiv\sigma^2$ as follows:
305: \begin{equation}
306: V[x]=\int (x-m)^2 \rho^m(x)dx \propto m^2.
307: \end{equation}
308: Then, by using Eqs. (11) and (12), we find the observed scaling law in gene expression systems as:
309: \begin{equation}
310: \sigma\propto m^\alpha,
311: \end{equation}
312: with exponent $\alpha=1$.
313:
314:
315: \section{Conclusions}
316: In summary, we have analysed datasets of gene expression time series from yeast and human
317: organisms and we have found that the coupling between the average expression level and fluctuations follows
318: a scaling-law with exponent one $\alpha=1$. Therefore, as we have found the
319: same scaling-law for organisms as yeast and human, we believe that it
320: probably indicates that this is a universal feature of the gene expression dynamics
321: in all the living organisms.
322:
323: Furthermore, in order to explain this observation in gene expression fluctuations, we have proposed
324: a stochastic model, which is able to
325: reproduce the observed scaling-law and it also generates
326: the relevant scaling exponent. Precisely, we show that this
327: scaling law with mysterious exponent one emerges
328: from one generic mechanism: self-similarity symmetry \cite{ochi2}.
329:
330: Interestingly, the same scaling-law and the same exponent $\alpha=1$
331: were recently found in natural transport systems as rivers and highways \cite{m1}. Although in our model the scaling-law and
332: the exponent one is re-built from the self-similarity symmetry embedded in the gene expression fluctuations, we believe that
333: this self-similar property is not only a feature of gene expression systems and it could also be found in natural transport systems and
334: technical and artificial dynamical networks. Therefore, our stochastic approach and this symmetry could explain
335: the origin of scaling law of fluctuation dynamics in biological and nonbiological systems in a broader scope.
336:
337:
338: %It means
339: %that gene expression fluctuations
340: %are mainly driven by external
341: %forces (i.e., organizing themselves by following the demands of the organism), which are
342: %catalyzed by the gene regulatory and transcriptional control systems.
343:
344:
345: %Furthermore, in order to explain this observation in gene expression fluctuations, we have proposed
346: %a stochastic model, which is able to
347: %reproduce the observed scaling-law and it also generates
348: %the relevant scaling exponent. Precisely, we show that this
349: %scaling law with mysterious exponent one emerges
350: %from one generic mechanism: self-similarity symmetry \cite{ochi2}.
351:
352: Moreover, as
353: this model has been used successfully to uncover other scaling
354: properties of gene expression dynamics \cite{ochi,ochi2} and to analyze the gene correlation dynamics \cite{ochi3}, it indicates that
355: it contains valuable information about the gene expression dynamics
356: and it is a useful tool for studying it. Therefore, further advances
357: towards this direction, and in particular, about the study of
358: specific biological processes in gene regulatory architectures
359: by using these stochastic concepts and techniques are encouraged.
360:
361:
362:
363: \vspace{0.5cm}
364: \noindent
365:
366: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
367:
368:
369: \bibitem{doro} S.N. Dorogovtsev and J.F.F. Mendes, Evolution of Networks: From Biological Nets
370: to the Internet and WWW, (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003).
371:
372: \bibitem{bara} A.-L. Barab\'{a}si and Z.N. Oltvai, Network Biology: Understanding the Cells's
373: Functional Organization, Nature Review Genetics {\bf 5}, 101-113 (2004).
374:
375:
376: %3. Albert, R. & Barabasi, A.-L., Statistical mechanics in complex networks. Review of Modern Physics, 74, 47-102 (2002).
377:
378:
379: \bibitem{m1} M. Argollo de Menezes and A.-L. Barab\'{a}si, Fluctuations in Network Dynamics, Physics Review Letters, {\bf 92}, 028701 (2004).
380:
381: \bibitem{m2} M. Argollo de Menezes and A.-L. Barab\'{a}si, Separating Internal and External
382: Dynamics of Complex Systems, Physics Review Letters, {\bf 93}, 068701 (2004).
383:
384:
385:
386: %6. Almaas, E., Kovacs, B., Vicsek, T., Oltavai, Z.N., Barabasi, A.-L. Global organization of metabolic fluxes in bacterium Escherichia coli. Nature, 427, 839-843 (2004).
387: \bibitem{ueda} H. Ueda, et al., Universality and flexibility in gene expression from bacteria to human, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A, {\bf 101}, (11) 3765 (2004).
388: %7. Ueda, H.R., et al., Universality and flexibility in gene expression from bacteria to human, Proc. Natl. Amer. Soc., 101, (11) 3765 (2004).
389: \bibitem{ochi} T. Ochiai, J.C. Nacher and T. Akutsu, A constructive approach to gene expression dynamics, Physics Letters A, {\bf 330}, 313-321, (2004).
390: \bibitem{chip1} P.O. Brown, D. Botstein, Exploring the New World of the genome with DNA microarray, Nature Genetics, {\bf 21}, 33-37 (1999).
391: \bibitem{chip2} D.J. Lockhart, et al., Expression monitoring by hybridizidation to high-density oligonucleotide arrays, Nature Biotechnology,
392: {\bf 14} (13), 1675-80 (1996).
393: \bibitem{cho1} R.J. Cho, et al. A genome-wide transcriptional analysis of the mitotic cell cycle. Mol. Cell Biol. {\bf 2}, 65-73 (1998).
394: \bibitem{cho2} R.J. Cho, et al. Transcriptional regulation and function during the human
395: cell cycle. Nature Genetics, {\bf 27}, 48-54 (2001).
396: \bibitem{kampen} N.G. Van Kampen, Stochastic processes in Physics and Chemistry, Elsevier, Amsterdam (1992).
397: \bibitem{ochi2} T. Ochiai, J.C. Nacher, T. Akutsu, Symmetry and Dynamics in gene expression: Self-similarity symmetry governs the gene
398: expression dynamics. e-print archive
399: {\it http://arxiv.org/abs/q-bio.BM/0503003}. {\it Submitted} (2005).
400:
401:
402: \bibitem{kuz} V.A. Kuznetsov, G.D. Knott, R.F. Bonner, General statistics of stochastic process of gene expression in Eukaryotic cells. Genetics {\bf 161}, 1321 (2002).
403: \bibitem{elo} M.B. Elowitz, A.J. Levine, E.D. Siggia, P.E. Swain, Stochastic gene expression in a single cell. Science {\bf 297}, 1183 (2002).
404:
405: \bibitem{paulsson} J. Paulsson, Summing up the noise, Nature, {\bf 427}, 415 (2004).
406: \bibitem{sato} K. Sato, Y. Ito, T. Yomo, K. Kaneko, On the relation between fluctuation and response in biological systems, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A {\bf 100}, 14086 (2003).
407: \bibitem{blake} W.J. Blake, M. Kaern, C.R. Cantor, J.J. Collins, Noise in eukaryotic gene expression, Nature {\bf 422} 633 (2003).
408: \bibitem{hasty} J. Hasty, J. Pradines, M. Dolnik, J.J. Collins, Noise-based switches and amplifiers for gene expression, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A {\bf 97} (5) 1075 (2000).
409:
410:
411: \bibitem{wong} E. Wong, {\it Stochastic Processes in Information and Dynamical Systems}, Ed. New York, McGraw-Hill (1971).
412:
413: %\bibitem{Gard}C.W. Gardiner, {\it Handbook of Stochastic Methods for physics, chemistry and the natural sciences}, Springer Verlag (1990)
414:
415: \bibitem{black} T. Mikosch, {\it Elementary Stochastic Calculus with Finance in View}, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd (1998).
416:
417: \bibitem{ochi3} T. Ochiai, J.C. Nacher, T. Akutsu, A stochastic approach to multi-gene expression dynamics. e-print archive
418: {\it http://arxiv.org/abs/q-bio.BM/0502015}. Physics Letters A, {\it in press} (2005).
419:
420: \end{thebibliography}
421:
422: \newpage
423:
424:
425: %\vspace{0.5cm}
426: %\noindent
427:
428: %\begin{thebibliography}{99}
429:
430: %\bibitem{hart} L.H. Hartwell, J.J. Hopfield, S. Leibler and A.W. Murray, Nature {\bf 402}, C47 (1999).
431:
432: %\bibitem{david} D. J. Lockhard, E. A. Winzeler, Nature {\bf 405}, 827 (2000).
433:
434: %\bibitem{ochi} T. Ochiai, J.C. Nacher, T. Akutsu, Physics Letters A {\bf 330}, 313 (2004).
435:
436: %\bibitem{li} W. Li, Y. Yang, J. Theor. Biology {\bf 219}, 539 (2002).
437:
438: %\bibitem{brass} D.C. Hoyle, M. Rattray, R. Jupp, A. Brass, Bioinformatics
439: %{\bf 18}, 576 (2002).
440:
441: %\bibitem{kuznetsov} V.A. Kuznetsov, G.D. Knott, R.F. Bonner, Genetics {\bf 161}, 1321 (2002).
442:
443: %\bibitem{kaneko} C. Furusawa and K. Kaneko, Physical Review Letters {\bf 90}, 088102 (2003).
444:
445: %\bibitem{ueda} H. Ueda {\it et. al.}, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. {\bf 101}, 3765 (2004).
446:
447: %\bibitem{bara} A.-L. Barab\'{a}si, R. Albert, Science {\bf 286}, 509 (1999).
448:
449: %\bibitem{amaral} L.A.N. Amaral, A.Scala, M. Barthelemy, H.E. Stanley, Proc. Nat%l. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. {\bf 97}, 11149 (2000).
450:
451: %\bibitem{elo} M.B. Elowitz, A.J. Levine, E.D. Siggia, P.E. Swain, Science {\bf 297}, 1183 (2002).
452:
453: %\bibitem{human} R.J. Cho et al., Nature Genetics {\bf 27}, 48 (2001).
454:
455: %\bibitem{yeast} R.J. Cho et al., Mol. Cell. Biol. {\bf 2}, 65 (1998).
456:
457: %\bibitem{sato} K. Sato, Y. Ito, T. Yomo, K. Kaneko, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A {\bf 100}, 14086 (2003).
458:
459: %\bibitem{Kampen} N.G.van Kampen, {\it Stochastic processes in physics and chemistry,} Elsevier Science B.V. (1992).
460:
461: %\bibitem{Wong} E. Wong, {\it Stochastic Processes in Information and Dynamical Systems}, Ed. New York, McGraw-Hill (1971).
462:
463: %\bibitem{Gard}C.W. Gardiner, {\it Handbook of Stochastic Methods for physics, chemistry and the natural sciences}, Springer Verlag (1990)
464:
465: %\bibitem{black} T. Mikosch, {\it Elementary Stochastic Calculus with Finance in View}, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd (1998).
466:
467: %\bibitem{Tau}Tau-Mu Yi, Yau Huang, Melvin I.Simon, John Doyle, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A {\bf 97}, 4649 (2000).
468:
469: %\bibitem{kegg} M. Kanehisa, S. Goto, S. Kawashima, Y. Okuno, M. Hattori, Nucleic Acids Research, {\bf 32}, D277 (2004).
470:
471: %\bibitem{Chech} Y.R. Chechetkin, V.S. Lutovinov, A.Y. Turygin, J. Stat. Phys. {\bf 61}, 573 (1990).
472:
473: %\bibitem{jeong} H. Jeong, B. Tombor, R. Albert, Z.N. Oltvai, A.-L. Barab\'{a}si, Nature {\bf 407}, 651 (2000).
474:
475: %\bibitem{wagner} A. Wagner, D. A. Fell, Proc. R. Soc. London B {\bf 268}, 1803 (2001).
476:
477: %\bibitem{rasvaz} E. Ravasz, A.L. Somera, D.A. Mongru, Z.N. Oltvai, A.-L. Barab\'{a}si, Science {\bf 297}, 1551 (2002).
478:
479:
480:
481:
482: %\end{thebibliography}
483:
484: %\newpage
485:
486: %\begin{figure}[h]
487: %\centerline{\protect
488: %\hbox{
489: %\psfig{file=fig1.ps,height=3.0cm,width=3.5cm,angle=0}}}
490: %\caption{\small{(We show the experimental absolute value of gene expression level (vertical axis) vs. time (horizontal axis)
491: %of a selected group of genes which belong to human organism \cite{human}. We see that the gene expression
492: %value fluctuates around the mean value $m$=6000 and $m$=1000.
493: %}}
494: %\end{figure}
495:
496:
497: %\newpage
498:
499: \begin{figure}[htb]
500: \setlength{\unitlength}{1cm}
501: \begin{picture}(15,12)(-1,-1)
502: \put(-1,-1){\includegraphics[scale=0.65]{fig1.ps}}
503: \end{picture}
504: \caption{\small{We show the experimental absolute value of gene expression level (vertical axis) vs. time (horizontal axis)
505: of a selected group of genes which belong to human organism \cite{cho2}. We see that the gene expression
506: value fluctuates around the mean value $m$=6000 and $m$=1000. By observing this figure, we see that genes with high expression level
507: fluctuates more (i.e., jump size is large}, which in the end is the origin of the scaling-law $\sigma\propto m^\alpha$ with $\alpha=1$. In Fig. 2, we
508: show more clearly this phenomena by using the appropriate observables.}
509: \label{fig: construction}
510: \end{figure}
511:
512:
513:
514:
515: \begin{figure}[htb]
516: \setlength{\unitlength}{1cm}
517: \begin{picture}(15,12)(-1,-1)
518: \put(-2,0){\includegraphics[scale=0.6]{fig22.eps}}
519: \end{picture}
520: \caption{\small{
521: We show the experimental results of the coupling of the fluctuations $\sigma$
522: and the average of gene expression level $m$. Horizontal axis denotes
523: the average of gene expression level $m$ and vertical axis denotes the
524: fluctuations $\sigma$ for each gene expression data. Left) The analyzed data
525: corresponds to human organism. Right) The analyzed data corresponds to
526: yeast organism. Figures are in log-log scale. We see that both
527: organisms (human and yeast) obeys the same scaling-law $\sigma\propto m^\alpha$ with exponent $\alpha=1$. The
528: scaling-law indicates that genes with high expression level fluctuate more, and in addition,
529: the fluctuation size (i.e., jump size) depends linearly on the mean value of gene expression $m$. Therefore, this
530: scaling-law is a macroscopic and collective effect
531: of the fluctuations shown in Fig. 1. It is worth noticing that this scaling-law
532: was also found in non-biological systems as for example, rivers, highways and World Wide Web \cite{m1}, with the same exponent $\alpha=1$.
533: }}
534: \label{fig: construction}
535: \end{figure}
536:
537: %\newpage
538:
539: %\newpage
540:
541: %\begin{figure}[h]
542: %\centerline{\protect
543: %\hbox{
544: %\psfig{file=Fig2.eps,height=3.0cm,angle=-90}}}
545: %\caption{\small{(We show the simulated results of our model for different values of $\rho$. Values of $\rho$ are indicated
546: %in each figure, from $A$ to $E$. (A) $\rho=1.0$ indicates that both genes are totally positively correlated. (B) $\rho=0.5$ indicates that both genes are slightly positively correlated. (C) $\rho$=0 indicates
547: %uncorrelation between genes. (D) $\rho=-0.5$ indicates that both genes are slightly negatively correlated. (E) $\rho=-1.0$
548: %indicates that both genes are completely negatively correlated.
549: %}}
550: %\end{figure}
551:
552:
553: %\begin{figure}[htb]
554: %\setlength{\unitlength}{1cm}
555: %\begin{picture}(15,12)(-1,-1)
556: %\scalebox{0.5}[0.5]
557: %\put(-2,0){\includegraphics[scale=0.7]{Fig2.eps}}
558: %\end{picture}
559: %\caption{\small{We show the simulated results of our model for different values% of $\rho$. Values of $\rho$ are indicated
560: %in each figure, from $A$ to $E$. (A) $\rho=1.0$ indicates that both genes are t%otally positively correlated. (B) $\rho=0.5$ indicates that both genes are slig%htly positively correlated. (C) $\rho$=0 indicates
561: %uncorrelation between genes. (D) $\rho=-0.5$ indicates that both genes are slig%htly negatively correlated. (E) $\rho=-1.0$
562: %indicates that both genes are completely negatively correlated.}}
563: %\end{figure}
564:
565:
566: %\newpage@@
567:
568:
569: %\begin{figure}[htb]
570: %\setlength{\unitlength}{1cm}
571: %\begin{picture}(15,10)(-1,-1)
572: %\put(-4,0){\includegraphics{fig3.ps}}
573: %\end{picture}
574: %\caption{\small{Gene distribution $p(k)$ in vertical axis in terms of gene expression level $k$ in horizontal axis. Scale is log-log. We
575: %plot the stationary state corresponding to the Log-Normal distribution. As we see the distribution is almost scale-free, with small
576: %curvature correction. }}
577: %\label{fig:power law}
578: %\end{figure}
579:
580: %\newpage
581:
582:
583: %\begin{figure}[htb]
584: %\setlength{\unitlength}{1cm}
585: %\begin{picture}(15,15)(-1,-1)
586: %\put(-5,0){\includegraphics{fig4.ps}}
587: %\end{picture}
588: %\caption{\small{We show the dynamics of gene expression $p(k,t,k_0,t_0)$
589: %(vertical axis). $y$ (resp. $x$) axis represents $k_1$ (resp. $k_2$) expression level. At the top, from left to right, three different
590: %states: initial state ($t=0$), intermediate state (intermediate $t$), and final state ($t \to \infty$). At the bottom, the
591: %same representation by using 3D view. Colors represent gradual changes of
592: %values of transition probability: white (maximum), red (medium), light blue (minimum).}}
593: %\label{fig:dynamics}
594: %\end{figure}
595:
596:
597: \end{document}
598:
599: