1: \documentclass[twocolumn]{article}
2: \usepackage{graphicx,color}
3: \textwidth=44pc
4: \textheight=9.7in
5: \hoffset=-0.7in
6: \voffset=-0.7in
7: \usepackage{epsfig}
8:
9: \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{$\dag$}
10: \renewcommand{\theequation}{1\alph{equation}}
11:
12: \begin{document}
13: \bibliographystyle{pnas1}
14:
15: \title{\textbf{\LARGE Spiky oscillations in NF-$\kappa$B signalling}}
16: \author
17: {Sandeep Krishna,$^{*}$ Mogens H. Jensen, Kim Sneppen\\
18: \\
19: \normalsize{Niels Bohr Institute, Blegdamsvej 17, 2100 Copenhagen \O, Denmark.}\\
20: \\
21: \normalsize{$^*$To whom correspondence should be addressed; E-mail: sandeep@nbi.dk.}
22: }
23: \date{}
24:
25: \maketitle
26:
27: {\bf
28: The NF-$\kappa$B signalling system is involved in a variety of cellular
29: processes including immune response,
30: inflammation, and apoptosis.
31: Recent experiments
32: have found oscillations in the nuclear-cytoplasmic translocation
33: of the NF-$\kappa$B transcription factor
34: [Hoffmann {\it et al.} (2002) {\it Science} {\bf 298}, 1241;
35: Nelson {\it et al.} (2004) {\it Science} {\bf 306}, 704.]
36: How the cell uses the oscillations to differentiate input conditions
37: and send specific signals to downstream genes is an open problem.
38: We shed light on this issue by examining the
39: small core network driving the oscillations, which, we show,
40: is designed to produce periodic spikes in nuclear NF-$\kappa$B
41: concentration. The oscillations can be used to regulate downstream genes in
42: a variety of ways. In particular, we show that
43: genes to whose operator sites NF-$\kappa$B binds and dissociates fast
44: can respond very sensitively to changes in the input signal, with
45: effective Hill coefficients in excess of 20.}
46:
47: NF-$\kappa$B is a family of dimeric transcription factors which participate in the
48: regulation of a number of cellular
49: processes including immune response, inflammation and apoptosis
50: \cite{LDHSG,LBLNK,GhoshKarin,GMK}.
51: Extensive experiments using electrophoretic mobility shift assay
52: and single-cell flourescence imaging
53: have found oscillations in the nuclear-cytoplasmic translocation
54: of the NF-$\kappa$B transcription factor in mammalian cells \cite{HLSB,Nelsonetal},
55: with a time period of the order of hours.
56: NF-$\kappa$B can be activated by a number of external stimuli \cite{Pahl}
57: including bacteria, viruses and various stresses and proteins (e.g., tumor necrosis factor-$\alpha$, TNF-$\alpha$,
58: which was the signal used in refs.
59: \cite{HLSB,Nelsonetal}).
60: In response to these signals it targets over 150 genes
61: including many chemokines, immunoreceptors, stress reponse genes, as
62: well as acute phase inflammation
63: response proteins \cite{Pahl}.
64: Experiments show that NF-$\kappa$B does not regulate all
65: its downstream genes in the same way. For example, the
66: chemokine gene RANTES turns on much later than
67: another chemokine IP-10 after TNF-$\alpha$ activation \cite{HLSB}.
68: Thus, the two main questions raised by the dynamics of the NF-$\kappa$B
69: system are: how does the network of interactions produce
70: oscillations, and how does the cell use
71: the oscillations to differentiate input conditions
72: and send specific signals to downstream genes?
73: In this paper, we elucidate
74: the small core network driving the oscillations and show that it
75: is designed to produce periodic spikes in nuclear NF-$\kappa$B
76: concentration. We show that the spiky oscillations are extremely robust
77: to variation of parameters. We further argue that the spikiness
78: is associated with an increased sensitivity
79: of the system that could be used
80: for differentially regulating downstream genes.
81:
82: \section*
83: {Extracting the Core Feedback Loop}
84: Hoffman {\it et al.} have constructed
85: a long list of chemical reactions
86: between 26 different molecules in the NF-$\kappa$B system,
87: including reaction constants \cite{HLSB}.
88: We reduced this system
89: to the core feedback loop (Fig. \ref{schematic}B) generating oscillations.
90: The reduction
91: was done in three steps: the first, removing molecules which
92: have no feedback from NF-$\kappa$B and
93: deleting slow reactions where faster alternate pathways exist
94: (e.g., export of nuclear NF-$\kappa$B)
95: resulted in a 7-variable model.
96:
97: The interactions in
98: this model are schematically displayed in Fig. \ref{schematic}A.
99: It consists of cytoplasmic and nuclear NF-$\kappa$B,
100: its inhibitor,
101: I$\kappa$B, and I$\kappa$B kinase (IKK) which phosphorylates the inhibitor,
102: leading to its degradation.
103: The inhibitor forms a complex with NF-$\kappa$B which, in the cytoplasm,
104: prevents its transport into the nucleus. Only free nuclear NF-$\kappa$B is imported
105: into the nucleus. In contrast, from inside the nucleus,
106: only the complex can be exported, not the free NF-$\kappa$B.
107: I$\kappa$B is known to occur in several isoforms.
108: Cells containing only the I$\kappa$B$\alpha$ isoform show sustained
109: oscillations, while cells with only the I$\kappa$B$\beta$ or $\epsilon$
110: isoforms do not show oscillations. Wild type cells, with all three isoforms,
111: typically exhibit damped oscillations \cite{HLSB}.
112: The difference between these isoforms is that only I$\kappa$B$\alpha$
113: is activated by NF-$\kappa$B \cite{SGBG,SFLNB}. In contrast
114: I$\kappa$B$\beta,\epsilon$ are produced at a rate
115: independent of NF-$\kappa$B and so lie outside the feedback loop
116: (see supporting text for the equations
117: governing the dynamics of the 7-variable model.)
118:
119: Coarse graining over fast chemical reactions involving
120: complex formation reduced this system
121: to 4 variables.
122: Finally, based on numerical observations, we found we could
123: effectively eliminate
124: nuclear I$\kappa$B, giving the model in Fig. \ref{schematic}B.
125: More details of the reduction process are given
126: in supporting text.
127:
128: \begin{figure}[t]
129: {\bf A}\\
130: \centerline{\epsfig{height=5cm,file=nfkbschematic1_reduced.eps}}
131: {\bf B}\\
132: \centerline{\epsfig{height=5cm,file=nfkbschematic4_reduced2.eps}}
133: \caption{
134: \label{schematic}
135: Schematic diagram of interactions in the NF-$\kappa$B signalling system.
136: {\bf A}. 7-variable model.
137: {\bf B}. 3-variable model.
138: }
139: \end{figure}
140:
141: \section*{Results}
142: \subsection*{3-Variable Model of NF-$\kappa$B Oscillations}
143: The core feedback loop,
144: we find,
145: consists
146: of only three constituents (Fig. 1B):
147: nuclear NF-$\kappa$B ($N_n$), cytoplasmic I$\kappa$B ($I$)
148: and I$\kappa$B mRNA ($I_m$).
149: NF-$\kappa$B dimers activate production of
150: I$\kappa$B mRNA
151: which translated to I$\kappa$B
152: inhibits nuclear
153: NF-$\kappa$B production, completing the feedback loop.
154:
155: The dynamics of the system in Fig. \ref{schematic}B is captured by
156: three coupled ordinary differential equations:
157: \begin{eqnarray}
158: \frac{dN_n}{dt}&=&A\frac{(1-N_n)}{\epsilon+I}-B\frac{IN_n}{\delta+N_n},\\
159: \frac{dI_m}{dt}&=&N_n^2-I_m,\\
160: \frac{dI~~}{dt}&=&I_m-C\frac{(1-N_n)I}{\epsilon+I}.
161: \end{eqnarray}
162: For ease of analysis we have rescaled all variables
163: to be dimensionless (the original equations
164: and the rescaling process are described in supporting text.)
165: $A, B, C, \delta, \epsilon$ are dimensionless parameters dependent on the reaction constants
166: (see supporting text).
167: The external signal is supplied by IKK that enters the equations
168: through the parameter, $C$, which is proportional to IKK concentration.
169: The model has no spatial degrees of freedom. It has been suggested that
170: flow induced stresses can trigger NF-$\kappa$B mediated gene activity \cite{Gangulietal}
171: but here we assume that each compartment, the cytoplasm and nucleus, is
172: well-mixed.
173:
174: The first term in equation (1a) represents the import of free cytoplasmic
175: NF-$\kappa$B (whose concentration is $1-N_n$) into the nucleus. This is
176: hindered by the presence of cytoplasmic I$\kappa$B which sequesters
177: NF-$\kappa$B in the cytoplasm. Parameter $A$ is proportional to the
178: NF-$\kappa$B nuclear import rate. The second term in (1a) derives from the export of
179: NF-$\kappa$B from the nucleus via the NF-$\kappa$B--I$\kappa$B complex,
180: which is why the term also depends on $I$. $B$ is proportional to
181: I$\kappa$B nuclear import rate. $\delta$ sets the concentration at which
182: half the nuclear I$\kappa$B is complexed to NF-$\kappa$B and it depends
183: both on the rates of association and dissociation of the complex as well
184: as the export rate.
185:
186: The first term in equation (1b), the rate of production of I$\kappa$B mRNA,
187: contains the square of $N_n$ because the production is activated by
188: NF-$\kappa$B dimers\footnote{Ref. \cite{Nelsonresponse} argues that making
189: this term linear in $N_n$ is better.
190: We have checked that this change does not alter our
191: conclusions (see supporting text.)}.
192: The second term is the degradation of the mRNA whose rate,
193: in these rescaled equations, sets the overall timescale.
194: It is easy to modify this equation to deal with the $\beta$ and $\epsilon$
195: isoforms of I$\kappa$B simply by adding a constant for their NF-$\kappa$B-independent
196: rate of production.
197:
198: Equation (1c) has one term for the production of cytoplasmic I$\kappa$B from
199: its mRNA and a second for its degradation due to the presence of IKK.
200: This degradation is proportional to the concentration of the NF-$\kappa$B--I$\kappa$B
201: complex, which depends on both $I$ and $(1-N_n)$, the concentration of
202: cytoplasmic NF-$\kappa$B. $\epsilon$ sets the concentration at which half of
203: the cytoplasmic NF-$\kappa$B is in the complex. $C$ is proportional to the rate of degradation
204: and to the IKK concentration.
205:
206: \begin{figure}[t]
207: \centerline{\epsfig{height=5cm,file=nfkb_ikb_3varosc_smallfont.ps}}
208: \caption{
209: \label{osc}
210: Sustained oscillations of nuclear NF-$\kappa$B ($N_n$), red, and
211: cytoplasmic I$\kappa$B, green, for $A=0.007$, $B=954.5$, $C=0.035$, $\delta=0.029$
212: and $\epsilon=2\times 10^{-5}$ (using parameter values
213: taken from \cite{HLSB}, see supporting text). The shape, phase and period are remarkably similar
214: to the experimental plot in Fig. 3B, left panel, in ref. \cite{Nelsonetal}.
215: }
216: \end{figure}
217:
218: Fig. \ref{osc} shows a plot of nuclear NF-$\kappa$B and
219: cytoplasmic I$\kappa$B concentrations obtained in simulations, using parameter
220: values from ref. \cite{HLSB}.
221: Our model predicts the following experimentally observed facts \cite{HLSB,Nelsonetal}:
222: i) sustained oscillations in cells with only the $\alpha$ isoform of I$\kappa$B,
223: ii) damped oscillations in wild type cells which include other isoforms of I$\kappa$B,
224: iii) time period of the order of hours,
225: iv) spikiness of nuclear NF-$\kappa$B
226: and asymmetry of
227: cytoplasmic I$\kappa$B oscillations,
228: v) phase difference between NF-$\kappa$B and I$\kappa$B,
229: vi) lower frequency upon increased transcription of I$\kappa$B.\\
230:
231: \subsection*{Saturated Degradation of I$\kappa$B is Crucial for Oscillations}
232: A key element in our 3-variable model
233: is the saturated degradation of cytoplasmic I$\kappa$B
234: in the presence of IKK (second term in eq. 1c)
235: due to the
236: Michaelis-Menten complex formation between NF-$\kappa$B and I$\kappa$B --
237: a complex needed for IKK triggered degradation of I$\kappa$B.
238: The same complex inhibits nuclear
239: NF-$\kappa$B production because only free cytoplasmic NF-$\kappa$B is
240: imported into the nucleus.
241:
242: A stability analysis of the system shows
243: the importance of the saturated degradation
244: for oscillations. In general, the system has a single fixed point where
245: all concentrations are unchanging in time.
246: For small values of $\epsilon$, corresponding to strong
247: saturation of the degradation, this fixed point is unstable and the system
248: goes into a periodic cycle. As $\epsilon$ is increased
249: the fixed point becomes stable and the oscillations disappear (Fig. \ref{epsstability}).
250: This happens when the value of $\epsilon$ becomes comparable to the steady state
251: value of $I$, which is precisely when the degradation rate stops being saturated.
252: The saturation is crucial for oscillations because it puts an upper limit
253: to the degradation rate, allowing I$\kappa$B to accumulate and stay around longer
254: than with the more usual $I$-proportional degradation rate.
255: This effectively introduces a time delay into the feedback loop.
256: Negative feedback with time delay is known to easily produce oscillations,
257: and this mechanism has been used to model the p53 \cite{TSJ} and
258: Hes oscillations \cite{JST}.
259: Here, instead of being put in by hand, the time delay arises more naturally
260: through the dynamics of the system.
261:
262: \begin{figure}[ht]
263: \centerline{\epsfig{height=5cm,file=epsstability.eps}}
264: \caption{
265: \label{epsstability}
266: Importance of saturated degradation of $I$.
267: {\bf A.} Steady state solution of equation (1) for $I$ as a function of the parameter $\epsilon$.
268: Dashed line shows the region where the fixed point is unstable and the solid line
269: shows the region where it is stable
270: (see supporting text).
271: Black dots mark the parameter values used in (B) and (C).
272: The crossover from unstable to stable occurs where $\epsilon$ becomes comparable to the steady
273: state value of $I$, i.e., where the degradation of $I$ stops being saturated.
274: {\bf B.} Trajectory of the system in the $I$-$N_n$ phase plane, for $\epsilon=5\times 10^{-4}$, which converges to
275: a stable limit cycle. {\bf C.} Trajectory of the system, for $\epsilon=1.5\times 10^{-3}$, which converges
276: to a stable fixed point.
277: }
278: \end{figure}
279:
280: Interestingly, the NF-$\kappa$B core in Fig. \ref{schematic}B is similar
281: to an early model
282: showing oscillations by negative feedback \cite{BPM} which
283: introduced precisely the same kind of saturated degradation to
284: mitigate the unreasonably large Hill coefficient in
285: an even earlier model of Goodwin \cite{Goodwin}.
286: The importance of this mechanism has also been recognized by Goldbeter who has
287: used it in models of various cellular oscillations,
288: e.g., the cell cycle \cite{Goldbeter_cellcycle},
289: development in myxobacteria \cite{Goldbeter_development}, yeast stress response \cite{Goldbeter_yeaststress}
290: and the mammalian circadian clock \cite{Goldbeter_circadian}.
291: Saturated degradation has also been implicated in models of calcium oscillations
292: in cells \cite{RBSSZE,Goldbeter_calcium}. We further note the p53 system, which also
293: shows oscillations, contains the degradation of p53 via the formation of a complex
294: with Mdm2 \cite{VLL}, which could result in saturated degradation.
295: This suggests that saturated degradation might be a very
296: general mechanism, easily implemented by complex formation and used by
297: cellular processes to introduce time delays where necessary.
298:
299: \subsection*{Spiky Oscillations and Control of Downstream Genes}
300: {\bf Robust spiky oscillations.}
301: One feature of our model
302: is that it can produce sharp spikes in nuclear NF-$\kappa$B.
303: This is unusual for oscillations driven by negative feedback \cite{Goldbeter_review}.
304: We quantify spikiness using the following measure:
305: $Z=({\rm max}(N_n)-{\rm min}(N_n))/{\rm mean}(N_n)$.
306: Oscillations with $Z>2$ we term spiky, and oscillations with
307: $Z<2$, soft.
308: Fig. \ref{spikyandsoft} shows an example of each type of oscillation, generated
309: from the 3-variable model using different parameter values.\\
310:
311: \begin{figure}[hb]
312: \centerline{\epsfig{height=5cm,file=spikyandsoft.eps}}
313: \caption{
314: \label{spikyandsoft}
315: Spiky and soft oscillations.
316: Plots of nuclear NF-$\kappa$B concentration as a function of time
317: from equation (1) with $A$,$B$,$C$ and $\delta$ the same as in Fig. \ref{osc}.
318: {\bf A.} Spiky oscillations with $\epsilon=2\times 10^{-5}$, the same as in Fig. \ref{osc}.
319: {\bf B.} Soft oscillations with $\epsilon=5\times 10^{-4}$.
320: }
321: \end{figure}
322:
323: \begin{figure}[p]
324: {\bf A}\\
325: \centerline{\epsfig{height=7cm,file=balloon_new_bitmap.ps}}
326: {\bf B}\\
327: \centerline{\epsfig{height=7cm,file=balloon_abc_bitmap.ps}}
328: \caption{
329: \label{robustness}
330: Robustness of spiky oscillations.
331: The 3d volume is the region of spiky oscillations ($Z>2$, defined in main text); colour gradient towards red shows increasing values
332: of $Z$.
333: {\bf A.} The robustness for parameters $A, B, \delta$. The 2d plot shows the horizontal slice (white line)
334: through the 3d volume at $\delta=0.029$, the value used in Fig. \ref{osc}.
335: The black dot corresponds to values of $A,B$ used in Fig. \ref{osc}.
336: {\bf B.} A similar plot for parameters $A, B, C$.}
337: \end{figure}
338:
339: The spikiness is extremely robust to variation
340: of parameters as shown in Fig. \ref{robustness}.
341: Note the scales are logarithmic: parameters can be varied
342: by several decades without going out of the oscillatory regime.
343: The enormous robustness suggests that the spikiness of the oscillations is
344: an important element in the design of NF-$\kappa$B signalling
345: and may be essential for its proper functioning as a transcription factor.
346: We substantiate this idea in the subsequent sections.\\
347:
348: \noindent
349: {\bf Sensitivity to IKK is high for spiky oscillations.}
350: Since IKK is the external signal to which the system responds,
351: we begin by comparing the sensitivity of spiky and soft oscillations
352: to changes in IKK concentration.
353: We consider two quantities: the spike duration, defined as the amount of time
354: $N_n$ spends above its average value, and the spike peak, defined as the
355: maximum nuclear NF-$\kappa$B concentration during each cycle of oscillations.
356: Fig. \ref{IKKsensitivity}A shows how the spike duration depends on IKK concentration.
357: The sensitivity of the spike duration is very high in certain regions of
358: spiky oscillations.
359: It is especially large near the transition to soft oscillations.
360: A similar sensitivity is seen in the peak NF-$\kappa$B concentration (Fig. \ref{IKKsensitivity}B).
361: Thus, the spike duration and peak
362: are much more sensitive to (and therefore easier to regulate by)
363: IKK for spiky
364: than for soft oscillations.\\
365:
366: \begin{figure}[ht]
367: {\bf A\hfill B\hfill ~}\\
368: \epsfig{height=3.5cm,file=ikkresponse.ps}
369: \epsfig{height=3.5cm,file=peakikkresponse.ps}
370: \caption{\label{IKKsensitivity}
371: Sensitivity to IKK.
372: {\bf A.} Spike duration, the fraction of time $N_n$ spends above its mean value, as a function of IKK concentration. The black dot shows the IKK value
373: used in Fig. \ref{osc}. Blue and red signify, respectively, regions of spiky
374: and soft oscillations. Notice the sharp response just before the transition to soft oscillations.
375: {\bf B.} Spike peak, the maximum concentration of nuclear NF-$\kappa$B, as a function of IKK concentration. The black dot shows the IKK value
376: used in Fig. \ref{osc}. Blue and red signify, respectively, regions of spiky
377: and soft oscillations. Notice the sharp response just before the transition to soft oscillations.
378: }
379: \end{figure}
380:
381: {\bf Large Hill coefficients and regulation of downstream genes.}
382: It is possible for genes regulated by NF-$\kappa$B to
383: inherit this sensitivity in the form of a high effective Hill
384: coefficient.
385: Consider a gene which has an operator site at which NF-$\kappa$B dimers
386: can bind and activate the gene:
387: $$ G + 2N \mathop{\rightleftharpoons}_{k_{off}}^{k_{on}} G^*.$$
388: To begin with, we assume that the binding of NF-$\kappa$B to the operator
389: is in equilibrium, i.e., $k_{on}$ and $k_{off}$ are much larger than
390: the rates of all other processes in the NF-$\kappa$B system. In that case
391: the gene activity, $G^*$, will follow the NF-$\kappa$B concentration:
392: $$G^*=\frac{N_n^2}{k_{off}/k_{on}+N_n^2}.$$
393: Fig. \ref{eqlgene} shows the peak gene activity as a function of IKK
394: concentration. The effective Hill coefficient of this response curve is
395: over 20, much larger than the values obtained by typical ways of introducing
396: cooperativity in gene regulation \cite{HF,GK}.
397: As the inset shows, the effective Hill coefficient
398: remains above 20 for a large range of values of the ratio $k_{off}/k_{on}$, i.e.,
399: genes controlled in this way show a very high sensitivity to the input signal.
400:
401: \begin{figure}[t]
402: \epsfig{height=5cm,file=peakgA_vs_IKK.eps}
403: \caption{\label{eqlgene}
404: Equilibrium binding of NF-$\kappa$B to a downstream gene.
405: The plot shows the peak gene activity as a function of IKK concentration (open circles).
406: The data has been fitted by a sigmoidal function of the form $1/(1+(x/x_0)^h)$. The least squares fit (solid line)
407: gives an effective Hill coefficient $h=23.4$.
408: Inset: effective Hill coefficient obtained by similar fitting for different $k_{off}/k_{on}$ ratios.
409: }
410: \end{figure}
411:
412: When $k_{on}$ and $k_{off}$ become
413: comparable to other rates in the system the binding of NF-$\kappa$B
414: to the operator remains out of equilibrium.
415: When $k_{off}$ is small enough, the gene activity does not have enough time
416: to decay completely between spikes of NF-$\kappa$B. Fig. \ref{koffsmall} shows
417: the peak activity as a function of IKK. In contrast to the equilibrium
418: case, here the response is linear at best. Note also that the peak gene activity
419: increases with IKK in contrast to the equilibirum case where it decreases.
420: Thus, the same oscillations
421: are capable of regulating genes very differently, depending on their
422: $k_{on,off}$ values which are determined
423: by their operator sites.
424:
425: \begin{figure}[ht]
426: \centerline{\epsfig{height=5cm,file=koffsmall.eps}}
427: \caption{\label{koffsmall}
428: Nonequilibrium binding of NF-$\kappa$B to a downstream gene.
429: The plot shows the peak gene activity as a function of IKK concentration,
430: with $k_{off}=0.001 min^{-1}$ kept fixed while $k_{on}=0.01 \mu M^{-1} min^{-1}$ for filled circles and
431: $0.001 \mu M^{-1} min^{-1}$ for open circles.
432: }
433: \end{figure}
434:
435: In the extreme case where
436: $k_{off}$ is negligible, each spike of nuclear NF-$\kappa$B
437: contributes to increase the
438: gene activity until it saturates to unity as shown by the
439: solid line in Fig. \ref{koffzero}.
440: If this gene controls the activity of a second one in a cascade:
441: $$G^*\mathop{\longrightarrow}^{k_t}G^* + P,$$
442: $$P\mathop{\longrightarrow}^{\gamma_p} \phi,$$
443: $$G_2 + P \mathop{\rightleftharpoons}^{k_{on}}_{k_{off}} G_2^*,$$
444: then the latter will turn on later (dashed line in Fig. \ref{koffzero})
445: with a time delay that depends on the
446: timescales of transcription, translation and promoter activation.
447: This is reminiscent of the experiments of ref. \cite{HLSB} which show the
448: gene IP-10 turning on quickly after the introduction of IKK, while the
449: gene RANTES turns on after a delay.
450:
451: \begin{figure}[t]
452: \centerline{\epsfig{height=5cm,file=koffzero.eps}}
453: \caption{\label{koffzero}
454: Strongly nonequilibrium binding of NF-$\kappa$B to a downstream gene.
455: The plot shows nuclear NF-$\kappa$B concentration (dotted line), the
456: activity of a gene, $G^*$ (solid line), directly activated by NF-$\kappa$B dimers
457: with $k_{on}=0.1 \mu M^{-2} min^{-1}$, $k_{off}=0$, and the activity of a second
458: gene, $G_2^*$ (dashed line), that is
459: activated by the protein product of $G$ ($k_t=0.01 min^{-1} $,
460: $\gamma_p=1 min^{-1}$, see main text).
461: }
462: \end{figure}
463:
464: \section*{Discussion}
465: What functional role, if any, do the oscillations in the NF-$\kappa$B system
466: play? There have been several suggestions: downstream gene networks are perhaps
467: regulated by the frequency of the oscillations, or the oscillations could be a by-product
468: of rapid attenuation of NF-$\kappa$B,
469: or they might be used to make multiple evaluations of the
470: input signal \cite{Lahav,TE}.
471: Barken {\it et al.}
472: \cite{BWKCHL}
473: warn against overemphasising the physiological role of oscillations.
474: Our approach to tackling this question has been to construct a
475: reduced 3-variable model
476: which, despite its simplicity, captures many characteristic features
477: of the system.
478: The simplicity of the model allows us to fully explore and understand
479: the range of dynamical behaviour it exhibits. In particular, we have
480: shown that it is capable of both spiky and soft oscillations, and
481: that the spiky oscillations are extremely robust to variation of
482: parameters.
483:
484: The activity of genes downstream of NF-$\kappa$B depends upon
485: the amount of time for which NF-$\kappa$B is present inside
486: the nucleus in sufficiently large concentrations to dimerize and
487: bind to those genes' operator sites.
488: It seems reasonable to assume that NF-$\kappa$B could
489: signal different downstream genes, simply by regulating the
490: amount and exposure time to IKK, provided the signalling system
491: is sufficiently sensitive to changes in IKK concentration.
492: We have shown that the spiky oscillations
493: can, indeed, show a high sensitivity to IKK.
494: This sensitivity
495: allows a great versatility in the regulation of downstream genes
496: by NF-$\kappa$B. Where the cell requires a gene to be very sensitive
497: to the IKK concentration, the NF-$\kappa$B system can result in steep response
498: curves with Hill coefficients larger than 20. And where a slower response
499: is necessary, it can be achieved by adjusting the
500: binding and dissociation constants of NF-$\kappa$B to that operator site.
501: Further, we found that
502: cascades of different length could be used to turn certain
503: genes on earlier or later. Given this versatility in regulatory strategies
504: it seems likely that
505: cells would have evolved to make use of these properties of the
506: NF-$\kappa$B oscillations.
507: It remains for future experiments to uncover the particular ways
508: NF-$\kappa$B regulates specific genes.\\
509:
510: \noindent
511: We thank J. Ferkinghoff-Borg, E. Siggia and G. Tiana for useful discussions.
512: This work was supported by the Danish Research Foundation.
513:
514: \bibliography{nfkbosc}
515:
516: \clearpage
517: \onecolumn
518: \section*{Supporting Text}
519: \subsection*{7-variable model of NF-$\kappa$B signalling}
520: We use the following abbreviations:
521: $N_n \& N$, free nuclear and cytoplasmic
522: NF-$\kappa$B;
523: $I_m$, I$\kappa$B mRNA; $I_n \& I$, free nuclear and cytoplasmic I$\kappa$B;
524: $(NI)_n \& (NI)$, nuclear and cytoplasmic NF-$\kappa$B--I$\kappa$B complex;
525: IKK, I$\kappa$B kinase.
526: The 7-variable model is defined by the equations:
527: $$\frac{dN_n}{dt}=k_{Nin}N-k_{fn}N_nI_n+k_{bn}(NI)_n,$$
528: $$\frac{dI_m}{dt}=k_tN_n^2-\gamma_mI_m,$$
529: $$\frac{dI}{dt}=k_{tl}I_m-k_fNI+k_b(NI)-k_{Iin}I+k_{Iout}I_n,$$
530: $$\frac{dN}{dt}=-k_fNI+(k_b+\alpha)(NI)-k_{Nin}N,$$
531: $$\frac{d(NI)}{dt}=k_fNI-(k_b+\alpha)(NI)+k_{NIout}(NI)_n,$$
532: $$\frac{dI_n}{dt}=k_{Iin}I-k_{Iout}I_n-k_{fn}N_nI_n+k_{bn}(NI)_n,$$
533: $$\frac{d(NI)_n}{dt}=k_{fn}N_nI_n-(k_{bn}+k_{NIout})(NI)_n.$$
534:
535: Figure \ref{suppreducfig} shows a plot of nuclear NF-$\kappa$B concentration
536: obtained by integrating these equations using the following
537: parameter values (Hoffmann et al. (2002) {\it Science} {\bf 298}, 1241):
538: $k_{Nin}=5.4~{\rm min}^{-1},k_{Iin}=0.018~{\rm min}^{-1},k_{Iout}=0.012~{\rm min}^{-1},k_{NIout}=0.83~{\rm min}^{-1},k_t=1.03~\mu M^{-1}{\rm min}^{-1},k_{tl}=0.24~{\rm min}^{-1},
539: k_f=k_{fn}=30~\mu M^{-1}{\rm min}^{-1},k_b=k_{bn}=0.03~{\rm min}^{-1},\alpha=1.05\times{\rm IKK}~{\rm min}^{-1},\gamma_m=0.017 {\rm min}^{-1}$.
540: The initial conditions were $N=1 \mu M$, ${\rm IKK}=0.5 \mu M$ and all other concentrations zero.
541:
542: \subsection*{Reduction from 7-variables to 3-variables}
543: First, taking note of the fact that $k_f$ and $k_{fn}$ are large, we assume that
544: all complexes are in equilibrium, i.e.:
545: $$k_fNI\approx(k_b+\alpha)(NI),$$
546: $$k_{fn}N_nI_n\approx(k_{bn}+k_{NIout})(NI)_n.$$
547: Simulations show that these are good approximations.
548: In terms of $I_n^{tot}\equiv I_n+(NI)_n$ and $N_c^{tot}\equiv N+(NI)=N_{tot}-N_n$, which are slowly varying,
549: we can rewrite the above equations as follows:
550: $$(NI)=(N_{tot}-N_n)\frac{I}{K_I+I},$$
551: $$N=(N_{tot}-N_n)\frac{K_I}{K_I+I},$$
552: $$(NI)_n=I_n^{tot}\frac{N_n}{K_N+N_n},$$
553: $$I_n=I_n^{tot}\frac{K_N}{K_N+N_n},$$
554: where $K_I\equiv(k_b+\alpha)/k_f=0.035 \mu M$ and $K_N\equiv(k_{bn}+k_{NIout})/k_{fn}=0.029 \mu M$, using the parameter values above.
555:
556: Using these expressions, the equations of the 7-variable model reduce to the following four (Fig. \ref{suppreducfig}):
557: $$\frac{dN_n}{dt}=k_{Nin}K_I\frac{(N_{tot}-N_n)}{K_I+I}-k_{NIout}\frac{I_n^{tot} N_n}{K_N+N_n},$$
558: $$\frac{dI_m}{dt}=k_tN_n^2-\gamma_mI_m,$$
559: $$\frac{dI}{dt}=k_{tl}I_m-\alpha \frac{(N_{tot}-N_n)I}{K_I+I}-k_{Iin}I+k_{Iout}K_N\frac{I_n^{tot}}{K_N+N_n},$$
560: $$\frac{dI_n^{tot}}{dt}=k_{Iin}I-k_{Iout}K_N\frac{I_n^{tot}}{K_N+N_n}-k_{NIout}\frac{I_n^{tot}N_n}{K_N+N_n}.$$
561:
562: First, we note that the terms $-k_{Iin}I$ and $k_{Iout}K_N\frac{I_n^{tot}}{K_N+N_n}$
563: in the $dI/dt$ equation
564: are much smaller than $-\alpha \frac{(N_{tot}-N_n)I}{K_I+I}$ and can be neglected
565: as long as IKK is non-zero. Secondly, simulations reveal that the term
566: $k_{NIout}\frac{I_n^{tot} N_n}{K_N+N_n}$, in the $dI_n^{tot}/dt$ equation, also shows sharp spikes as a function of time
567: which coincide with the spikes of $N_n$. The value of this term is substantial
568: only when $N_n\gg K_N$, i.e., during the spikes of $N_n$, and at those times $I_n^{tot}$ dips to its minimum.
569: We therefore make the approximation that $I_n^{tot}$ can be
570: replaced by its minimum value, $I_{n,min}^{tot}$, which satisfies the equation:
571: $$k_{Iin}I=k_{Iout}K_N\frac{I_{n,min}^{tot}}{K_N+N_n}+k_{NIout}\frac{I_{n,min}^{tot}N_n}{K_N+N_n}.$$
572: In the regime where $N_n\gg K_n$ this gives
573: $$I_{n,min}^{tot}\approx \frac{k_{Iin}}{k_{NIout}}I.$$
574:
575: Using this we can reduce to a 3-variable model:
576: $$\frac{dN_n}{dt}=k_{Nin}K_I\frac{(N_{tot}-N_n)}{K_I+I}-k_{Iin}\frac{IN_n}{\delta+N_n},$$
577: $$\frac{dI_m}{dt}=k_tN_n^2-\gamma_mI_m,$$
578: $$\frac{dI}{dt}=k_{tl}I_m-\alpha\frac{(N_{tot}-N_n)I}{K_I+I}.$$
579:
580: \renewcommand{\thefigure}{S\arabic{figure}}
581: \setcounter{figure}{0}
582: \begin{figure}
583: \input{reductionfig.pstex_t}
584: \caption{\label{suppreducfig}Schematic showing reduction of the 7-variable to a 3-variable model, as well as plots of oscillatory
585: nuclear NF-$\kappa$B from simulations of the 7 and 3-variable models using parameter values given in the text.
586: }
587: \end{figure}
588:
589: \subsection*{Rescaling the 3-variable model}
590: For ease of analysis, we reduce the number of parameters in the model by rescaling
591: all variables to become dimensionless.
592: We use the following transformations on the above equations:
593: $$t\rightarrow (1/\gamma_m)t,$$
594: $$N_n\rightarrow N_{tot}N_n,$$
595: $$I_m\rightarrow (k_tN_{tot}^2/\gamma_m)I_m,$$
596: $$I\rightarrow (k_tk_{tl}N_{tot}^2/\gamma_m^2)I,$$
597: which gives:
598: $$\frac{dN_n}{dt}=A\frac{(1-N_n)}{\epsilon+I}-B\frac{IN_n}{\delta+N_n},$$
599: $$\frac{dI_m}{dt}=N_n^2-I_m$$
600: $$\frac{dI~~}{dt}=I_m-C\frac{(1-N_n)I}{\epsilon+I},$$
601: with
602: $$A=\frac{k_{Nin}K_I\gamma_m}{k_tk_{tl}N_{tot}^2}\approx 0.007,$$
603: $$B=\frac{k_{Iin}k_tk_{tl}N_{tot}}{\gamma_m^3}\approx 954.5,$$
604: $$C=\frac{\alpha\gamma_m}{k_tk_{tl}N_{tot}}\approx 0.035,$$
605: $$\delta=\frac{K_N}{N_{tot}}\approx 0.029,$$
606: $$\epsilon=\frac{K_I\gamma_m^2}{k_tk_{tl}N_{tot}^2}\approx 2\times 10^{-5}.$$
607:
608: \subsection*{Steady state solution of the 3-variable model}
609: The steady state values of $N_n$, $I_m$ and $I$ are solutions to
610: $$A\frac{(1-N_n)}{\epsilon+I}-B\frac{IN_n}{\delta+N_n}=0,$$
611: $$N_n^2-I_m=0,$$
612: $$I_m-C\frac{(1-N_n)I}{\epsilon+I}=0.$$
613:
614: $I_m$ and $I$ can be eliminated
615: using
616: $$I_m=N_n^2,$$
617: $$I=\frac{N_n^2\epsilon}{C-CN_n-N_n^2}.$$
618:
619: From this we find that the steady state value of $N_n$ is a solution of the equation
620: $$(C-CN_n-N_n^2)^2=\frac{BC\epsilon^2}{A}\frac{N_n^3}{\delta+N_n},$$
621: or equivalently,
622: $$N_n^5+(\delta+2C)N_n^4+C\left[2(\delta-1)+C-\frac{B}{A}\epsilon^2\right]N_n^3+C[(C-2)\delta-2C]N_n^2+C^2(1-2\delta)N_n+C^2\delta=0.$$
623:
624: In general, this has two real solutions, one with $C-CN_n-N_n^2>0$ and the other with
625: $C-CN_n-N_n^2<0$. The latter results in a negative value for $I$ and therefore is not
626: an acceptable solution. Thus we are left with only one fixed point.
627:
628: \subsection*{Linear stability of the fixed point}
629: We linearize the equations around the fixed point, which gives the Hessian
630: $$J=\left(
631: \begin{array}{ccc}
632: -\frac{A}{\epsilon+I}-\frac{\delta BI}{(\delta+N_n)^2} & 0 & -\frac{A(1-N_n)}{(\epsilon+I)^2}-\frac{BN_n}{\delta+N_n} \\
633: 2N_n & -1 & 0\\
634: \frac{CI}{\epsilon+I} & 1 & -\frac{C\epsilon(1-N_n)}{(\epsilon+I)^2}\\
635: \end{array}
636: \right)$$
637:
638: This matrix can be used to examine the stability of the fixed point.
639: If $\lambda_i$ are the (possibly complex) eigenvalues of this matrix, then
640: the fixed point is unstable if
641: $${\rm max}_i \left[{\rm Re}(\lambda_i)\right]>0$$
642: and stable if
643: $${\rm max}_i \left[{\rm Re}(\lambda_i)\right]<0.$$
644:
645: \subsection*{Linear production of $I_m$}
646: In this section we consider the effect of taking the production of $I_m$ to
647: be linear in $N_n$, instead of $N_n^2$:
648: $$\frac{dN_n}{dt}=k_{Nin}K_I\frac{(N_{tot}-N_n)}{K_I+I}-k_{Iin}\frac{IN_n}{\delta+N_n},$$
649: $$\frac{dI_m}{dt}=k_tN_n-\gamma_mI_m,$$
650: $$\frac{dI}{dt}=k_{tl}I_m-\alpha\frac{(N_{tot}-N_n)I}{K_I+I}.$$
651:
652: Using very similar transformations, we rescale the variables:
653: $$t\rightarrow (1/\gamma_m)t,$$
654: $$N_n\rightarrow N_{tot}N_n,$$
655: $$I_m\rightarrow (k_tN_{tot}/\gamma_m)I_m,$$
656: $$I\rightarrow (k_tk_{tl}N_{tot}/\gamma_m^2)I,$$
657: which gives:
658: $$\frac{dN_n}{dt}=A\frac{(1-N_n)}{\epsilon+I}-B\frac{IN_n}{\delta+N_n},$$
659: $$\frac{dI_m}{dt}=N_n-I_m,$$
660: $$\frac{dI~~}{dt}=I_m-C\frac{(1-N_n)I}{\epsilon+I},$$
661: with
662: $$A=\frac{k_{Nin}K_I\gamma_m}{k_tk_{tl}N_{tot}},$$
663: $$B=\frac{k_{Iin}k_tk_{tl}}{\gamma_m^3},$$
664: $$C=\frac{\alpha\gamma_m}{k_tk_{tl}},$$
665: $$\delta=\frac{K_N}{N_{tot}},$$
666: $$\epsilon=\frac{K_I\gamma_m^2}{k_tk_{tl}N_{tot}}.$$
667:
668: If we use the same parameter values as before we do not get sustained
669: oscillations. Not surprisingly, the region in parameter space
670: where we get sustained oscillations has shifted. Simply taking
671: $A=0.001$, we get spiky oscillations, as in the original model (Fig. \ref{linearIm_osc}A).
672: Fig. \ref{linearIm_osc}B shows the response to changes in IKK.
673:
674: \begin{figure}
675: {\bf A.\hfill B.\hfill ~}\\
676: \epsfig{height=5cm,file=linearImprod_Nnosc.eps}\hfill
677: \epsfig{height=5cm,file=linearImprod_peakNnvsIKK.eps}\hfill ~\\
678: \caption{\label{linearIm_osc}
679: {\bf A.} Sustained spiky oscillations of nuclear NF-$\kappa$B when the production of $I_m$ is linearly dependent
680: on $N_n$. Parameter values: $A=0.001$, $B=954.5$, $C=0.035$, $\delta=0.029$ and
681: $\epsilon=2\times 10^{-5}$.
682: {\bf B.} Spike peak, the maximum concentration of nuclear NF-$\kappa$B, as a function of IKK concentration.
683: Blue and red signify, respectively, regions of spiky
684: and soft oscillations.
685: }
686: \end{figure}
687:
688: The steady state value of $N_n$ is now a solution to
689: $$(C-CN_n-N_n)^2=\frac{BC\epsilon^2}{A}\frac{N_n^2}{\delta+N_n}.$$
690: The steady value of $I$ can be calculated from the value of $N_n$ using:
691: $$I=\frac{N_n\epsilon}{C-CN_n-N_n}.$$
692:
693: In general, there are again two real solutions, one with $C-CN_n-N_n>0$ and the other with
694: $C-CN_n-N_n<0$. The latter results in a negative value for $I$ and therefore is not
695: an acceptable solution. Thus we are left with only one fixed point.
696:
697: Linearizing the equations around the fixed point gives almost the same Hessian. The only difference
698: is in one matrix element: $J_{2,1}=1$ instead of $2N_n$.
699: Fig. \ref{linearIm_stability} shows the stability of the fixed point as a function of $\epsilon$.
700:
701: \begin{figure}
702: \centerline{\epsfig{height=5cm,file=linearImprod_epsstability.eps}}
703: \caption{\label{linearIm_stability}
704: {\bf A.} Steady state solution for $I$ as a function of the parameter $\epsilon$,
705: when the production of $I_m$ is linearly dependent on $N_n$.
706: Dashed line shows the region where the fixed point is unstable and the solid line
707: shows the region where it is stable. Black dots mark the parameter values used in (B) and (C).
708: The crossover from unstable to stable occurs where $\epsilon$ becomes comparable to the steady
709: state value of $I$, i.e., where the degradation of $I$ stops being saturated.
710: {\bf B.} Trajectory of the system in the $I$-$N_n$ phase plane, for $\epsilon=1\times 10^{-4}$, which converges to
711: a stable limit cycle. {\bf C.} Trajectory of the system, for $\epsilon=2\times 10^{-4}$, which converges
712: to a stable fixed point.
713: }
714: \end{figure}
715:
716: \end{document}
717:
718: