1: % Insects, Trees, and Climate:
2: % The Bioacoustic Ecology of Deforestation and
3: % Entomogenic Climate Change
4: % jpc: 12/01/06
5: % ddd: 12/01/06
6:
7: \documentclass[pre,twocolumn,showpacs,superscriptaddress,preprintnumbers,floatfix]{revtex4}
8:
9: % Packages
10: \usepackage{dcolumn}
11: \usepackage{url}
12: \usepackage{amsmath}
13: \usepackage{amssymb}
14: \usepackage{graphicx}
15: \usepackage{bm} % bold math
16: \usepackage{bbm}
17: \usepackage{verbatim}
18: \usepackage{stmaryrd}
19: %\usepackage{theorem}
20: \usepackage{amsthm}
21: \newcommand\degrees[1]{\ensuremath{#1^\circ}}
22:
23: \begin{document}
24:
25: \title{Insects, Trees, and Climate:\\
26: The Bioacoustic Ecology of Deforestation and\\
27: Entomogenic Climate Change}
28:
29: \author{David Dunn}
30: \email{artscilab@comcast.net}
31: \affiliation{Art and Science Laboratory, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87501}
32:
33: \author{James P. Crutchfield}
34: \email{chaos@cse.ucdavis.edu}
35: \affiliation{Center for Computational Science \& Engineering and Physics Department,
36: University of California Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616}
37: \affiliation{Art and Science Laboratory, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87501}
38:
39: \date{\today}
40:
41: \bibliographystyle{unsrt}
42:
43: % ************************* ABSTRACT *************************
44: \begin{abstract}
45: Accumulating observational evidence suggests an intimate connection between
46: rapidly expanding insect populations, deforestation, and global climate change.
47: We review the evidence, emphasizing the vulnerability of key planetary carbon
48: pools, especially the Earth's forests that link the micro-ecology of insect
49: infestation to climate. We survey current research regimes and insect control
50: strategies, concluding that at present they are insufficient to cope with the
51: problem's present regional scale and its likely future global scale. We propose
52: novel bioacoustic interactions between insects and trees as key drivers of
53: infestation population dynamics and the resulting wide-scale deforestation. The
54: bioacoustic mechanisms suggest new, nontoxic control interventions and
55: detection strategies.
56: \end{abstract}
57:
58: \pacs{
59: % 05.45.Tp % Time series analysis
60: % 89.75.Kd % Complex Systems: Patterns
61: % 02.50.-r % Probability theory, stochastic processes, and statistics
62: % 43.35.-c % Ultrasonics, quantum acoustics, and physical effects of sound
63: % 43.35.Wa % Biological effects of ultrasound, ultrasonic tomography
64: % 43.35.Yb % Ultrasonic instrumentation and measurement techniques
65: % 43.50.Rq % Environmental noise, measurement, analysis, statistical characteristics
66: 43.80.-n % Bioacoustics
67: % 43.80.Cs % Acoustical characteristics of biological media: molecular species, cellular level tissues
68: % 43.80.Ev % Acoustical measurement methods in biological systems and media
69: 43.80.Ka % Sound production by animals: mechanisms, characteristics, populations, biosonar (see also 43.30.Nb and 43.64.Tk)
70: 43.80.Lb % Sound reception by animals: anatomy, physiology, auditory capacities, processing (see also 43.64.Tk, 43.66.Gf)
71: % 87.23.-n % Ecology and evolution
72: % 87.23.Cc % Population dynamics and ecological pattern formation
73: % 87.23.Kg % Dynamics of evolution
74: % 87.50.Kk % Sound and ultrasound
75: % 87.80.Tq % Biological signal processing and instrumentation
76: % 92.70.-j % Global change
77: % 92.70.Aa % Abrupt/rapid climate change
78: % 92.70.Bc % Land/atmosphere interactions
79: 92.70.Mn % Impacts of global change; global warming (see also 92.30.Np—in geophysics appendix)
80: % 92.70.St % Land cover change
81: }
82: %
83:
84: \preprint{Santa Fe Institute Working Paper 06-12-XXX}
85: \preprint{arxiv.org/q-bio.PE/0612XXX}
86:
87: \maketitle
88:
89: % ****************************************************************
90: \tableofcontents
91: % ************************* INTRODUCTION *************************
92:
93: \section{Introduction}
94:
95: Forest ecosystems result from a dynamic balance of soil, insects, plants, animals, and
96: climate. The balance, though, can be destabilized by outbreaks of tree-eating insects.
97: These outbreaks in turn are sensitive to climate, which controls precipitation. Drought
98: stresses trees, rendering them vulnerable to insect predation. The net result is increased
99: deforestation driven by insects and modulated by climate.
100:
101: For their part, many predating insects persist only to the extent they successfully
102: reproduce, which they do by consuming and living within trees. Drought-stressed trees
103: are easier to infest compared to healthy trees, which have more robust defenses
104: against attack. To find trees suitable for reproduction, insects track relevant
105: environmental indicators, including chemical signals and, possibly, bioacoustic
106: ones emitted by stressed trees. At the level of insect populations, infestation dynamics
107: are sensitive to climate via seasonal temperatures. Specifically, insect populations
108: increase markedly each year when winters are short and freezes less severe. The net
109: result is rapidly changing insect populations whose dynamics are modulated by climate.
110:
111: Thus, via temperature and precipitation, climate sets the context for tree growth and
112: insect reproduction and also for the interaction between trees and insects. At the largest
113: scale, climate is driven by absorbed solar energy and controlled by relative fractions
114: of atmospheric gases. The amount of absorbed solar energy is determined by cloud and ground
115: cover. Forests are a prime example, as an important ground cover that absorbs, uses, and
116: re-radiates solar energy in various forms. At the same time forests are key moderators of
117: atmospheric gases. Trees exhaust oxygen and take up carbon dioxide in a process that
118: sequesters in solid form carbon from the atmosphere. As plants and trees evolved, in fact,
119: they altered the atmosphere sufficiently that earth's climate, once inhospitable, changed
120: and now supports a wide diversity of life.
121:
122: There are three stories here: the trees', the insects', and the climate's. They necessarily
123: overlap since the phenomena and interactions they describe co-occur in space and in
124: time. Their overlap hints at an astoundingly complicated system, consisting of many
125: cooperating and competing components; the health of any one depending on the health of
126: others. (Figure 1 gives a schematic view of these components and their interactions.)
127: How are we to understand the individual views as part of a larger whole? In particular,
128: what can result from interactions between the different scales over which insects, trees,
129: and climate adapt?
130:
131: Taking the stories together, we have, in engineering parlance, a \emph{feedback loop}: Going
132: from small to large scale, one sees that insects reproduce by feeding on trees, forests
133: affect regional solar energy uptake and atmospheric gas balance, and, finally, energy
134: storage and atmospheric gases affect climate. Simultaneously, the large scale (climate)
135: sets the context for dynamics on the small scale: temperature modulates insect
136: reproduction and precipitation controls tree growth. The feedback loop of insects, trees,
137: and climate means that new kinds of behavior can appear---dynamics not due to any
138: single player, but to their interactions. Importantly, such feedback loops can maintain
139: ecosystem stability or lead to instability that amplifies even small effects to large scale.
140:
141: \begin{figure}
142: \begin{center}
143: \resizebox{!}{2.50in}{\includegraphics{Interactions.eps}}
144: \end{center}
145: \caption{Interaction of insects, trees, and climate.}
146: \label{fig:Interactions}
147: \end{figure}
148:
149: Here we give a concrete example of the dynamic interaction between insects, trees, and climate.
150: We focus on the role that bark beetles (Scolytidae or, more recently, Curculionidae: Scolytinae)
151: play in large-scale deforestation and consequently in climate change. Bark beetles are emblematic
152: of many different insect species that now participate in rapid deforestation. Likewise, we primarily
153: focus upon the North American boreal forests for their unique characteristics but also as
154: representative of the vulnerability of all types of forest ecosystems. And so, the picture we
155: paint here is necessarily incomplete. Nonetheless, their cases serve to illustrate the complex
156: of interactions that are implicated in the feedback loop and also the current limits to human
157: response. Although they are not alone, bark beetles appear to be an example of a novel
158: player in climate change. Unlike the climatic role that inanimate greenhouse gases are
159: predicted to play in increasing global temperature over the next century, bark beetles
160: represent a biotic agent that actively adapts on the time scale of years but that, despite the
161: short time scale, still can cause effects, such as deforestation, at large spatial scales. To
162: emphasize the novelty of this kind of biological, non-human agent, we refer to the result
163: as \emph{entomogenic climate change}.
164:
165: In analyzing the relationship between the feedback loop components, one important
166: conclusion is that we understand relatively little about the interactions between insects
167: and trees and the dynamics of infestation. In particular, we see that there is a need to
168: expand on the success of, and to acknowledge the limitations of, the dominant chemical
169: ecology model of insect infestation.
170:
171: A detailed analysis of the problem of entomogenic climate change leads us to make a
172: number of constructive suggestions for increased attention to relatively less familiar
173: domains of study, including micro-ecological symbiosis and its nonlinear population
174: dynamics, and insect social organization. Here we emphasize in particular the role that
175: bark beetle bioacoustic behavior must have in their evolving multiple survival
176: adaptations which, it appears, fill in significant gaps in the explanatory model of
177: infestation dynamics. One goal is to stimulate interdisciplinary research that is
178: appropriate to the complex of interactions implicated in deforestation and appropriate
179: to discovering effective control strategies.
180:
181: \section{Forest Health and Climate: A recent snapshot}
182:
183: The Earth's three great forest ecosystems---tropical, temperate, and boreal---are of
184: irreplaceable importance to its self-regulating balance. Their trees help to regulate its
185: climate, provide essential timber resources, and create a diversity of habitat and nutrients
186: that support other forms of life, including millions of people. Forests contribute to global
187: climate dynamics through a carbon cycle in which atmospheric carbon dioxide is converted
188: into an immense carbon pool. At any one point in time, the Earth's forest ecosystems together
189: hold a majority of the Earth's carbon stocks with the boreal forests comprising 49 percent of
190: the total carbon pool contained within these three types of forest ecosystems \cite{Malh99a}.
191: That carbon is then slowly released back into the atmosphere through complicated decomposition
192: processes.
193:
194: All forms of deforestation, human and natural, directly impact climatic conditions by
195: attenuating or delaying the carbon cycle. In concert with well-documented greenhouse
196: gas effects that drive global atmospheric change, the potential loss of large areas of these forests, combined with accelerating deforestation of tropical and temperate regions, may have significant future climate impacts beyond already dire predictions. Ice core studies have revealed
197: that the Earth's climate has varied cyclically over the past 450,000 years. Temperatures have
198: been closely tied to variations in atmospheric carbon dioxide in a cyclic change that recurs
199: on the time scale of millennia. Vegetation has been forced to adapt. The boreal forests are,
200: in fact, highly vulnerable to these climate shifts. Examination of fossil pollen and other
201: fossil records shows that, in response to temperature variations over the past millennia,
202: North American boreal forests have radically changed many times \cite{Lind02a}. The unique
203: sensitivity of these forests' tree species to temperature suggests that the predicted warmer
204: climate will cause their ecological niches to shift north faster than the forests can migrate.
205: Researchers believe that, in addition to other deforestation factors, the boreal forests may
206: eventually be substantially reduced to just half their current size over the next
207: century \cite{Smit00a}.
208:
209: One major consequence of boreal deforestation is increasing fire risk. Even though
210: forests require fire for reproduction and rejuvenation, a warmer climate will most likely
211: push an otherwise natural disturbance to an extreme frequency and scale. Over the next
212: half-century, the Siberian and Canadian boreal forests will most likely see as much as a
213: 50 percent increase in burnt trees \cite{Smit00a}. One of the major sources fueling these fires will be
214: dead and dying trees killed by various opportunistic insect species and their associated
215: microorganisms.
216:
217: Paralleling the concerns about the boreal forests, in recent years there has been a growing
218: awareness of extensive insect outbreaks in various regional forests throughout the
219: western United States. At first, local and national media reported on these outbreaks, and
220: the surprising devastation to forested areas, as the result of regional drought conditions
221: that encouraged various species of bark beetle to thrive. As consecutive summers of
222: unprecedented forest fires consumed the dead and dying trees, though, a new concern
223: emerged: insect-driven deforestation is a much larger threat connected to global climate
224: change. In fact, climate experts, forestry personnel, and biologists, have all observed that
225: these outbreaks are an inevitable consequence of a climatic shift to warmer temperatures \cite{Smit00a}.
226:
227: Biologists are now voicing concern that the problem exceeds any of the earlier
228: projections. Evidence from diverse research sources suggests we are entering an
229: unprecedented planetary event: forest ecology is rapidly changing due to exploding
230: plant-consuming (\emph{phytophagous}) insect populations. In 2004, NASA's Global Disturbances
231: project analyzed nineteen years of satellite data ending in 2000. It revealed rapid
232: defoliation over a brief period (1995 to 2000) of a vast region that extends from the
233: US-Canadian border in western Canada to Alaska. The conclusion was that the
234: devastation resulted from two different insects, the mountain pine beetle (\emph{Dendroctonus
235: ponderosae}) and the western spruce budworm (\emph{Choristoneura occidentalis})
236: \cite{Cohe04a}. Ecologist
237: Chris Potter (NASA Ames Research Center) said at the time \cite{Cohe04a}: ``This looks like
238: something new happening on a huge scale. It's a sudden shift into a new kind of forest
239: condition.''
240:
241: Now, two years later we know of even further damage. In Alaska, spruce bark beetles
242: (\emph{Dendroctonus rufipennis}) have killed 4.4 million acres of forest
243: \cite{Joli06a}. This damage results
244: from only one such insect. Alaska is also witnessing population explosions of many
245: others, including the western spruce budworm, the black-headed budworm (\emph{Acleris
246: gloverana Walsingham}), the amber-marked birch leaf miner (\emph{Profenusa thomsoni}), and
247: the aspen leaf miner (\emph{Phyllocnistis populiella}). In British Columbia the mountain pine
248: beetle has infested 21 million acres and killed 411 million cubic feet of trees. This is
249: twice the annual take by all the loggers in Canada. The general consensus is that beetles
250: will soon take 80 percent of the pines in the central forest of British Columbia. The Canadian
251: Forest Service now calls the beetle invasion of Canada the largest known insect
252: infestation in North American history \cite{Stru06a}.
253:
254: Jesse Logan (USDA Forest Service) and James Powell (Utah State University, Logan)
255: discussed the serious implications that a continuing warming trend will have on the
256: range expansion of the mountain pine beetle into both higher elevations and more
257: northern latitudes \cite{Loga01a}. At the time, one concern was that the beetles would breach the
258: Canadian Rockies and expand into the great boreal forests of Canada. Historically, these
259: forests have been immune to beetles due to predictably severe winter conditions that
260: greatly attenuate beetle populations. Since much of Canada has seen mean winter
261: temperature increases as high as $\degrees{4}$C in the last century, and even faster changes recently,
262: the conditions for the beetles are improving rapidly. As British Columbia forestry officer
263: Michael Pelchat recently said \cite{Stru06a}: ``We are seeing this pine beetle do things that have
264: never been recorded before. They are attacking younger trees, and attacking timber in
265: altitudes they have never been before.''
266:
267: It is now well established that mountain pine beetles have slipped through mountain
268: passes from the Peace River country in northern British Columbia to Alberta, the most
269: direct corridor to the boreal forests. If the beetle is successful at adapting to and
270: colonizing Canada's jack pine, there will be little to stop it moving through the immense
271: contiguous boreal forest, all the way to Labrador and the North American east coast. It
272: then will have a path down into the forests of eastern Texas. Entomologist Jesse Logan
273: \cite{Loga01a} describes this as ``a potential geographic event of continental scale with unknown, but
274: potentially devastating, ecological consequences.''
275:
276: Continental migration aside, if the beetles infest the high-elevation conifers, the so-called
277: five-needle pines, of the western United States, this will reduce the snow-fence effect that
278: these alpine forests provide. Snow fences hold windrows of captured snow that are
279: crucial to the conservation and distribution of water from the Rocky Mountains. This is
280: one of the primary origins of water that sources several major river systems in North
281: America \cite{Loga01a}. The Rocky Mountains and the Southwest have seen massive die off of
282: ponderosa and pinion pines numbering in the millions due to bark beetle infestation.
283: Every western state is contending with various rates of unprecedented insect infestation
284: not only by many different species of Scolytidae, but also by other plant-eating insects.
285:
286: While the conifers of the boreal forests have been the most dramatically affected, many temperate forest tree species are also
287: struggling. The emerald ash borer (\emph{Agrilus planipennis}) has killed over 20 million ash
288: trees in Michigan, Ohio, and Indiana. In 2006 it was observed to have moved into
289: northern Illinois and Ontario, Canada \cite{Carl06a}. A large, wood-boring conifer pest, the sirex
290: woodwasp (\emph{Sirex noctilio})---native to Europe and Asia---has now entered several New
291: York counties and southern Canada. It has recently devastated millions of pine trees in
292: Australia, South America, and South Africa \cite{Carl06a}. These and other rising populations of
293: phytophagous insects are now becoming recognized as a global problem and one of the
294: most obvious and fast emerging consequences of global climate change. Over the past
295: fifteen years there have been reports of unusual and unprecedented outbreaks occurring
296: on nearly every continent.
297:
298: \section{What Drives Infestations?}
299:
300: Several well-understood factors underlie how climate change impacts insect populations.
301: The two dominant environmental factors are changes in temperature and moisture.
302: Changing insect-host relationships and nonhost species impacts, such as predation and
303: disease, also play essential roles.
304:
305: Since insects are cold-blooded (\emph{poikilothermic}), they are extremely sensitive to
306: temperature, being more active at higher temperatures. As winter temperatures increase,
307: there are fewer freezing conditions that keep insect populations in check than in the past.
308: Shortened winters, increasing summer temperatures, and fewer late-spring frosts correlate
309: to increased insect feeding, faster growth rates, and rapid reproduction.
310:
311: Moisture availability and variability are also major determinants of insect habitat---forest
312: health and boundaries. Drought creates many conditions that are favorable to increased
313: insect reproduction. Many drought-induced plant characteristics are attractive to insects.
314: Higher plant surface temperatures, leaf yellowing, increased infrared reflectance, biochemical
315: changes, and possibly stress-induced cavitation acoustic emissions, may all be
316: positive signals to insects of host vulnerability. Drought also leads to increased food
317: value in plant tissues through nutrient concentration, while reducing defensive
318: compounds. These last factors may in turn increase the efficacy of insect immune
319: systems and therefore enhance their ability to detoxify remaining plant defenses. Higher
320: temperatures and decreased moisture may also decrease the activity of insect diseases and
321: predator activity while optimizing conditions for mutualistic microorganisms that benefit
322: insect growth \cite{Matt87a}.
323:
324: One of the most frequently noted impacts of global climate change is the
325: desynchronization of biotic developmental patterns---such as as the inability of forests to
326: migrate as quickly as other aspects of their ecological niches---that have remained
327: coherent for millennia. This de-coupling between various elements of an ecosystem is
328: one of the most unpredictable and disruptive results of abrupt climate change. As
329: environmental scientists, Jeff Price (California State Univ., Chico) and Terry Root
330: (Stanford) state it, when discussing the impact of mean temperature increase
331: \cite{Pric06a}:
332: \begin{quote}
333: As many tree species are long-lived and migrate slowly they would be expected
334: to slowly colonize to the north of their range (or up in elevation), while at the
335: southern edge of their range their rate of reproduction slows and finally stops.
336: Even once a species stopped reproducing, the habitat may not undergo much
337: compositional change until the existing community dies out. Thus, it could take
338: decades to centuries for species in some vegetative communities to be replaced
339: by others. As increased temperatures and drought stress plants, they become
340: more susceptible to fires and insect breaks. These disturbances will likely play a
341: large role in the conversion of habitats from one type to another. There could
342: very well be instances where the existing plant communities are lost to
343: disturbance but climatic conditions and migration rates limit the speed by which
344: a new vegetative community replaces the original. Thus, some areas may
345: transitionally be replaced by grasslands, shrublands and, especially, by invasive
346: species. The probability of these transitional habitats may very well be increased
347: with abrupt climate change.
348: \end{quote}
349:
350: Unfortunately, insects respond to changes in their thermal environment much faster than
351: their hosts, either through migration, adaptation, or evolution. Under the stress of abrupt
352: climate change the only short-term limit on their increasing populations may be their near
353: total elimination of suitable hosts. In short, trees only adapt slowly to changing
354: conditions, while insects can disperse widely and adapt much faster to abrupt
355: environmental changes. One conclusion is that the static, architectural view of Fig. 1
356: needs to be augmented to indicate the wide range of time scales involved. Table I gives
357: rough estimates of the times over which various feedback loop components and their
358: interactions adapt.
359:
360: \begin{table}[tbp]
361: \begin{tabular}{|l||c|c|}
362: \hline
363: \multicolumn{3}{|c|}{Time Scales} \\
364: \hline
365: \hline
366: Component & Character & Years \\
367: \hline
368: \hline
369: Climate & Season & $1$ \\
370: & Temperature & $10^2$ \\
371: & Glaciation & $10^4$ \\
372: \hline
373: Forest & Migration & $10^2-10^3$ \\
374: \hline
375: Tree & Infestation response & $10^{-2}$ \\
376: & Death due to infestation & $10^{-1}$ \\
377: & Life cycle & $10^2$ \\
378: & Evolution & $10^4-10^5$ \\
379: \hline
380: Bark Beetle & Tree nesting & $10^{-2}$ \\
381: & Migration & $10^{-1} - 10^{-2}$ \\
382: & Life cycle & $1$ \\
383: & Adaptation & $10$ \\
384: & Evolution & $10^2$ \\
385: \hline
386: \end{tabular}
387: \caption{Time Scales in Entomogenic Climate Change.}
388: \label{tab:TimeScales}
389: \end{table}
390:
391: \section{The Tree's Perspective}
392:
393: While it is clear that under extreme conditions phytophagous insects and their associated
394: microorganisms can quickly gain the advantage against host trees, it is also true that trees
395: have evolved effective defense mechanisms. For example, in their defense against bark
396: beetles there are two recognized components: the \emph{preformed resin system} and the \emph{induced
397: hypersensitivity response}. Once a beetle bores through the outer tree bark into the inner
398: tissues, resin ducts are severed and its flow begins. A beetle contends with the resin flow
399: by removing resin from its entrance hole. Trees that are sufficiently hydrated often
400: manage to ``pitch-out'' the invader through sufficient flow of resin. In some conifer
401: species with well-defined resin-duct systems, resin is stored and available for beetle
402: defense. The \emph{monoterpenes} within the resin also have antibiotic and repellent properties
403: to defend against beetle-associated fungi \cite{Nebe93a}.
404:
405: The induced hypersensitivity response is usually a secondary defense system; it is also
406: known as \emph{wound response}. It produces secondary resinosis, cellular dessication, tissue
407: necrosis, and wound formation---essentially a tree's attempt to isolate and deprive
408: nutrition to an invading organism. In species without well-defined resin-duct systems it is
409: often a primary defense mechanism. In both cases these defense strategies are very
410: susceptible to variations in temperature and available moisture. Their efficacy also varies
411: with different beetle species \cite{Nebe93a}.
412:
413: A series of extremely warm summers in Alaska, starting in 1987, resulted in the
414: dispersal of spruce bark beetles on the Kenai Peninsula when trees were water
415: stressed and greater beetle brood sizes survived the winter. This also halved
416: beetle development times from a two-year to a one-year cycle. The result was a
417: major increase in beetle activity that grew every year until most of the mature trees were dead \cite{Symo05a}. Since winter survivability and the number of eggs laid by bark beetles is
418: directly correlated to ambient temperature \cite{Lomb00a}, it is no surprise that similar increases in
419: yearly beetle population cycles have been observed throughout the western states and
420: provinces as warming and local drought conditions have persisted \cite{Wagn04a}.
421: As Table 1 makes clear the relative time scales for increased infestation rates, and
422: subsequent adaptive tree response, can put host trees at a serious disadvantage with
423: regard to even the short-term effects of climatic warming.
424:
425: \section{Bark Beetles: Known and Unknown}
426:
427: While many of the issues concerning bark beetle behavior and control can be generalized
428: to other insect groups, many others cannot. With this limitation in mind, we must narrow the
429: discussion to bark beetles to complete our analysis of the feedback loop. There are
430: several essential questions that dominate the study of bark beetles, many of which have
431: been pursued in an attempt to define viable infestation control strategies. These are:
432: \begin{enumerate}
433: \item \emph{The Pioneer Beetle}: Exactly how does a new beetle generation find new suitable
434: host trees? Is the process merely random or are host-mediated attractants
435: involved? Is one adaptation universal to all Scolytidae or are different processes
436: used by different species?
437: \item \emph{Communication}: How do bark beetles communicate in order to mate, defend
438: territory, coordinate tree-attack, and reduce competition within the host?
439: \item \emph{Beetles, Trees, and Microorganisms}: What controls the symbiotic micro-ecology
440: between host trees, beetles, and the microorganisms that mediate between them?
441: \end{enumerate}
442:
443: While humans have always been in a competitive interaction with insects, this has largely
444: been a stalemate. Insects have readily adapted to many of our control strategies and some
445: of our most effective defenses have had a tendency to backfire. In the case of the current
446: North American bark beetle invasions, attempts at intervention are proving mostly
447: negligible. The Canadian Forest Service, in response to the mountain pine beetle invasion
448: of British Columbia, thinned healthy forests, cut down and burned infested trees, and set
449: out beetle traps while hoping for a deep freeze that never came. Micheal Pelchat
450: (Canadian Forest Service) describes what happened: ``We lost. They built up into an army
451: and came across \cite{Stru06a}.'' Though ineffective, it is sobering to realize that such measures still
452: constitute our only defensive arsenal as the beetles move into the boreal forests.
453:
454: \subsection{Chemical Micro-ecology}
455:
456: Over the past thirty years many hundreds of scientific papers have been published on
457: bark beetles. Among reported observations, the majority focused on beetle chemical
458: ecology. A much smaller percentage addressed alternative aspects of beetle biology and
459: their relationship to the environment. In some ways this has been, for good reason, due to
460: the growth of the field. Chemical ecology has been one of the major successes in 20$^{\mathrm{th}}$
461: century entomology. As Edward O. Wilson (Harvard) states \cite{Eisn03a}:
462: \begin{quote}
463: The discipline that came into existence as a result of the pointillist studies by
464: Eisner, Jerrold Meinwald, and a few other pioneers was chemical ecology. Its
465: importance arises from the fact that the vast majority of organisms---surely more
466: than 99 percent of all species when plants, invertebrates, and microorganisms are
467: thrown in---orient, communicate, subdue prey and defend themselves by
468: chemical means.
469: \end{quote}
470: As this emphasizes, much of the living world communicates through chemical
471: signaling---intentional or inadvertent---especially through those compounds exchanged
472: between members of the same species, called \emph{pheromones}, or through those chemical
473: cues emitted by a prey source for the benefit of the predator, called \emph{kairomones}.
474: Chemical ecology is the study of these compounds that attempts to unravel and map this
475: extensive chemical
476: language through analysis of both chemical compounds and observation of the behavior
477: of living organisms correlated to them. It also seeks to discover how these compounds are
478: created and how to synthesize them for possible manipulation of their creators---such as
479: bark beetles \cite{Agos92a}.
480:
481: The conventional and widely held chemical ecology model for bark beetle-tree
482: interactions is easily summarized. Like many other insects, bark beetles manufacture
483: communicative pheromones from molecular constituents that they draw from host trees. Some species of beetle are specialists that prefer a single species of tree while others have adapted to a range of different tree species.
484: Different species can also favor different host conditions: live trees, weak or dying trees, or recently fallen timber. The breeding site within a host also varies, with different species taking up residence in either the lower or
485: upper trunk, with still others preferring the crown. Presumably, this localization evolved
486: to reduce competition between species, allowing a diversity to co-exist in a single tree.
487: Many of the vast number of different Scolytidae species have evolved to maintain a non-lethal relationship to their hosts. Others have evolved to normally colonize dead or dying trees at normal low-population densities but can colonize living trees when populations reach high levels.
488: Finally, there are the primary bark beetle species that normally kill their hosts. These species, that are usually the most destructive, can stage a mass attack and use aggregation pheromones between beetles to trigger this behavior.
489:
490: \subsection{Pioneer Beetle: Infestation linchpin}
491:
492: An attack begins with the pioneer beetle that locates, by means not yet elucidated, and lands
493: upon a suitable host. Others join this beetle, all soon boring through the outer bark into
494: the phloem and cambium layers where eggs are laid after mating. Within the resulting
495: galleries that house the adult beetles and their eggs, the larvae hatch, pupate, and undergo
496: metamorphosis into adulthood. In this way, they spend the largest fraction of their life-cycle (anywhere between 2 months to two years depending upon species and geographic location) inside a tree. This new generation emerges from the bark and flies
497: away to seek new host trees. The widely held hypothesis is that the pioneer also attract
498: other beetles to the host through a pheromone signal. In some species the pioneer is male
499: and, in others, female. Each new beetle that is attracted to the host subsequently
500: contributes to the general release of the aggregation pheromone. It is also theorized that
501: the aggregation pheromone has an upper limit beyond which attracted beetles will land
502: on adjacent trees rather than the initial host, since high concentrations would indicate
503: over-use of the available host resources. Resident bacteria within the beetles may facilitate
504: the production of aggregation pheromones. The aggregation pheromone of one species also
505: tends to repel other species \cite{Agos92a}.
506:
507: As new research has filled in the gaps of the chemical ecology model, it has become
508: clearer that it is often over-simplified. There are a large number of nonchemical
509: mediating factors that are both independent of pheromone signaling and directly affective
510: of its role. The model tends to emphasize the chemical and olfactory mechanisms of bark
511: beetles and downplays, or simply ignores, a large array of other factors. In some ways,
512: regarding its dominance in the study of bark beetles, the chemical paradigm has become a
513: victim of its own success. While proving to be a seemingly inexhaustible well of new
514: hypotheses about the chemical intricacies of these creatures and their relationship to host
515: trees, it has failed to answer many of the central questions about their reproductive and
516: mating behavior and so their infestation dynamics.
517:
518: One hope has been that understanding bark beetle chemical ecology would lead to its
519: manipulation and eventually to a viable forestry management tool. Much to our loss,
520: nothing of the sort has been forthcoming. This largely derives from the sheer complexity
521: of the insect-tree micro-ecology and how far away we are from a sufficient understanding
522: of mechanisms and interactions. The two major contributions of chemical ecology
523: research to control measures have been those of pesticides and pheromone trapping. Most
524: biologists appreciate that pesticides have a very limited role in controlling insect
525: infestations at the scales in question. Pheromone traps are one of the essential tools of
526: field research in entomology, but adapting them for large-scale control has been
527: controversial at best; see Borden 1997 \cite{Bord97a} for an overview. Some researchers and
528: chemical manufacturers assert that they have a positive effect in collecting, condensing,
529: and re-directing of beetle populations \cite{Schl01a}. Other researchers, however, claim that these
530: effects are inconclusive and, worse, in some cases may exacerbate negative conditions
531: \cite{Wesl92a}. In any case, effective traps and synthetic pheromone production are costly and their
532: toxicity is undetermined.
533:
534: These issues are illustrated by the only large-scale study of the effectiveness of
535: pheromone trapping. In 1979 a massive outbreak of the European spruce bark beetle (\emph{Ips
536: typographus}) spread through the forests of Norway and Sweden. A large trap-out
537: program was implemented in an attempt to counter the invasion of the Scandinavian
538: spruce forests. 600,000 baited pheromone traps were placed throughout the infested
539: forest. It yielded a ``capture'' of three billion beetles in 1979 and four billion in 1980.
540: Despite what appears to be substantial numbers of captured beetles, ultimately the
541: infestation was devastating. It appeared to have simply run its course. Trap effectiveness
542: could not easily be evaluated. No consensus conclusions were drawn as to whether the
543: deforestation would have been worse or better without them. Notably, despite increased
544: infestation, no pheromone intervention of this scale has been attempted since.
545: Unfortunately, there is still no clear picture of what was accomplished \cite{Agos92a}.
546:
547: Given the differing scientific opinions and the as-yet undemonstrated benefits,
548: pheromone trapping, the control strategy that derives from the chemical ecology
549: paradigm, remains controversial. The apparent ineffectiveness of large-scale pheromone
550: trapping, though, illustrates one of the central unanswered questions of the pioneer beetle.
551: An underlying assumption of chemical ecology is that pheromones are the primary
552: attractant for beetles seeking new hosts, but this remains a hypothesis. While many
553: researchers believe that attraction is olfactory, others propose that visual cues are key for
554: some species \cite{Camp06a}. Importantly, forestry management policy is based largely on the
555: chemical ecology hypothesis that olfaction is dominant. It has never been definitively
556: proven, however, and, for a number of reasons, it is unlikely to be. Stated simply, foraging
557: insects most likely use whatever cues are the most accurate and easily assessed under varying
558: circumstances. To assume otherwise is to go against the common logic that living
559: systems evolve multiple survival strategies to cope with environmental complexity.
560:
561: \subsection{More Pieces of the Puzzle}
562:
563: Other aspects of bark beetle behavior also remain mysterious. One of the most curious
564: observations concerns the role lightning-damaged trees play in sustaining populations of
565: some bark beetle species. For example, lightning plays an essential role in the ecology of
566: southern pine beetle (\emph{Dendroctonus frontalis}) populations in the Gulf Coastal Plain.
567: Notably, infestations are observed to begin in the spring when beetle populations are usually
568: low and lightening is frequent. Some years, records show that 75 percent of beetle
569: infestations were associated with lightning strikes. In addition, the number of beetles in a
570: struck tree averages nearly four times that of an unstruck, but infested tree. While there
571: are obvious and dramatic chemical changes that occur after such a strike, none explain
572: this extraordinary behavior, especially how beetles of several different species can be
573: attracted from a substantial distance to a single struck tree. It appears that no substantial
574: hypothesis has been put forward \cite{Hodg71a}. This is one aspect of bark beetle
575: behavior that begs for a novel perspective and, therefore, a new explanatory mechanism.
576:
577: Another more recent curious observation concerns how some bark beetle infestations are
578: associated with certain rock and tree stand types. A recent study, using landscape-level
579: geographic analysis of the Panhandle National Forests of northern Idaho and eastern
580: Washington, shows a correlation of Douglas-Fir beetle (\emph{Dendroctonus pseudotsugae})
581: infestation rates with certain geologic strata and forest stand types. While the authors of
582: this study speculate that perhaps the correlation is due to variations in nutrient stress that
583: impact tree vulnerability, to date no research has verified this \cite{Garr03a}. In fact, the hypothesis that this effect can be correlated to nutrient stress says nothing about the nature of the tree vulnerability cues that might be communicated to beetles.
584:
585: One of the most exciting areas of bark beetle research analyzes the complex
586: micro-ecological dynamics between beetles, various forms of fungi, and diverse species of
587: mites. For example, we now know that almost every state and federal information
588: website gives an incomplete description of how bark beetles kill conifers. The story is
589: that it is a fungus, carried by the beetle, which infects a tree's vascular system, choking
590: off the flow of nutrients. While it is true that a compromised vascular system can
591: ultimately kill a tree, the websites describe the relationship between blue-stain fungus
592: (genus \emph{Ophiostoma}) and the beetles as if there is only one organism and only one such
593: species of fungus involved. The truth is that there is no clear consensus about what
594: actually kills host trees. The emerging picture is a very complex one that involves many participatory agents. In fact, many different species of
595: \emph{Ophiostoma} and many other genera of fungi---including \emph{Entomocorticium},
596: \emph{Ceratocystiopsis}, \emph{Trichosporium}, \emph{Leptographium}, and \emph{Ceratocystis}---are involved \cite{Pain97a}.
597: There are probably other interspecific interactions between different species of beetles that are
598: also significant \cite{Byer81a}. Moreover, mites that live on the beetles also
599: carry the fungi \cite{Hofs06a}.
600:
601: The resulting picture is of a constantly shifting dynamic that includes fungi, mites,
602: beetles, and trees. Moreover, the relationships involve different modes of symbiosis:
603: parasitism, mutualism, and commensalism. Each of these, in turn, affects infestation
604: dynamics in different ways. This might seem like a hopelessly complicated
605: micro-ecology. However, it is this very diversity that leads to the hope that
606: unraveling its complexity may contribute towards new biological control regimes
607: \cite{Klep01a}.
608:
609: Since these mysteries and micro-ecological dynamics cannot be adequately explained by the familiar aspects of the chemical ecology paradigm, there is a need to look for other explanatory mechanisms that might bridge the gaps in our understanding or offer novel insights.
610:
611: \subsection{The Bioacoustic Ecology Hypothesis}
612:
613: The motivation to search out novel control regimes is clearly a response to the serious
614: limitations that chemical control strategies have faced. This has necessitated both a
615: search for entirely new areas of investigation, such as the previously mentioned
616: micro-ecological dynamics, and a resurgence in areas of research that have received minimal
617: attention in the past.
618:
619: One of the more neglected research domains regarding bark beetles concerns their
620: remarkable bioacoustic abilities. The sound producing mechanism in many bark beetles is
621: most likely a \emph{pars stridens} organ that functions as a friction-based grating surface.
622: In \emph{Ips confusus} beetles it is located on the back of the head and stroked by
623: a \emph{plectrum} on the under side of the dorsal anterior edge of the prothorax.
624: In other species (\emph{Dendroctonus}) the pars stridens is located on the surface
625: under the elytra and near the apices and sutural margins. Another is found in some
626: species on the underside of the head. All three of these sound generating organs
627: produce a variety of chirps that range from simple single-impulse clicks to a range
628: of different multi-impulse chirps. These also differ between genders of the same
629: species and between different species probably due to subtle differences in the
630: sound producing mechanisms. Collectively, all of the sounds and their associated
631: mechanisms are referred to as \emph{stridulation}, the most common form of sound
632: production made by various forms of beetle \cite{Barr69a}.
633:
634: In monogamous species of bark beetles, such as those of the genus
635: \emph{Dendroctonus}, the female is the pioneer and does not possess the complex
636: pars stridens that the male uses. The opposite is true of the polygamous \emph{Ips}
637: genus where the male is the pioneer and the female the one with a pars stridens
638: organ. In both cases, however, the pioneer is also known to produce simpler forms
639: of communicative signaling using other, less understood sound generating
640: mechanisms. We do know that there are at least 14 different types of stridulatory
641: organs amongst adult beetles in thirty different families \cite{Wess06a}. So the potential
642: for undiscovered varieties of such mechanisms among Scolytidae is high.
643:
644: Past research suggested that sound making and
645: perception in bark beetles was of low significance compared to their chemical-signaling
646: mechanisms. In fact, of the studies that dealt with their acoustic behavior, over half
647: concentrated on the relationship of sound generation to chemical signaling. These include
648: the role stridulation sound-making has in controlling attack spacing between entry points
649: in the host \cite{Byer89a} or the triggering of pheromone release between genders
650: \cite{Rudi76a}. The resulting view is that bark beetles use a combination of chemical
651: and acoustic signals to regulate aggression, attack on host trees, courtship, mating
652: behavior, and population density.
653:
654: While the dual behavioral mechanisms of scent and sound are largely
655: inseparable, it is usually assumed that bark beetles use chemical messages for
656: communication at a distance while reserving acoustic signals for close-range
657: communication. However, this distinction remains hypothetical. We do not have a
658: definitive understanding of how far either their pheromones or sound signals can travel,
659: let alone a full appreciation of the diverse forms of acoustic signaling that they may
660: employ. We do know that both communication mechanisms are used after beetles have
661: aggregated on a host and that one form of signaling can evoke the other.
662:
663: Bark beetles exhibit an amazing array of complex social behaviors---such as, group
664: living, coordination of mass attack, the necessity for mass infestation to effectively
665: counter host defenses, signaling to reduce intraspecific competition, and the collective
666: occupation of nuptial chambers by polygamous species. This complexity implies that the
667: coupling between communication mechanisms is significant. Despite the importance that
668: their acoustic communication must have for overall survival and environmental fitness,
669: there are still no published studies on their sound reception mechanisms or any
670: identification of hearing organs.
671:
672: The broad neglect of bark-beetle bioacoustic behavior has also led to a lack of follow-up
673: on the proposal that host trees themselves produce acoustic cues that also attract pioneer
674: beetles. Perhaps the earliest proposal dates back to 1987, when William Mattson
675: and Robert Haack
676: (USDA, Forest Service) speculated that cavitation events in trees might produce
677: acoustic signals audible to plant-eating insects \cite{Matt87a}. Cavitation occurs in trees by breaking
678: of the water columns in the conducting xylem tissue of leaves, stems, and trunks. The
679: assumption has been that the sounds are vibrations coming from individual cells
680: collapsing, which is due to gradual dehydration and prolonged water stress. While
681: cavitation produces some acoustic emissions in the audible range, most occur in the
682: ultrasound range. In fact, counting ultrasonic acoustic emissions from cavitating xylem
683: tissues is a widely accepted monitoring practice used by botanists to measure drought
684: stress in trees. Despite its common usage in botany, there has been very little study as to
685: the actual generating mechanism. For the most part, it is merely a statistical measuring
686: tool and the correlation between the incidence of cavitations and drought stress, an
687: accepted fact \cite{Jack96a}.
688:
689: This proposal requires, of course, that bark beetles be able to perceive the
690: drought-stressed tree's ultrasonic acoustic emissions. At the present time, while insect
691: sound-making mechanisms are fairly well understood, this is not the case with their auditory
692: organs. Nonetheless, every year the list of insect species shown to have ultrasonic hearing
693: grows. It now includes many species of butterflies and moths (\emph{Lepidoptera}), mantids
694: (\emph{Mantodea}), grasshoppers and crickets (\emph{Orthoptera}), flies (\emph{Diptera}), and net-veined
695: insects (\emph{Neuroptera}).
696:
697: There has also been increasing investigation of interspecific sensing
698: in the ultrasonic range, such as the influence of bat echolocation on the evolution of
699: moths and butterflies. In fact, it appears that much of the evolution of ultrasonic hearing
700: in flying insects has been driven by this essential predator-prey relationship. These
701: insects have evolved a startle response to the presence of echolocating bat chirps and take
702: avoidance measures by suddenly dropping in flight \cite{Hoy89a}.
703:
704: Interestingly, despite their being the largest insect order, there have been only two kinds
705: of beetles (Coleoptera) discovered to have tympanum-hearing organs: scarabs
706: (Scarabaeidae) and tiger beetles (Cicindelidae). This appears to be more a matter of lack
707: of study than a general characteristic of the order. Researchers believe that many other ultrasound sensitive beetles will soon be discovered \cite{Forr97a}.
708:
709: \subsection{Testing the Hypothesis}
710:
711: Recent fieldwork by one of us (DDD) focused on sound production by the pinion engraver
712: beetle (\emph{Ips confuses}). Sounds were recorded within the interior phloem layer of
713: the trees, often adjacent to beetle nuptial chambers. A rich and varied acoustic ecology
714: was documented---an ecology that goes beyond the previously held assumptions about
715: the role of sound within this species \cite{Dunn06a}. Another important observation was
716: that much of the sound production by this species has a very strong ultrasonic component.
717: Since communication systems seldom evolve through investing substantial resources into a
718: portions of the frequency spectrum that an organism cannot both generate and perceive
719: \cite{Dunn06b}, this raised the question of whether or not bark beetles have a complementary
720: ultrasonic auditory capability.
721:
722: Recent laboratory investigations by Jayne Yack (Neuroethology Lab, Carleton University)
723: have also revealed ultrasound components in some bark beetle signals and indirect
724: evidence that the beetles might possess sensory organs for hearing airborne sounds. One
725: possible implication that arises from the combination of these laboratory and field
726: observations is that various bark beetle species may possess organs capable of hearing
727: ultrasound for conspecific communication and are therefore preadpated for listening to
728: diverse auditory cues from trees \cite{Yack06a}.
729:
730: If further evidence of ultrasonic perception can be verified in this and other bark beetle
731: species, then a number of interesting possibilities arise. It has been a working assumption
732: among entomologists studying Scolytidae that bark beetles are not under predation
733: pressure from insectivorous bats. The claim is that bark beetles do not fly at night.
734: This would mean that the most likely explanation for bark beetles evolving an ultrasonic
735: hearing capability is not applicable since it would be, in familiar evolutionary terms,
736: an unnecessary adaptation. Thus, it would appear that such an adaptation must have evolved
737: to monitor environmental sound cues, such as cavitation acoustic emissions, or a previously
738: unknown intraspecific signaling system in the ultrasonic range. If verified, this would
739: contribute substantially to an improved understanding of the role that sonic communication
740: plays in the development, organization, and behavior of bark beetles---a key and previously
741: unsuspected role.
742:
743: \subsection{Multimodal Sensing, Communication, and Social Organization}
744:
745: In the overall scheme of entomogenic climate change, the complex feedback loop appears
746: to turn critically on the bioacoustic and chemical-mediated interactions between beetles
747: and trees. Given this, where else might we look for control methods?
748:
749: While receiving little or no concerted attention, there is one area of possible bark beetle
750: research that warrants discussion since it could have important impacts on the design of
751: new control methods. While bark beetles appear to have a complex communication
752: system that uses both chemical and acoustic forms of signaling, the question of how
753: complex their social organization might be has seldom been asked. Again, behaviors such
754: as group living, coordination of mass attack, the necessity for mass infestation to
755: effectively counter host defenses, signaling to reduce intraspecific competition, and the
756: collective occupation of nuptial chambers by polygamous species, seem to imply that
757: some level of rudimentary social awareness is implicated in bark beetle behavior and
758: necessary for survival of the various species. How far this resembles more familiar forms
759: of insect eusocial behavior remains an open question.
760:
761: In recent years the important role of insect communication through vibrational substrates
762: has become clear. Despite the dominance of chemical ecology, one now reads that of insect
763: species using mechanical communication (sound in air, ripples on water, and so on)
764: \cite{Cocr05a}: ``92 percent use substrate vibrations alone or in concert with other
765: forms of mechanical signaling.''
766: Reginald Cocroft (University of Missouri-Columbia) has hypothesized that for many
767: group-living insects that feed on plants, substrate vibrational signaling is an essential
768: aspect of how they exploit environmental resources. He suggests that there are at least
769: three different kinds of challenges to these insects that are met by communication
770: through plant substrates: locating and remaining in a conspecific group, locating food,
771: and avoiding predators \cite{Cocr01b}.
772:
773: We are most familiar with the complex eusocial systems and
774: related (and essential) communication systems of bees, wasps, ants, and termites. The
775: above acoustic fieldwork has led us to conclude that there must be a larger range of forms
776: of insect sociality and therefore means of organizational communication. More precise
777: understanding of these forms of social organization may improve our ability to design
778: better control systems, whether these are chemical, acoustic, or biological.
779:
780: In investigating the sound communication of pinion engraver beetles, one conclusion
781: became inescapable. The phloem and cambium layers of pinion trees are an amazingly
782: effective medium for acoustic communication. Individual stridulations can carry for
783: several feet within the tree bark interior, most of which are inaudible to an outside
784: (human) listener or to sensitive recording apparatus. Moreover, the diverse sounds made
785: by the pinion engraver beetles appear to effectively match the combination of cellulose,
786: fluids, and air that comprise these tissue layers. In communication theory terms, there is
787: an effective impedance match between sound generator and the transmission medium.
788: These layers are also an appropriate acoustic medium for several other invertebrate sound
789: makers. The field recordings reveal that the tree interior is a rich and teaming world of
790: sound \cite{Dunn06b}---its own bioacoustic ecology.
791:
792: These observations raise an important issue not addressed by previous bark beetle
793: bioacoustic research. A very diverse range of sound signaling persists well after
794: the putatively associated behaviors---host selection, coordination of attack, courtship,
795: territorial competition, and nuptial chamber excavations---have all taken place. In
796: fully colonized trees the stridulations, chirps, and clicks can go on continuously for
797: days and weeks, long after most of these other behaviors will have apparently run their
798: course. These observations suggest that these insects have a more sophisticated social
799: organization than previously suspected---one that requires ongoing communication
800: through sound and substrate vibration.
801:
802: The results in both bioacoustics and chemical ecology strongly suggest bark beetle
803: communication is largely multimodal and that both pheromone and mechanical signaling
804: are interwoven. A growing appreciation in many fields of biology has emerged that
805: animal signals often consist of multiple parts within or across sensory modalities. Insects
806: are not only an example of this observation, but they possess some of the most surprising
807: examples of multicomponent and multimodal communication systems \cite{Skal05a}. Sometimes these
808: different components or modalities signal different information and sometimes they are
809: redundant. For example, it was assumed that bee communication, through either the
810: famous ``waggle dance'' or associated sounds from wing vibrations, communicated
811: different informational content during display. More recently, experiments with robot
812: bees determined that these systems are largely redundant, most likely a strategy for
813: reducing transmission errors \cite{Mich99a}. Collectively, these observations reinforce the opinion
814: voiced many years ago by entomologist Philip Callahan (University of Florida) \cite{Call81a} that:
815: ``as long as sound is studied in one corner of the lab and scent in another, the mechanisms
816: of these sound-modulated scent molecules will not be understood ...''.
817:
818: \section{Conclusion: Closing the Loop}
819:
820: The eventual impact that insect-driven deforestation and global climate change will have
821: on the Earth's remaining forests ultimately depends on the rate at which temperatures
822: increase. The impacts will be minimized if that rate is gradual, but increasingly disruptive
823: if the change is abrupt. Unfortunately, most climate projections now show that a rapid
824: temperature increase is more likely \cite{Wats01a}. The current signs of increasing insect
825: populations at this early stage of warming does not portend well for forest health in the
826: near future. The concern is exacerbated, since we have limited countermeasures under
827: development.
828:
829: One conclusion appears certain. Extensive deforestation by insects will convert the
830: essential carbon pool provided by the Earth's forests into atmospheric carbon dioxide.
831: Concomitantly, the generation of atmospheric oxygen by trees will decrease. Most
832: immediately, though, as millions of trees die, they not only cease to participate in the
833: global carbon cycle, but become potential fuel for more frequent and increasingly
834: large-scale fire outbreaks. These fires will release further carbon dioxide into the
835: atmosphere and do so more rapidly than the natural cycle of biomass decay. The interaction
836: between these various components and the net effect is complicated at best---a theme that
837: runs through links in the entire feedback loop.
838:
839: An example of this is how boreal forest fires affect climate \cite{Rand06a}. A
840: constellation of substantially changed components (lost forest, sudden release of gases,
841: and the like) leads, it is claimed, to no net climate impact. The repeated lesson of
842: complex, nonlinear dynamical systems, though, is that the apparent stability of any part
843: can be destabilized by its place in a larger system. Thus, one needs to evaluate the lack of
844: boreal fire-climate effects in the context of the entire feedback loop.
845:
846: Taken alone, the potential loss of forests is of substantial concern to humans. When
847: viewing this system as a feedback loop, though, the concern is that the individual
848: components will become part of an accelerating positive feedback loop of sudden
849: climatic change. Such entomogenic change, given the adaptive population dynamics of a
850: key player (insects), may happen on a very short time scale. This necessitates a shift in
851: the current characterization of increasing insect populations as merely symptomatic of
852: global climate change to a concern for insects as a significant generative agent.
853:
854: While current research programs will continue to contribute important insights on
855: chemical communication and associated behavior of plant-eating insects, hard-won
856: experience suggests it is increasingly less plausible that the chemical ecology paradigm
857: alone will be the source for effective intervention strategies, as originally hoped. We
858: believe that alternative approaches will contribute fresh insights and suggest innovative
859: mechanisms for detection, monitoring, and control. Most importantly, we conclude from
860: the complexity of the constituents and interactions in the feedback loop that there must be
861: greater support for interdisciplinary approaches. At a minimum, the problem we
862: described requires a more comprehensive understanding of insect multimodal and
863: multicomponent communication and its rich ecological context. These then must be
864: evaluated in the larger frame of entomogenic climate change.
865:
866: In addition to concerted research in bioacoustics, micro-ecological symbiosis and
867: dynamics, and insect social organizations, these areas, in conjunction with the field of
868: chemical ecology, must be integrated into a broader view of multiscale population,
869: evolutionary, and climate dynamics. In this sense, the birth of chemical ecology serves as
870: an inspiration. It grew out of an interdisciplinary collaboration between biology and
871: chemistry. It is precisely this kind of intentional cooperation between disciplines---but
872: now over a greater range of scales---that will most likely lead to new strategies for
873: monitoring and defense against what seems to be a growing threat to the world's forests
874: and ultimately to humanity itself.
875:
876: \section*{Acknowledgments}
877:
878: The authors thank Dawn Sumner, Jim Tolisano, Richard Hofstetter, Jayne Yack,
879: Reagan McGuire, and Bob Harrill for helpful discussions. This work was partially
880: supported by the Art and Science Laboratory via a grant from the Delle Foundation
881: and the Network Dynamics Program, funded by Intel Corporation, at UCD and the
882: Santa Fe Institute.
883:
884: \bibliography{ref}
885:
886: \end{document}
887: