1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: % %
3: % A LaTeX file with some definitions at the top. %
4: % %
5: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
6: %
7: % MTU-PHY-HA-06/4
8: % Oct 24, 2006
9: % 1ST REVISION AS OF NOV> 16, 2006
10: \documentclass[12pt,draft,aps,prb,floats]{revtex4}
11: \usepackage[dvips]{epsfig}
12: \usepackage{graphicx} % standard LaTeX graphics tool
13: % for including eps-figure files
14: %OPTIONAL%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
15: %
16: %\usepackage{amstex} % useful for coding complex math
17: %\mathindent\parindent % needed in case "Amstex" is used
18: %
19: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
20:
21: %\voffset=1.8cm
22:
23: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
24:
25:
26: \newcommand{\inputps}[1]{\epsffile{#1}}
27: \newcommand{\inputpssize}[2]{\epsfxsize=#2\epsffile{#1}}
28:
29:
30: \begin{document}
31:
32: \title{\bf Short-time dynamics of polypeptides}
33:
34: \author{Everaldo Arashiro}
35: \affiliation{John v. Neumann Institute for Computing (NIC),
36: Forschungszentrum J{\"u}lich, 52425 J{\"u}lich, Germany}
37: \email{e.arashiro@fz-juelich.de}
38:
39: \author{J. R. Drugowich de Fel\'{\i}cio}
40: \affiliation{Departamento de F\'{\i}sica e Matem\'{a}tica,
41: FFCLRP Universidade de S\~{a}o Paulo, Avenida Bandeirantes 3900,
42: CEP 14040-901, Ribeir\~{a}o Preto, S\~ao Paulo, Brazil}
43: \email{drugo@usp.br}
44:
45: \author{Ulrich H.E. Hansmann}
46: \affiliation{John v. Neumann Institute for Computing (NIC),
47: Forschungszentrum J{\"u}lich, 52425 J{\"u}lich, Germany}
48: \affiliation{Department of Physics, Michigan Technological University,
49: Houghton, MI 49931-1291, USA}
50: \email{hansmann@mtu.edu, u.hansmann@fz-juelich.de}
51:
52:
53: \begin{abstract}
54: The authors study the short-time dynamics of helix-forming polypeptide chains
55: using an all-atom representation of the molecules and an implicit
56: solvation model to approximate the interaction with the surrounding
57: solvent. The results confirm earlier observations that the
58: helix-coil transition in proteins can be described by a set of
59: critical exponents. The high statistics of the simulations allows
60: the authors to determine the exponents values with increased
61: precision and support universality of the helix-coil transition in
62: homopolymers and (helical) proteins.
63: \end{abstract}
64: %
65: \pacs{64.60.Fr, 64.60.Ht, 02.70.uu, 75.10.Hk}
66: \date{\today}
67: \maketitle
68: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
69:
70: \section{INTRODUCTION}
71:
72: While energy landscape theory and funnel concept
73: \cite{Bryngelson87,Onuchic97} are powerful tool for describing the
74: general characteristics of folding, many details remain to be
75: solved. One example is the nature of the transitions between
76: different thermodynamic states that are observed during folding of
77: proteins. Their nature and role in the folding process are active
78: areas of research as many diseases are associated with spontaneous
79: or induced misfolding of proteins. In principle, these transitions
80: can be probed {\it in silico}. However, the energy landscape of
81: proteins is characterized by a rough energy landscape with a huge
82: number of local minima separated by high energy barriers.
83: Considerable effort has been put into the development of sampling
84: techniques that overcome the resulting slow convergence of computer
85: experiments \cite{H03a,Review1}. In generalized-ensemble
86: techniques \cite{Review2} such as parallel tempering \cite{PT}, the
87: broad-histogram method \cite{Oliveira} or multicanonical
88: sampling\cite{MU} , simulations are performed in an {\it artificial}
89: ensemble where the convergence to the equilibrium distribution is
90: fast. Thermodynamic quantities are then calculated through
91: re-weighting to the canonical (i.e., physical) ensemble. In
92: Ref.~\onlinecite{AHD06} we applied a complimentary approach to
93: protein science that leaves the ``physical" dynamics unchanged. The
94: underlying idea is to extract information on certain equilibrium
95: properties from the critical relaxation of regular canonical Monte
96: Carlo simulations (i.e., a non-equilibrium behavior of the system).
97:
98: Here, we revisit this approach and study with much improved
99: statistics the helix-coil transition in simple polypeptides. Since
100: it allows us to compare our results with earlier work,
101: we study in the present paper the nonequilibrium evolution process of
102: $(Ala)_N$ chains ($N=10, 20, 30 $ and $40$) in short-time Monte
103: Carlo (MC) simulations. Our investigation is later extended towards
104: the 34-residue human parathyroid fragment PTH(1-34). We evaluate
105: and compare for both systems the exponents that characterize the
106: observed helix-coil transition.
107:
108: \section{Methods}
109:
110: Janssen {\it et al.} \cite{Janssen1,Huse}
111: have shown that at criticality universality and scaling are already
112: present early in the evolution of systems.
113: A system, characterized by an order parameter $m$, decays at
114: a critical temperature $T = T_c$ from an initially ordered state $m_0=1$
115: (after a microscopic time $t_{mic}$) according to
116: a power-law \cite{Stauffer92,Stauffer93,Sch96} $m(t) \sim t^{-\beta / \nu z}$.
117: This relation is obtained from the more general scaling form:
118: \begin{equation}
119: m(t,\tau ,N)=
120: b^{-\beta /\nu } m (b^{-z}t, b^{1/\nu }\tau,b^{-1}N), \label{magk}
121: \end{equation}
122: where $b$ is an arbitrary chain size scaling factor
123: and $\tau $ is the reduced temperature, $\tau =(T-T_{c})/T_{c}$.
124: Differentiating $\ln m(t,\tau)$ with respect to the temperature $T$ at
125: $T=T_{c}$,
126: \begin{equation}
127: \left. {\displaystyle{\partial \ln m(t,\tau,L) \over \partial\tau}}
128: \right|_{\tau=0} \sim t^{1/\nu z} \, , \label{derivate}
129: \end{equation}
130: leads to a scaling relation that allows one to extract the exponent
131: \cite{Li96} $1/\nu z$ . Combining the two scaling relations allows
132: one further to eliminate the dynamic exponent $z$ and to calculate
133: the estimates of the critical exponent $\beta$. Additional
134: information on the system can be obtained from the scaling
135: \cite{Review} of the second cumulant
136: \begin{equation}
137: U_2(t,L)=\frac{m^2(t,L}{(m(t,L))^2} \sim t^{d/z}.
138: \label{second_moment}
139: \end{equation}
140: We use in the present paper Eq.~\ref{second_moment} in combination
141: with Eq.~\ref{derivate} to obtain estimates of the exponent
142: $d\nu$.
143:
144: %Persistence
145: Another dynamic critical exponent was proposed
146: by Majumdar et al. \cite{Majumdar1996}. The authors studied
147: global persistence probability P(t) which is defined as
148: \begin{equation}
149: P(t)=1-\sum_{t^{\prime }=1}^{t}\rho (t^{\prime }),
150: \end{equation}
151: where $\rho (t^{\prime })$ is the fraction of the samples where the
152: order parameter $m$ has changed its sign for the first time at the
153: instant $t^{\prime }$.
154: At criticality, P(t) is expected to decay algebraically as
155: \begin{equation}
156: P(t) \sim t^{-\theta _{g}} \label{Persistence}
157: \end{equation}
158: where $\theta _{g}$\ is the global persistence exponent. The study
159: of the persistence behavior have attracted enormous interest,
160: playing an important role in the study of systems far from
161: equilibrium\cite{Majumdar2003,Schulke1997,Hinrichsen1998,Zheng2002,daSilva2003,
162: HenriqueeArashiro,Henrique2006} .
163: %--------------------
164:
165: The question arises whether the above scaling laws apply also
166: to transitions in proteins and other biological
167: molecules for that - as finite systems - the concept of a phase transition
168: is not defined. For instance, the formation of $\alpha$-helices
169: in proteins resembles crystallization. The nature of this helix-coil transition
170: is a long-standing topic of research \cite{Scheraga1} and has been studied
171: with various methods including renormalization group techniques \cite{Scheraga2}.
172: A few years ago additional evidence was presented by one of us \cite{HO98c,AH98,AH00b}
173: that this helix-coil transition is for polyalanine
174: (a homopolymer where in principle one can define the limes of an infinite
175: chain) a true thermodynamic phase transition.
176: Because of these previous results we
177: decided to focus on helix-formation in order to study the
178: scaling behavior of short-time dynamics in proteins.
179:
180: We define our order parameter as the number of helical residues
181: $q_H = \max\left((2<n_H(T)>/(N-2) - 1), 0\right)$. Here we define a residue
182: as helical if its backbone dihedral angles $(\phi,\psi)$ take
183: values in the range \cite{OH95b} $(-70^{\circ}\pm
184: 30^{\circ},-37^{\circ}\pm30^{\circ})$ and the residue is hydrogen
185: bonded. The normalization factor $N -2$ is chosen instead of $N$,
186: the number of residues, because the flexible terminal residues are
187: usually not part of an $\alpha$-helix. Our definition ensures that $
188: 0\le q_H \le 1$ and $q_h (T_c) = 0$.
189:
190: Our short-time MC simulations of the helix-coil transition
191: are based on a detailed, all-atom representation of proteins.
192: The interaction between the atoms is
193: described by a standard force field, ECEPP/2 ({\bf E}mpirical
194: {\bf C}onformational {\bf E}nergy {\bf P}rogram for {\bf P}eptides,
195: version 2) \cite{EC} as implemented in the program package SMMP
196: ({\bf S}imple {\bf M}olecular {\bf M}echanics for {\bf P}roteins)
197: \cite{SMMP}:
198: \begin{eqnarray}
199: E_{ECEPP/2} & = & E_{C} + E_{LJ} + E_{HB} + E_{tor},\\
200: E_{C} & = & \sum_{(i,j)} \frac{332q_i q_j}{\varepsilon r_{ij}},\\
201: E_{LJ} & = & \sum_{(i,j)} \left( \frac{A_{ij}}{r^{12}_{ij}}
202: - \frac{B_{ij}}{r^6_{ij}} \right),\\
203: E_{HB} & = & \sum_{(i,j)} \left( \frac{C_{ij}}{r^{12}_{ij}}
204: - \frac{D_{ij}}{r^{10}_{ij}} \right),\\
205: E_{tor}& = & \sum_l U_l \left( 1 \pm \cos (n_l \chi_l ) \right).
206: \label{ECEPP/2}
207: \end{eqnarray}
208: Here, $r_{ij}$ (in \AA) is the distance between the atoms $i$ and $j$, and
209: $\chi_l$ is the $l$-th torsion angle.
210: The interactions between our polypeptides and water are approximated by
211: means of an implicit water model which assumes that the solvation
212: (free) energy is proportional to the solvent accessible surface area:
213: \begin{equation}
214: E_{solv}=\sum_i\sigma_i A_i,
215: \end{equation}
216: where $E_{solv}$ is the solvation energy, $A_i$ is the
217: solvent accessible area of the $i$-th atom,
218: and $\sigma_i$ is the corresponding solvation parameter.
219: We have chosen the parameter set of Ref. \onlinecite{OONS}
220: that is often used in conjunction with the ECEPP force field.
221:
222:
223: \section{Results and Discussion}
224: We start our investigation of the short time dynamics in the
225: helix-coil transition by simulating polyalanine chains of lengths
226: $N=10,20,30,$ and $40$. Our results are averaged over 4000
227: independent runs for $N=10,20,30$ and 2000 runs for $N=40$. Errors
228: are estimated by dividing these 4000 (2000) runs in bins of 100
229: (50) runs and calculating the fluctuation of the averages calculated
230: for each bin. Figure~1a displays for various temperatures the time
231: series of our order parameter $q_h$ as a function of Monte Carlo
232: time for Ala$_{10}$. Corresponding plots are displayed for
233: Ala$_{20}$ (Ala$_{30}$) in Fig.~1b (1c), and for Ala$_{40}$ in
234: Fig.~1d.
235:
236: We expect to see in such log-log plot that curves of $q_H$
237: corresponding to low temperatures approach a constant value, while
238: high-temperatures are characterized by an exponential decrease of
239: $n_H$. Both temperature regions are separated by the critical
240: temperature $T_c$ where the corresponding curve is a straight line
241: (in the scaling region). Our plots in Fig.~1 indicate for $N=10$ as
242: critical temperature
243: $T^{10}_c = 315$ K, $T^{20}_C = 415$ K for $=20$ , $T^{30}_c = 450$ K for
244: $N=30$ ; and one of $T^{40}_c= 470$ K for our longest chain, Ala$_{40}$.
245:
246: These estimates of the critical temperatures are lower than the
247: ones presented in Ref.~\onlinecite{PHA03}, where for $N=10$, $N=20$ and
248: $N=30$ the following temperatures were estimated from the position
249: of the maximum in the specific heat:
250: $T^{10}_c = 333(2)$ K, $T^{20}_c = 430(2)$ K and $T^{30}_c = 461(2)$ K.
251: Hence, for these chain sizes the estimates obtained from a
252: short-time analysis seem to be lower by $\approx 15$ K than the ones
253: estimated from the peak in specific heat. This does not indicate
254: that one of the two sets is wrong. Even in spin systems the estimate
255: of the critical temperature derived from the peak in the specific
256: heat usually differs for small system size from the one obtained
257: from the change in magnetization. Only for large system size both
258: values converge. However, we remark that our values are calculated
259: over a set of 4000 (2000 for $N=40$) {\it independent} runs while
260: the results of multicanonical runs in Ref.~\onlinecite{PHA03}
261: contain only of order $\approx 10$ independent events.
262:
263:
264: Note that the scaling relation
265: leads to similar results for all chain lengths. This can be seen in Fig.~2
266: which displays for $T=T_c$ the time series of the order parameter as a
267: function of time for all four chain lengths. We focus here on the linear
268: range and show both the measured data points and the straight line that
269: best fits these data. The data for the different chain sizes
270: are almost parallel to each other and therefore differ little in their slope.
271: From the slope of these plots we can obtain an estimate of $\beta/\nu z$.
272:
273: Measuring in addition the slope for slightly higher (lower)
274: temperatures and calculating the numerical derivative leads in
275: addition to an estimate for $1/\nu z$. In Fig.~3, the power law
276: increase of Eq. (2) is plotted in double-log scales for the for
277: polyalanine chains. Estimates of the ratio $d/z$ can be extracted
278: from the scaling of $U_2(t,L)$ which is shown for the four
279: polyalanine chains in Fig.~4. Table 1 lists the values of all
280: three ratios $\beta/\nu z$, $1/\nu z$ and $d/z$, together with the
281: exponents $\beta$ and $d\nu$ that can be extracted from them.
282:
283: In order to
284: estimate the exponent $\theta_g$ one needs to prepare the initial states
285: carefully to obtain precise values of the initial $q_h^0 = q_h (t=0)$. The
286: exponent $\theta_g$ is obtained from Eq. ~\ref{Persistence}.
287: Fig.~5 shows the corresponding log-log plots of $P(t)$
288: for {\it Ala}$_{40}$ and various initial values of $q_h^0$. From
289: these curves one extracts in the limes $N \rightarrow \infty$ and
290: $q_h^0 \rightarrow 0$ an
291: estimate for the persistence exponent $\theta_g =0.73(1)$.
292: The corresponding values for polyalanine chains
293: of length $N=10,20,30$ and $N=40$, and for the polypeptide PTH(1-34),
294: are also listed in table 1.
295:
296:
297: Our values for the critical exponent $\beta \approx 0.39$ in table 1
298: clearly excludes $\beta = 0$, the value expected for a first order
299: transition. A similar statement holds for $d\nu \approx 1.4$ that
300: also excludes a first-order transition ($d\nu = 1$). This is different
301: from the case of polyalanine in
302: gas phase where the helix-coil transition is of first-order type\cite{AH98}.
303:
304: The estimates listed in table 1 indicate that the
305: finite size effects are less than the statistical errors and
306: that reliable estimators for
307: critical exponents can already be obtained on very small chains.
308: This suggests that short-time analysis can also be applied to proteins
309: where an extrapolation to infinite chain
310: length is not possible. Here, short-time analysis opens a way to
311: characterize thermodynamic processes in proteins by defining
312: analogues to phase transitions.
313:
314: We have checked this assumption for the peptide fragment PTH(1-34)
315: corresponding to residues 1-34 of human parathyroid
316: hormone \cite{Klaus,Crystal,MABFR}. This fragment is sufficient for the
317: biological activities of the hormone suggesting medical and
318: pharmaceutical applications of the peptide. The structure of PTH(1-34) has
319: been resolved both crystallized \cite{Crystal} and in solution \cite{MABFR}
320: and is at room temperature almost completely helical.
321: In previous work \cite{H03} using the same energy function it was shown
322: that PTH(1-34) exhibits at $T=560(10)$ K a sharp transition between a
323: high temperature region where disordered coil structures prevail, and a
324: low-temperature region that is characterized by mostly helical structures.
325: The nature of this helix-coil transition could not be established in
326: Ref.~\onlinecite{H03}.
327:
328:
329: Observing the short-time dynamics of 500 runs for the helix-coil
330: transition in PTH(1-34) we obtained data for temperatures
331: $T=520,530,540,545,550$ and $560$ K. Fig.~6 displays our order
332: parameter for various temperatures as a function of Monte Carlo
333: time. From the plot we estimate that the critical temperature is
334: $T=545(5)$ K, a value that is again slightly smaller than the
335: obtained from the peak in specific heat. The scaling region is shown
336: for this temperature in Fig. 7, with both the data point and the
337: best straight-line fit through them.
338:
339: Note that our estimate of the critical temperature differs slightly
340: from the one ($T=540$ K) reported in Ref.~ \onlinecite{AHD06}. The
341: slightly lower value that was obtained in this preliminary work with
342: much lower statistics led to critical exponents different from the
343: ones for polyalanine. Our new data indicate however that the
344: critical exponents (listed also in table 1) are the same for the
345: polyalanine chains and the polypeptide PTH(1-34). This is an
346: interesting result as it indicates that the order of the helix-coil
347: transition does not depend on the side chains of the residues in a
348: protein. On one hand we have (poly)alanine with its extrem short
349: side chain, on the other PTH(1-34) where the side chains differ for
350: each residue and therefore side chain ordering is much more
351: difficult to obtain than in a homopolymer. Hence, our new results
352: suggest ``universality'' of the helix-coil transition in
353: homopolymers and (helical) proteins.
354:
355: \section{Summary and Conclusion}
356: We have investigated the short-time dynamics of helix-forming polypeptides
357: with up to $N=40$ residues. At their critical temperature the evolution of these
358: molecules can be described by scaling laws that allow on to extract various
359: critical exponents that characterize the helix-coil transition in these
360: molecules. Our results indicate ``universality'' of the helix-coil transition in
361: protein-like molecules. They also demonstrate that the analysis of short-time
362: dynamics is a valuable tool for the investigation of transitions in proteins that
363: may lead to a deeper understanding of their folding mechanism.
364:
365:
366:
367: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
368:
369: \section{Acknowledgment}
370:
371: E. Arashiro and J. R. Drugowich de Fel\'{\i}cio acknowledge support
372: by Capes and CNPq (Brazil), and U.H.E Hansmann by a research grant
373: from the National Science Foundation (CHE-0313618).
374:
375: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
376: \newpage
377: %\begin{thebibliography}
378: \begin{references}
379: \bibitem{Bryngelson87} J.D.~Bryngelson and P.G.~Wolynes,
380: Proc.~Natl.~Acad.~Sci.~(USA) {\bf 84},
381: 7524 (1987).
382: \bibitem{Onuchic97} J.N.~Onuchic, Z.~Luhey-Schulten and P.G.~Wolynes,
383: Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. {\bf 48}, 545 (1997).
384:
385: \bibitem{H03a} U.H.E.~Hansmann, Comp. Sci. Eng. {\bf 5}, 64 (2003).
386: \bibitem{Review1}U.H.E.~Hansmann and Y.~Okamoto,
387: Curr.~Opin.~Struc.~Biol. {\bf 9}, 177 (1999).
388: \bibitem{Review2}U.H.E. Hansmann and Y. Okamoto, in \emph{Annual Reviews in Computational Physics
389: VI}, edited by D. Stauffer (World Scientific, Singapore, 1999), p.129.
390:
391: \bibitem{PT} K.~Hukushima and K.~Nemoto, J.~Phys.~Soc.~(Jpn.)
392: {\bf 65}, 1604 (1996);
393: G.J.~Geyer, Stat.~Sci. {\bf 7}, 437 (1992).
394: \bibitem{Oliveira} P.M.C. de Oliveira,T.J.P. Penna and H.J. Herrmann,
395: Braz. J. Phys. {\bf 26}, 677 (1996); P.M.C. de Oliveira,
396: Int. J. Mod. Phys. C {\bf 9}, 497 (1998).
397: \bibitem{MU} B.A. Berg and T. Neuhaus,
398: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 267}, 249 (1991).
399: \bibitem{AHD06} E. Arashiro, J. R. Drugowich de Fel\'{\i}cio and U.H.E. Hansmann,
400: Phys. Rev. E {\bf 73}, 040902(R) (2006).
401:
402: \bibitem{Janssen1} H. K. Janssen, B. Schaub and B. Schmittmann,
403: Z. Phys. B {\bf 73}, 539 (1989).
404: \bibitem{Huse} D. A. Huse, Phys. Rev. B {\bf 40}, 304 (1989).
405: \bibitem{Stauffer92} D. Stauffer, Physica A {\bf 186}, 197 (1992).
406: \bibitem{Stauffer93} C. M\"{u}nkel, D.W. Heermann, J. Adler,
407: M. Gofman and D. Stauffer, Physica A {\bf 193}, 540 (1993).
408: \bibitem{Sch96} L. Sch\"{u}lke, B. Zheng,
409: Phys. Lett. A {\bf 215}, 81 (1996).
410: \bibitem{Li96} Z. B. Li, L. Sch\"{u}lke, B. Zheng,
411: Phys. Rev. E {\bf 53}, 2940 (1996).
412: \bibitem{Review} B. Zheng, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B {\bf 12}, 1419 (1998).
413: \bibitem{Majumdar1996} S. N. Majumdar, A. J. Bray, S. J. Cornell and C.
414: Sire, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 77} 3704 (1996).
415:
416: \bibitem{Majumdar2003} S. N. Majumdar and A. J. Bray, Phys. Rev. Lett.
417: \textbf{91}, 030602 (2003).
418:
419: \bibitem{Schulke1997} L. Schulke and B. Zheng, Phys. Lett. A {\bf 233},
420: 93 (1997).
421:
422: \bibitem{Hinrichsen1998} H. Hinrichsen and H. M. Koduvely, Eur. Phys. J. B
423: \textbf{5}, 257 (1998).
424:
425: \bibitem{Zheng2002} B. Zheng, Mod. Phys. Lett. B {\bf 16}, 775 (2002).
426:
427: \bibitem{daSilva2003}R. da Silva, N. A. Alves and J. R. Drugowich de
428: Fel\'{\i}cio, Phys. Rev. E {\bf 67}, 057102 (2003).
429:
430: \bibitem{HenriqueeArashiro} H. A. Fernandes, E. Arashiro, J. R. Drugowich
431: de Fel\'{\i}cio, A. A. Caparica, Physica A {\bf 366},
432: 255 (2006); E. Arashiro, H. A. Fernandes and J. R. Drugowich
433: de Fel\'{\i}cio, cond-mat/0603436.
434:
435: \bibitem{Henrique2006} H. A. Fernandes, J. R. Drugowich de Fel\'{\i}cio,
436: Phys. Rev. E {\bf 73}, 057101 (2006).
437: \bibitem{Scheraga1} D. Poland and H.A. Scheraga, J. Chem. Phys. {\bf 45}, 1456 (1966).
438: \bibitem{Scheraga2} Z. Li and H.A. Scheraga, J. Phys. Chem. {\bf 88}, 6580 (1984).
439: \bibitem{HO98c} U.H.E.~Hansmann and Y.~Okamoto, {J. Chem.~Phys.} {\bf 110},
440: 1267 (1999); {\bf 111} 1339(E) (1999).
441: \bibitem{AH98} N.A. Alves and U.H.E. Hansmann,\
442: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 84}, 1836 (2000).
443: \bibitem{AH00b} N.A. Alves and U.H.E.~Hansmann, Physica A
444: {\bf 292}, 509 (2001).
445: \bibitem{OH95b} Y.~Okamoto and U.H.E.~Hansmann,\ J.~Phys.~Chem.
446: {\bf 99}, 11276 (1995).
447: \bibitem{EC} M.J. Sippl, G. N{\'e}methy, and H.A. Scheraga,
448: J. Phys. Chem. {\bf 88}, 6231 (1984),
449: and references therein.
450: \bibitem{SMMP} F. Eisenmenger, U.H.E. Hansmann, Sh. Hayryan, C.-K. Hu,
451: Comp. Phys. Comm. {\bf 138}, 192 (2001).
452: \bibitem{OONS} T. Ooi, M. Obatake, G. Nemethy, H.A. Scheraga,
453: Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA {\bf 8}, 3086 (1987).
454: \bibitem{PHA03} Y. Peng, U.H.E. Hansmann and N.A. Alves,
455: J. Chem. Phys., {\bf 118}, 2374 (2003).
456: \bibitem{Klaus} W. Klaus, T. Dieckmann, V. Wray, D. Schomburg,
457: E. Wingender and H. Mayer,
458: Biochemistry {\bf 30}, 6936 (1991).
459: \bibitem{Crystal} L. Jin, S.L. Briggs, S. Chandrasekhar, N.Y. Chirgadze,
460: D.K. Clawson, R.W. Schevitz, D.L. Smiley, A.H. Tashjian,
461: F. Zhang, J. Biol. Chem. {\bf 275}, 27238 (2000).
462: \bibitem{MABFR} U.C. Marx, K. Adermann, P. Bayer, W.-G. Forssmann and
463: P. R{\"o}sch,
464: Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. {\bf 267}, 213 (2000).
465: \bibitem{H03} U.H.E. Hansmann, J. Chem. Phys. {\bf 120}, 417 (2004).
466:
467:
468: \end{references}
469: %\end{thebibliography}
470:
471:
472:
473: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
474:
475: \newpage \cleardoublepage
476:
477: \noindent
478: {\Large Tables}\\
479: \begin{table}[h]
480: \begin{tabular}{c|c|c|c|c|c|c}
481: \hline
482: $N$ & $\beta/\nu z$ & $ 1/\nu z $ & $d/z$ & $\beta$ & $d\nu$ & $\theta_g$\\
483: \hline
484: 10 & 0.303(3) & 0.772(7) & 1.099(8) & 0.392(7) & 1.42(3) & 0.402(6)\\
485: 20 & 0.304(3) & 0.782(9) & 1.100(9) & 0.389(8) & 1.40(3) & 0.687(7)\\
486: 30 & 0.301(5) & 0.779(9) & 1.09(1) & 0.39(1) & 1.40(3) & 0.708(7)\\
487: 40 & 0.299(5) & 0.78(1) & 1.09(1) & 0.38(1) & 1.42(4) & 0.710(8)\\
488: \hline
489: PTH & 0.290(5) & 0. 768(8) & 1.09(1) & 0.38(1) & 1.42(3) & 0.705(6)\\
490: \hline
491: \end{tabular}
492: \caption{Exponents as obtained for polyalanine chains of length
493: $N=10,20$ and $40$ from the scaling relations of
494: Eqs.~\ref{magk}, \ref{derivate}, \ref{second_moment} and \ref{Persistence}.
495: The columns 5 and 6 list the critical exponents $\beta$ and
496: $d\nu$ as calculated from these quantities. The last
497: row summarize the results for the polypeptide PTH(1-34).}
498:
499: \end{table}
500:
501:
502: \newpage
503: \noindent
504: {\Large Figures}\\
505: \begin{description}
506: \item [Fig.~1] Log-log plot of the time series of the helical order parameter $q_H$
507: (defined in the text) as a function of Monte Carlo time for
508: polyalanine chains of length (a) $N=10$, (b) $N=20$, (c) $N=30$;
509: and (d) $N=40$.
510: \item [Fig.~2] Log-log plot of the time series of the helical order parameter $q_H$
511: as a function of Monte Carlo time for polyalanine chains of length
512: $N=10,20,30$ and $40$ as measured at their respective critical
513: temperatures. Shown are the data in the scaling region
514: and the best fit through them.
515: \item [Fig.~3] Log-log plot of the time series of the logarithmic derivative of
516: the order parameter (Eq.\ \ref{derivate})
517: as a function of Monte Carlo time for polyalanine chains of length
518: $N=10,20,30$ and $40$, and for the polypeptide PTH(1-34).
519: \item [Fig.~4] Log-log plot of the time series of the second moment $U_2(t,L)$
520: as a function of Monte Carlo time for polyalanine chains of length
521: $N=10,20,30$ and $40$ and the polypeptide PTH(1-34) as measured
522: at their respective critical temperatures. Shown are the data in the scaling region
523: and the best fit through them.
524: \item [Fig.~5] Log-log plot of the time series of the global persistency $P(t)$
525: (defined in the text) for {\it Ala}$_{40}$ and various initial
526: order parameter values $q_h^0$.
527: \item [Fig.~6] Log-log plot of the time series of the helical order parameter $q_H$
528: as a function of Monte Carlo time for the polypeptide PTH(1-34)
529: measured at temperatures $T =520,530,540,545,550$ and $560$ K.
530: \item [Fig.~7] Log-log plot of the time series of the helical order parameter $q_H$
531: as a function of Monte Carlo time for the polypeptide PTH(1-34)
532: at the critical temperature $T_c = 545$
533: in the scaling region, with the best fit also drawn through them.
534: \end{description}
535:
536:
537: \end{document}
538: