q-bio0702050/gmi.bbl
1: \def\cprime{$'$}
2: \begin{thebibliography}{10}
3: \expandafter\ifx\csname url\endcsname\relax
4:   \def\url#1{\texttt{#1}}\fi
5: \expandafter\ifx\csname urlprefix\endcsname\relax\def\urlprefix{URL }\fi
6: 
7: \bibitem{Bun}
8: P.~Buneman, The recovery of trees from measures of dissimilarity, in:
9:   Mathematics in the Archeological and Historical Sciences, Edinburgh
10:   University Press, Edinburgh, 1971, pp. 387--395.
11: 
12: \bibitem{S94}
13: M.~Steel, Recovering a tree from the leaf colourations it generates under a
14:   {M}arkov model, Appl. Math. Letters 7~(2) (1994) 19--23.
15: 
16: \bibitem{MR97k:92011}
17: J.~T. Chang, Full reconstruction of {M}arkov models on evolutionary trees:
18:   identifiability and consistency, Math. Biosci. 137~(1) (1996) 51--73.
19: 
20: \bibitem{GuLi96}
21: X.~Gu, Wen-Hsiung-Li, A general additive distance with time-reversibility and
22:   rate variation among sites, P.N.A.S. 93 (1996) 4671--4676.
23: 
24: \bibitem{WadSt97}
25: P.~J. Waddell, M.~Steel, General time-reversible distances with unequal rates
26:   across sites: Mixing ${\Gamma}$ and inverse {G}aussian distributions with
27:   invariant sites, Mol. Phylo. Evol. 8~(3) (1997) 398--414.
28: 
29: \bibitem{Rog01}
30: J.~S. Rogers, Maximum likelihood estimation of phylogenetic trees is consistent
31:   when substitution rates vary according to the invariable sites plus gamma
32:   distribution, Syst. Biol. 50~(5) (2001) 713--722.
33: 
34: \bibitem{AnePC}
35: C.~An{\'e}, personal communication (2005).
36: 
37: \bibitem{ARidtree}
38: E.~S. Allman, J.~A. Rhodes, {The identifiability of tree topology for
39:   phylogenetic models, including covarion and mixture models}, J. Comput. Biol.
40:   13~(5) (2006) 1101--1113, {\tt arXiv:q-bio.PE/0511009}.
41: 
42: \bibitem{MR1604518}
43: C.~Tuffley, M.~Steel, Modeling the covarion hypothesis of nucleotide
44:   substitution, Math. Biosci. 147~(1) (1998) 63--91.
45: 
46: \bibitem{MR1664261}
47: E.~Baake, What can and what cannot be inferred from pairwise sequence
48:   comparisons?, Math. Biosci. 154~(1) (1998) 1--21.
49: 
50: \bibitem{SHL00}
51: M.~Steel, D.~Huson, P.~J. Lockhart, Invariable sites models and their uses in
52:   phylogeny reconstruction, Syst. Biol. 49~(2) (2000) 225--232.
53: 
54: \bibitem{splitsTree4}
55: D.~H. Huson, D.~Bryant, Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary
56:   studies, Mol. Biol. Evol. 23~(2) (2006) 254--267, {\tt
57:   http://www.splitstree.org}.
58: 
59: \bibitem{SSH94}
60: M.~Steel, L.~Sz\'ekely, M.~Hendy, Reconstructing trees from sequences whose
61:   sites evolve at variable rates, J. Comput. Biol. 1~(2) (1994) 153--163.
62: 
63: \bibitem{AR03}
64: E.~S. Allman, J.~A. Rhodes, Phylogenetic invariants for the general {M}arkov
65:   model of sequence mutation, Math. Biosci. 186 (2003) 113--144.
66: 
67: \bibitem{ARgm}
68: E.~S. Allman, J.~A. Rhodes, Phylogenetic ideals and varieties for the general
69:   {M}arkov model, Adv. in Appl. Math., in press, {\tt arXiv:math.AG/0410604}.
70: 
71: \bibitem{CF87}
72: J.~A. Cavender, J.~Felsenstein, Invariants of phylogenies in a simple case with
73:   discrete states, J. of Class. 4 (1987) 57--71.
74: 
75: \bibitem{Lake87}
76: J.~Lake, A rate independent technique for analysis of nucleic acid sequences:
77:   Evolutionary parsimony, Mol. Bio. Evol. 4~(2) (1987) 167--191.
78: 
79: \bibitem{ARnme}
80: E.~S. Allman, J.~A. Rhodes, Phylogenetic invariants, in: O.~Gascuel, M.~Steel
81:   (Eds.), New Mathematical Models of Evolution, 2006, pp. 1--38, preprint, to
82:   appear, Oxford University Press.
83: 
84: \bibitem{MR2001c:92009}
85: T.~R. Hagedorn, Determining the number and structure of phylogenetic
86:   invariants, Adv. in Appl. Math. 24~(1) (2000) 1--21.
87: 
88: \bibitem{sing}
89: G.-M. Greuel, G.~Pfister, H.~Sch\"onemann, {\sc Singular} 3.0, {A Computer
90:   Algebra System for Polynomial Computations}, Centre for Computer Algebra,
91:   University of Kaiserslautern, {\tt http://www.singular.uni-kl.de} (2005).
92: 
93: \end{thebibliography}
94: