1: \documentclass{amsart}
2: \usepackage{amsmath}
3: \usepackage{amssymb}
4: \input epsf
5: \textheight 22cm
6: \textwidth 15cm
7: \oddsidemargin 0cm
8: \evensidemargin 0cm
9: \newcommand{\si}[1]{\sigma_{#1}}
10: \newcommand{\sa}[2]{\sigma_{#1}^{#2}}
11: \newcommand{\ip}[2]{\langle \,{#1},\,{#2}\,\rangle}
12: \newcommand{\ro}{\rho}
13: \newcommand{\la}{\lambda}
14: \newcommand{\al}{\alpha}
15: \newcommand{\be}{\beta}
16: \newcommand{\g}{\gamma_{0}}
17: \newcommand{\ga}{\gamma}
18: \newcommand{\tet[1]}{\theta_{#1}}
19: \newcommand{\re}{\mathrm{Re}\,}
20: \newcommand{\I}{\mathbb I}
21: \newcommand{\ket}[1]{|{#1}\rangle}
22: \newcommand{\bra}[1]{\langle {#1} |}
23: \newcommand{\cH}{{\mathcal H}}
24: \newcommand{\C}{\mathbb C}
25: \newcommand{\R}{\mathbb R}
26: \newcommand{\fA}{\mathfrak A}
27: \newcommand{\fE}{\mathcal E}
28: \newcommand{\tr}{\mathrm{tr}\,}
29: \newcommand{\ptr}[1]{\mathrm{tr}_{#1}}
30: \newcommand{\tl}[1]{\boldsymbol #1}
31: \newcommand{\mr}[1]{\mathrm{#1}}
32: %\newcommand{\begin{equation}}{\begin{equation}}
33: %\newcommand{\end{equation}}{\end{equation}}
34: \newcommand{\DS}{\displaystyle}
35: \newtheorem{tw}{Theorem}[section]
36: \newtheorem{prop}{Proposition}[section]
37: \newtheorem{wn}{Conclusion}[section]
38: \newtheorem{df}{Definition}[section]
39: \newtheorem{uwaga}{Remark}[section]
40: \begin{document}
41: \begin{center}
42: \begin{LARGE}
43: \textbf{Entanglement and nonlocality versus spontaneous emission\\[6mm]
44: in two -- atom system}
45: \end{LARGE}\\[12mm]
46: L. Jak{\'o}bczyk and A. Jamr{\'o}z\\[2mm]
47: Institute of Theoretical Physics\\ University of
48: Wroc{\l}aw\\
49: Pl. M. Borna 9, 50-204 Wroc{\l}aw, Poland
50: \end{center}
51: \vskip 12mm
52: \noindent
53: {\sc Abstract}: We study evolution of entanglement of two
54: two-level atoms in the presence of dissipation caused by
55: spontaneous emission. We find explicit formulas for the amount of
56: entanglement as a function of time, in the case of destruction of the initial entanglement
57: and possible creation of a transient entanglement between atoms. We also discuss
58: how spontaneous emission influences nonlocality of states
59: expressed by violation of Bell - CHSH inequality. It is shown that
60: evolving system very quickly becomes local, even if entanglement
61: is still present or produced.
62: \section{Introduction}
63: The process of spontaneous emission by a system of two - level
64: atoms was extensively studied by several authors
65: (see e.g. \cite{Dicke,dill,lemb1,lemb2}). In particular, in the case of
66: spontaneous emission by two trapped atoms separated by a distance
67: small compared to the radiation wavelength, where is a
68: substantial probability that a photon emitted by one atom will be
69: absorbed by the other, there are states of the system in which
70: photon exchange can enhance or diminish spontaneous decay rates.
71: The states with enhanced decay rate are called superradiant and
72: analogously states with diminished decay rate are called
73: subradiant \cite{Dicke}. It was also shown by Dicke, that the
74: system of two coupled two-level atoms can be treated as a single
75: four-level system with modified decay rates.
76: \par
77: Another aspects of the model of the spontaneous emission
78: are studied in the present paper.
79: When the compound system of two atoms is in an entangled state,
80: the irreversible process of radiative decay usually destroys
81: correlations and the state becomes unentangled. In the model
82: studied here, the photon exchange produces correlations between
83: atoms which can partially overcome decoherence caused by
84: spontaneous radiation. As a result, some amount of entanglement
85: can survive, and moreover there is a possibility that this
86: process can entangle separable states of two atoms. The idea that
87: dissipation can create entanglement in physical
88: systems, was recently developed in several papers
89: \cite{plenio,kim,milb,kni}. In particular, the effect of
90: spontaneous emission on destruction and production of entanglement
91: in two - atom system was discussed \cite{J,FT3,FT2}. Possible
92: production of robust entanglement for closely separated atoms was shown
93: in Ref. \cite{J}, and the existence of transient entanglement
94: induced by this process in a system of
95: two atoms separated by an arbitrary distance was also studied
96: \cite{FT3,FT2}.
97: \par
98: In this paper we also concentrate on arbitrarily separated atoms
99: and consider the dynamics of entanglement. Similarly as in
100: \cite{FT2} we take some class of initial states, including
101: interesting pure and mixed states, and discuss in details its time
102: evolution as well as the evolution of its entanglement. Note that
103: our initial states are different from that considered in Ref.
104: \cite{FT2}. We study also the interesting problem how dissipative
105: process of spontaneous emission influences nonlocal properties of
106: initial states. Nonlocality of quantum theory manifets by
107: violation of Bell inequalities, and in the case of two two-level
108: systems it can be quantified by some numerical parameter ranging
109: from $0$ for local states to $1$ for states maximally violating
110: some Bell inequality. Atomic dynamics studied in the paper
111: enables also to consider time evolution of this parameter.
112: \par
113: The model considered in the present paper consist of two two-level
114: atoms coupled to a common thermostat at zero temperature and the
115: reduced dynamics (in the Markovian approximation) is given by the
116: semi-group $\{ T_{t} \}_{t\geq 0}$ of completely positive linear
117: mappings acting on density matrices (see e.g. \cite{Alicki}). The
118: dynamics takes into account only spontaneous emission and possible
119: photon exchange between atoms \cite{Agar,FT1}, and the generator
120: $L_{D}$ of $\{ T_{t} \}_{t\geq 0}$ is parametrized in terms of the
121: spontaneous emission rate of the single atom $\g$ and the photon
122: exchange rate $\ga$. In the case of atoms separated by an
123: arbitrary distance $R$, $\ga$ is strictly smaller then $\g$ and
124: one can check that the relaxation process brings all initial
125: states into the unique asymptotic state when both the atoms are
126: in their ground states. In contrast to the small separation
127: regime ($\ga=\g$) studied in Ref. \cite{J}, where the robust
128: entanglement of non-trivial asymptotic states can be analysed, in
129: the present case only the transient entanglement of some states
130: can exist. To consider transient entanglement we need to know in
131: details time evolution of initial states, not only its asymptotic
132: behaviour, so the analysis of possible generation of entanglement
133: is much more involved.
134: \par
135: In this paper we calculate time evolution of an arbitrary
136: initial density matrix. To obtain an analytic expression for
137: entanglement
138: as a function of time, we concentrate on the class of states
139: which is left invariant during the evolution, and admits
140: explicite formula for the measure of entanglement. Next we discuss
141: in details how evolve pure initial states, both unentangled and
142: entangled. We show that entanglement as a function of time can
143: behave very differently depending on initial conditions: it may
144: monotonically decrease to zero, increase to maximal value and
145: then decrease to zero or even it can have local minimum and
146: maximum. In particular, there are states for which induced
147: transient entanglement is larger then initial entanglement. Our
148: solution enables also to study nonlocality of the evolving
149: system of two atoms. It turns out that the natural measure of
150: nonlocality very quickly becomes equal to zero, even if
151: entanglement is increasing in some time interval.
152: \newpage
153: \noindent
154: \section{Entanglement and Nonlocality for a Pair of Two-Level
155: Atoms}
156: \subsection{Measure of entanglement}
157: \noindent
158: Consider two-level atom $A$ with ground state $\ket{0}$
159: and excited state $\ket{1}$. This quantum system can be described
160: in terms of the Hilbert space $\cH_{A}=\C^{2}$ and the algebra
161: $\fA_{A}$ of $2\times 2$ complex matrices. If we identify
162: $\ket{1}$ and $\ket{0}$ with vectors $\bigl( \begin{smallmatrix}
163: 1\\0
164: \end{smallmatrix}\bigr)$ and $\bigl( \begin{smallmatrix} 0 \\ 1
165: \end{smallmatrix}\bigr)$ respectively, then the raising and
166: lowering operators $\si{+},\;\si{-}$ defined by
167: \begin{equation}
168: \si{+}=\ket{1}\bra{0},\quad \si{-}=\ket{0}\bra{1}
169: \end{equation}
170: can be
171: expressed in terms of Pauli matrices $\si{1},\; \si{2}$
172: \begin{equation}
173: \si{+}=\frac{1}{2}\,(\si{1}+i\,\si{2}),\quad
174: \si{-}=\frac{1}{2}\,(\si{1}-i\,\si{2})
175: \end{equation}
176: For a joint system $AB$
177: of two two-level atoms $A$ and $B$, the algebra $\fA_{AB}$ is
178: equal to $4\times 4$ complex matrices and the Hilbert space
179: $\cH_{AB}=\cH_{A}\otimes \cH_{B}=\C^{4}$. Let $\fE_{AB}$ be the
180: set of all states of the compound system i.e.
181: \begin{equation} \fE_{AB}=\{
182: \ro\in \fA_{AB}\, : \, \ro\geq 0\quad\text{and}\quad\tr \ro =1 \}
183: \end{equation}
184: The state $\ro\in \fE_{AB}$ is \textit{separable}
185: \cite{Werner}, if it has the form
186: \begin{equation}
187: \ro=\sum\limits_{k}\la_{k}\ro_{k}^{A}\otimes \ro_{k}^{B},\quad
188: \ro_{k}^{A}\in \fE_{A},\;\ro_{k}^{B}\in \fE_{B},\; \la_{k}\geq
189: 0\quad\text{and}\quad \sum\limits_{k}\la_{k}=1
190: \end{equation}
191: The set
192: $\fE_{AB}^{\,\rm sep}$ of all separable states forms a convex
193: subset of $\fE_{AB}$. When $\ro$ is not separable, it is called
194: \textit{inseparable} or \textit{entangled}. Thus
195: \begin{equation}
196: \fE_{AB}^{\,\rm ent}=\fE_{AB}\setminus \fE_{AB}^{\,\rm sep}
197: \end{equation}
198: As a measure of the amount of entanglement a given state contains
199: we take the entanglement of formation \cite{Bennett}
200: \begin{equation}
201: E(\ro)=\min \, \sum\limits_{k}\la_{k}E(P_{k})
202: \end{equation}
203: where the minimum is taken over all possible decompositions
204: \begin{equation}
205: \ro=\sum\limits_{k}\la_{k}P_{k}
206: \end{equation}
207: and
208: \begin{equation}
209: E(P)=-\tr[ (\ptr{A}P)\,\log_{2}\, (\ptr{A}P)]
210: \end{equation}
211: In the case of two two-level atoms, $E(\ro)$ is the function of another useful
212: quantity $C(\ro)$ called \textit{concurrence}, which also can be
213: taken as a measure of entanglement \cite{HW, W}. Now we pass to
214: the definition of $C(\ro)$. Let
215: \begin{equation}
216: \ro^{\dag}=(\si{2}\otimes
217: \si{2})\,\overline{\ro}\,(\si{2}\otimes \si{2})
218: \end{equation}
219: where
220: $\overline{\ro}$ is the complex conjugation of the matrix $\ro$.
221: Define also
222: \begin{equation}
223: \widehat{\ro}=(\ro^{1/2}\ro^{\dag}\ro^{1/2})^{1/2}
224: \end{equation}
225: Then the
226: concurrence $C(\ro)$ is given by \cite{HW,W}
227: \begin{equation} C(\ro)=\max\;
228: (\,0, 2p_{\mathrm{max}}(\widehat{\ro})-\tr \widehat{\ro}\,)
229: \end{equation}
230: where $p_{\mathrm{max}}(\widehat{\ro})$ denotes the maximal
231: eigenvalue of $\widehat{\ro}$. The value of the number $C(\ro)$
232: varies from $0$ for separable states, to $1$ for maximally
233: entangled pure states.
234: \par
235: Consider now the class of density matrices $\ro$
236: \begin{equation}
237: \ro=\begin{pmatrix}
238: 0&0&0&0\\
239: 0&\ro_{22}&\ro_{23}&\ro_{24}\\
240: 0&\ro_{32}&\ro_{33}&\ro_{34}\\
241: 0&\ro_{42}&\ro_{43}&\ro_{44}
242: \end{pmatrix}
243: \end{equation}
244: where the matrix elements are taken with
245: respect to the basis $\ket{1}\otimes\ket{1},\,
246: \ket{1}\otimes\ket{0},\,\ket{0}\otimes\ket{1}$ and
247: $\ket{0}\otimes\ket{0}$. One can check that for density matrices
248: of the form (12)
249: \begin{equation}
250: C(\ro)=|\ro_{23}|-\sqrt{\ro_{22}\ro_{33}}-|\,|\ro_{23}|-\sqrt{\ro_{22}\ro_{33}}\,|
251: \end{equation}
252: By positive-definiteness of $\ro$, $|\ro_{23}|\leq
253: \sqrt{\ro_{22}\ro_{33}}$, and we have the result:\\[2mm]
254: \textit{Concurrence of a density matrix} (12) \textit{is given by}
255: \begin{equation}
256: C(\ro)=2\,|\ro_{23}|
257: \end{equation}
258: As we will show, the class of density matrices given by (12) is
259: invariant with respect to the time evolution considered in the
260: paper, and formula (14) can be used to analyse the evolution of
261: entanglement of states which initially have the form (12).
262: \subsection{Violation of Bell inequalities}
263: The contradiction between quantum theory and local realism
264: expressed by the violation of Bell - CHSH inequality \cite{CHSH},
265: can be studied in the case of two - qubit system using simple
266: necessary and sufficient condition \cite{HHH,H}. Any state
267: $\ro\in\fE_{AB}$ can be written as
268: \begin{equation}
269: \ro=\frac{1}{4}\left(\I_{2}\otimes\I_{2}+\tl{r}\cdot\tl{\sigma}\otimes\I_{2}+\I_{2}\otimes
270: \tl{s}\cdot
271: \tl{\sigma}+\sum\limits_{n,m=1}^{3}t_{nm}\,\si{n}\otimes\si{m}\right)
272: \end{equation}
273: where $\I_{2}$ is the identity matrix in two dimensions,
274: $\si{1},\si{2},\si{3}$ are Pauli matrices, $\tl{r},\tl{s}$ are
275: vectors in $\R^{3}$ and
276: $\tl{r}\cdot\tl{\sigma}=\sum\limits_{j=1}^{3}r_{j}\si{j}$. The
277: coefficients
278: \begin{equation}
279: t_{nm}=\tr (\ro\,\si{n}\otimes\si{m})
280: \end{equation}
281: form a real matrix $T_{\ro}$. Define also real symmetric matrix
282: \begin{equation}
283: U_{\ro}=T_{\ro}^{T}\,T_{\ro}
284: \end{equation}
285: where $T_{\ro}^{T}$ is the transposition of $T_{\ro}$.
286: Consider now the family of
287: Bell operators
288: \begin{equation}
289: B_{CHSH}=\tl{a}\cdot\tl{\sigma}\otimes
290: (\tl{b}+\tl{b}^{\prime})\cdot\tl{\sigma}+\tl{a}^{\prime}\cdot\tl{\sigma}\otimes
291: (\tl{b}-\tl{b}^{\prime})\cdot\tl{\sigma}
292: \end{equation}
293: where $\tl{a},\,\tl{a}^{\prime},\,\tl{b},\,\tl{b}^{\prime}$ are
294: unit vectors in $\R^{3}$. Then CHSH inequality reads
295: \begin{equation}
296: |\tr (\ro\, B_{CHSH})|\leq 2
297: \end{equation}
298: Violation of inequality (19) by the density matrix (15) and some
299: Bell operator (18) can be checked by the following criterion: Let
300: \begin{equation}
301: m(\ro)=\max_{j<k}\; (u_{j}+u_{k})
302: \end{equation}
303: and $u_{j},\, j=1,2,3$ are the eigenvalues of $U_{\ro}$. As was
304: shown in \cite{HHH,H}
305: \begin{equation}
306: \max_{B_{CHSH}}\,\tr (\ro\, B_{CHSH})=2\,\sqrt{m(\ro)}
307: \end{equation}
308: Thus (19) is violated by some choice of
309: $\tl{a},\tl{a}^{\prime},\tl{b},\tl{b}^{\prime}$ iff $m(\ro)>1$.
310: \par
311: \noindent
312: If we consider subclass of the class of states (12)
313: consisting of density matrices of the form
314: \begin{equation}
315: \ro=\begin{pmatrix}0&0&0&0\\
316: 0&\ro_{22}&\ro_{23}&0\\
317: 0&\ro_{32}&\ro_{33}&0\\
318: 0&0&0&\ro_{44}
319: \end{pmatrix}
320: \end{equation}
321: then we obtain the following expression for $m(\ro)$
322: \begin{equation}
323: m(\ro)=\max\; (2\,C^{2}(\ro),\,(1-2\,\ro_{44})^{2}+C^{2}(\ro)\,)
324: \end{equation}
325: where $C(\ro)=2|\ro_{23}| $ is the concurrence of the state $\ro$.
326: Notice that the inequality
327: $$
328: (1-2\ro_{44})^{2}+C^{2}(\ro)>1
329: $$
330: is equivalent to
331: $$
332: |\ro_{23}|^{2}>\ro_{44}\,(1-\ro_{44})
333: $$
334: Let us introduce linear entropy of the state $\ro$
335: $$
336: S_{L}(\ro)=1-\tr\,\ro^{2}
337: $$
338: For states (22)
339: $$
340: \tr\,\ro^{2}=\ro_{22}^{2}+\ro_{33}^{2}+\ro_{44}^{2}+2\,|\ro_{23}\,|^{2}
341: $$
342: so using $(\ro_{22}+\ro_{33}+\ro_{44})^{2}=1$ we obtain
343: $$
344: S_{L}(\ro)=2\,(\ro_{22}\ro_{33}+\ro_{22}\ro_{44}+\ro_{33}\ro_{44}-|\ro_{23}|^{2}\,)
345: $$
346: On the other hand
347: $$
348: |\ro_{23}|^{2}-\ro_{44}\,(\ro_{22}+\ro_{33}\,)=|\ro_{23}|^{2}-\ro_{44}\,(1-\ro_{44}\,)>0
349: $$
350: so
351: $$
352: \ro_{22}\ro_{33}-\frac{1}{2}\,S_{L}(\ro)=|\ro_{23}|^{2}-\ro_{44}
353: \,(\ro_{22}+\ro_{33}\,)>0
354: $$
355: and we obtain the following
356: result: \\[4mm]
357: \textit{The states} \rm{(22)} \textit{ violate some Bell - CHSH
358: inequality if and only if $|\ro_{23}|>\frac{1}{2\sqrt{2}}$ or
359: $\ro_{22}\ro_{33}>\frac{1}{2}\,S_{L}(\ro)$.}
360: \newpage
361: \noindent
362: \section{Spontaneous Emission and Evolution of Entanglement}
363: We study time evolution of the system of two two-level atoms
364: separated by a distance $R$ when we take into account only the
365: dissipative process of spontaneous emission. The dynamics of such
366: system is given by the master equation \cite{Agar,FT1}
367: \begin{equation}
368: \frac{d\ro}{dt}=L_{D}\ro,\quad \ro\in \fE_{AB}
369: \end{equation}
370: with the following generator $L_{D}$
371: \begin{equation}
372: L_{D}\ro=\frac{1}{2}\sum\limits_{k,l=A,B}\ga_{kl}\,
373: (\,2\sa{-}{k}\ro\sa{+}{l}-\sa{+}{k}\sa{-}{l}\ro-\ro\sa{+}{k}\sa{-}{l}\,)
374: \end{equation}
375: where
376: \begin{equation}
377: \sa{\pm}{A}=\si{\pm}\otimes\I,\; \sa{\pm}{
378: B}=\I\otimes \si{\pm},\; \si{\pm}=\frac{1}{2}(\si{1}\pm i \si{2})
379: \end{equation}
380: and $\ga_{AA}=\ga_{BB}=\g,\;\ga_{AB}=\ga_{BA}=\ga=g\g$. Here $\gamma_{0}$
381: is the single atom spontaneous emission rate,
382: and $\gamma=g\gamma_{0}$ is a relaxation constant of photon
383: exchange. In the model, $g$ is the function of the distance $R$
384: between atoms and $g\to 1$ when $R\to 0$. In this section we
385: investigate the time evolution of the initial density matrix
386: $\ro$ of the compound system, governed by the semi - group
387: $\{T_{t}\}_{t\geq 0}$ generated by $L_{D}$. In particular, we will
388: study the time development of entanglement of $\ro$, measured by
389: concurrence. When $\ga <\g$, the semi-group $\{T_{t}\}_{t\geq 0}$
390: is uniquely relaxing, with the asymptotic state
391: $\ket{0}\otimes\ket{0}$. Thus, for any initial state $\ro$, the
392: concurrence $C(\ro_{t})$ approaches $0$ when $t\to \infty$. But
393: still there can be some transient entanglement between atoms
394: \cite{J,FT3,FT2}. In this section we study in details time evolution
395: of a given initial state $\ro= (\ro_{jk})$. Direct calculations
396: show that the state $\ro(t)$ at time $t$ has the following matrix
397: elements with respect to the basis $\ket{1}\otimes \ket{1},\,
398: \ket{1}\otimes\ket{0},\, \ket{0}\otimes\ket{1},\,
399: \ket{0}\otimes\ket{0}$
400: \begin{equation*}
401: \begin{split}
402: \ro_{11}(t)=&e^{-2\g t}\ro_{11}\\[2mm]
403: \ro_{12}(t)=&e^{-\frac{3}{2}\g t}\,(\ro_{12}\cosh \frac{\ga
404: t}{2}-\ro_{13}\sinh\frac{\ga t}{2}\,)\\[2mm]
405: \ro_{13}(t)=&e^{-\frac{3}{2}\g t}\,(\ro_{13}\cosh \frac{\ga
406: t}{2}-\ro_{12}\sinh\frac{\ga t}{2}\,)\\[2mm]
407: \ro_{14}(t)=&e^{-\g t}\ro_{14}\\[2mm]
408: \ro_{22}(t)=&-e^{-2\g
409: t}\frac{\ga^{2}+\g^{2}}{\g^{2}-\ga^{2}}\,\ro_{11}+ e^{-\g t}\bigg[
410: \frac{1}{2}(\ro_{22}-\ro_{33})+
411: \big(\frac{\ga^{2}+\g^{2}}{\g^{2}-\ga^{2}}\,\ro_{11}+\frac{1}{2}\,(\ro_{22}+\ro_{33})\big)\cosh
412: \ga t \\[2mm]
413: &-\frac{2\ga
414: \g}{\g^{2}-\ga^{2}}\,\ro_{11}-\mathrm{Re}\ro_{23}\sinh
415: \ga t )\bigg ]\\[2mm]
416: \ro_{33}(t)=&-e^{-2\g
417: t}\frac{\ga^{2}+\g^{2}}{\g^{2}-\ga^{2}}\,\ro_{11}+ e^{-\g t}\bigg[
418: \frac{1}{2}(\ro_{33}-\ro_{22})+
419: \big(\frac{\ga^{2}+\g^{2}}{\g^{2}-\ga^{2}}\,\ro_{11}+\frac{1}{2}\,(\ro_{22}+\ro_{33})\big)\cosh
420: \ga t \\[2mm]
421: &-\frac{2\ga
422: \g}{\g^{2}-\ga^{2}}\,\ro_{11}-\mathrm{Re}\ro_{23}\sinh
423: \ga t )\bigg ]
424: \end{split}
425: \end{equation*}
426: \begin{equation*}
427: \begin{split}
428: \ro_{23}(t)=&-e^{-2\g t}\frac{2\ga
429: \g}{\g^{2}-\ga^{2}}\,\ro_{11}+e^{-\g t}\,\bigg [
430: -\big(\frac{\ga^{2}+\g^{2}}{\g^{2}-\ga^{2}}\sinh \ga t+\cosh \ga
431: t\big)\,\ro_{11}+ i\mathrm{Im}\ro_{23}+\mathrm{Re}\ro_{23}\cosh\ga
432: t\\[2mm]
433: & -\frac{1}{2}(\ro_{22}+\ro_{33})\sinh \ga t\bigg]\\[2mm]
434: \ro_{24}(t)=&\big[e^{-\frac{3}{2}\g t}\,(\sinh \frac{\ga}{2}t-\ga
435: \cosh\frac{\ga}{2}t)+e^{-\frac{\g}{2}t}\,(\ga
436: \cosh\frac{\ga}{2}t-\sinh\frac{\ga}{2}t)\big]\ro_{12}+\\[2mm]
437: &\big[e^{-\frac{3}{2}\g t}\,(\ga\sinh \frac{\ga}{2}t-
438: \cosh\frac{\ga}{2}t)+e^{-\frac{\g}{2}t}\,(
439: \cosh\frac{\ga}{2}t-\ga\sinh\frac{\ga}{2}t)\big]\ro_{13}+\\[2mm]
440: &e^{-\frac{\g}{2}t}\big(\ro_{24}\, \cosh\frac{\ga}{2}t
441: -\ro_{34}\,\sinh\frac{\ga}{2}t\big)\\[2mm]
442: \ro_{34}(t)=&\big[e^{-\frac{3}{2}\g t}\,(\ga\sinh \frac{\ga}{2}t-
443: \cosh\frac{\ga}{2}t)+e^{-\frac{\g}{2}t}\,(
444: \cosh\frac{\ga}{2}t-\ga\sinh\frac{\ga}{2}t)\big]\ro_{12}+\\[2mm]
445: &\big[e^{-\frac{3}{2}\g t}\,(\sinh \frac{\ga}{2}t-
446: \ga\cosh\frac{\ga}{2}t)+e^{-\frac{\g}{2}t}\,(
447: \ga\cosh\frac{\ga}{2}t-\sinh\frac{\ga}{2}t)\big]\ro_{13}+\\[2mm]
448: &e^{-\frac{\g}{2}t}\big(\ro_{34}\, \cosh\frac{\ga}{2}t
449: -\ro_{24}\,\sinh\frac{\ga}{2}t\big)\\[2mm]
450: \ro_{44}(t)=&1+e^{-2\g
451: t}\frac{\g^{2}+3\ga^{2}}{\g^{2}-\ga^{2}}\ro_{11}+e^{-\g
452: t}\,\bigg[\big(\frac{4\ga\g}{\g^{2}-\ga^{2}}\sinh \ga
453: t-\frac{2(\ga^{2}+\g^{2})}{\g^{2}-\ga^{2}}\cosh \ga t\big
454: )\ro_{11}\\[2mm]
455: &-(\ro_{22}+\ro_{33})\cosh\ga t +2\mathrm{Re}\ro_{23}\,\sinh\ga
456: t\bigg]
457: \end{split}
458: \end{equation*}
459: The remaining matrix elements can be obtained by the Hermiticity
460: condition. One can simply check that the classes of states (12)
461: and (22) are invariant with respect to the above time evolution.
462: In particular, in both cases
463: \begin{equation}
464: \ro_{23}(t)=e^{-\g t}\,\big[\,\mathrm{Re}\, \ro_{23}\cosh\ga
465: t+i\,\mathrm{Im}\,\ro_{23}-\frac{1}{2}\,(\ro_{22}+\ro_{33})\sinh\ga
466: t\,\big]
467: \end{equation}
468: So we obtain the result:\\[2mm]
469: \textit{For initial states} (12) \textit{or} (22) \textit{the
470: concurrence at time $t$ is given by
471: \begin{equation}
472: C(\ro(t))=2\,e^{-\g t}\,\big|\,\big(\, \mathrm{Re}\,
473: \ro_{23}\cosh\ga
474: t+i\,\mathrm{Im}\,\ro_{23}-\frac{1}{2}\,(\ro_{22}+\ro_{33})\sinh\ga
475: t\,\big)\big|
476: \end{equation}
477: where $\ro_{jk}$ are matrix elements of the initial state.}\\[2mm]
478: Let us consider pure initial states $\Psi\in \C^{4}$ belonging to
479: the class (12). The most general pure state of this type can be
480: written as
481: \begin{equation}
482: \Psi=\cos\phi\cos\psi\,\ket{1}\otimes\ket{0}+
483: \sin\phi\cos\psi\,e^{i\Theta}\,\ket{0}\otimes\ket{1}+
484: \sin\psi\,e^{i\Xi}\,\ket{0}\otimes\ket{0}
485: \end{equation}
486: with $\phi,\,\psi\in [0,\frac{\pi}{2}],\; \Theta,\,\Xi\in
487: [0,2\pi]$. Using (14) we see that concurrence of (29) is given by
488: \begin{equation}
489: C(\Psi)=\cos^{2}\psi\,\sin 2\phi
490: \end{equation}
491: By (28), the time evolution of this initial concurrence is
492: described by the following function
493: \begin{equation}
494: C(\ro(t))=e^{-\g t}\,\cos^{2}\psi\, \big| \sin 2\phi\, \cos\Theta
495: \,\cosh \ga t -\sinh\ga t -i \sin2\phi\,\sin \Theta\,\big|
496: \end{equation}
497: The function (31) is simple to analyse when
498: $\phi=0$ or $\frac{\pi}{2}$. In this case
499: \begin{equation}
500: \Psi=e^{i\Theta}\,\cos\psi\,\ket{0}\otimes\ket{1}+
501: e^{i\Xi}\,\sin\psi\,\ket{0}\otimes\ket{0}
502: \end{equation}
503: and
504: \begin{equation}
505: C(\ro(t))=e^{-\g t}\, \cos^{2}\psi\,\sinh\ga t
506: \end{equation}
507: From the formula (33) we see that initial concurrence equal to
508: zero, increases in the time interval $[0,t_{\mathrm{max}}]$, where
509: \begin{equation}
510: t_{\mathrm{max}}=\frac{1}{2\ga}\ln\frac{\g+\ga}{\g-\ga}
511: \end{equation}
512: to the maximal value
513: \begin{equation}
514: C_{\mathrm{max}}=\cos^{2}\psi\,\frac{\ga}{\g-\ga}
515: \left(\frac{\g+\ga}{\g-\ga}\right)^{-\frac{\g+\ga}{2\ga}}
516: \end{equation}
517: and then asymptotically goes to zero (see \textbf{Fig. 1}).\\[8mm]
518: %\centerline{\epsffile{fj1.eps}}
519: \begin{picture}(300,300)
520: \put(50,70){\begin{picture}(180,180) \epsffile{fj1.eps}
521: \end{picture}}
522: \put(350,75){$\g t$}
523: \put(60,255){$C(\ro(t))$}
524: \put(120,150){$0.5$}
525: \put(130,180){$0.7$}
526: \put(140,220){$0.9$}
527: \end{picture}
528: \vskip -18mm
529: \noindent \centerline{\textbf{Fig. 1.} $C(\ro(t))$ for initial
530: states (32) with $\psi=0$ and different values of $\ga/\g$}
531: \vskip 8mm
532: \noindent
533: If $\phi$ is arbitrary, we can put for simplicity $\psi=0$. Then
534: \begin{equation}
535: \Psi=\cos\phi
536: \,\ket{1}\otimes\ket{0}+\sin\phi\,e^{i\Theta}\,\ket{0}\otimes\ket{1}
537: \end{equation}
538: and $C(\Psi)=\sin 2\phi$. The evolution of this initial
539: concurrence is given by
540: \begin{equation}
541: C(\ro(t))=e^{-\g t}\,\big |\,\sin2\phi\,\cos\Theta\,\cosh\ga t
542: -\sinh\ga t -i\,\sin2\phi\,\sin\Theta\,\big|
543: \end{equation}
544: Depending on values of $\phi$ and $\Theta$, the function (37) can
545: be strictly decreasing to zero, or can have one maximal value for some
546: $t$, or even can have one minimal and one maximal value. Let us
547: discuss all these possibilities by choosing some special initial
548: states from the class (36).\\[2mm]
549: \textbf{a.} Let $\Theta=0$. Then
550: \begin{equation}
551: \Psi=\cos\phi\,
552: \ket{1}\otimes\ket{0}+\sin\phi\,\ket{0}\otimes\ket{1}
553: \end{equation}
554: and
555: \begin{equation}
556: C(\ro(t))=e^{-\g t}\,\big|\, \sin 2\phi\, \cosh\ga t -\sinh \ga
557: t\,\big|
558: \end{equation}
559: The function (39) is decreasing to zero in the interval
560: $[0,t_{\mr{min}}]$ where
561: \begin{equation}
562: t_{\mr{min}}=\frac{1}{2\ga}\,\ln\frac{1+\sin 2\phi}{1-\sin 2\phi}
563: \end{equation}
564: Then in the interval $[t_{\mr{min}},t_{\mr{max}}]$, with
565: \begin{equation}
566: t_{\mr{max}}=\frac{1}{2\ga}\,\ln\frac{(1+\sin
567: 2\phi)(\g+\ga)}{(1-\sin 2\phi)(\g-\ga)}
568: \end{equation}
569: (39) increases to the maximal value
570: \begin{equation}
571: C_{\mr{max}}=\frac{\ga\,|\cos
572: 2\phi|}{\sqrt{\g^{2}-\ga^{2}}}\,\left(\frac{(1+\sin
573: 2\phi)(\g+\ga)}{(1-\sin 2\phi)(\g-\ga)}\right)^{-\frac{\g}{2\ga}}
574: \end{equation}
575: For $t>t_{\mr{max}}$, (39) goes asymptotically to $0$. For
576: sufficiently small initial concurrence $C_{\mr{max}}>C(\Psi)$ but
577: for larger entanglement of the initial state, the maximal
578: entanglement produced
579: during the evolution is smaller then $C(\Psi)$ (see \textbf{Fig. 2.} below). \\[8mm]
580: \begin{picture}(300,300)
581: \put(50,70){\begin{picture}(180,180) \epsffile{fj2.eps}
582: \end{picture}}
583: \put(350,75){$\g t$}
584: \put(60,255){$C(\ro(t))$}
585: \put(120,120){$\phi=\pi/20$}
586: \put(140,165){$\phi=\pi/40$}
587: \end{picture}
588: \vskip -18mm \noindent \centerline{\textbf{Fig. 2.} $C(\ro(t))$
589: for initial states (38), with $\phi=\pi/40,\,\pi/20$ and
590: $\ga/\g=0.75$} \vskip 8mm \noindent \textbf{b.} Let $\Theta=\pi$.
591: Then
592: \begin{equation}
593: \Psi=\cos\phi\,\ket{1}\otimes\ket{0}-\sin\phi\,\ket{0}\otimes\ket{1}
594: \end{equation}
595: and
596: \begin{equation}
597: C(\ro(t))=e^{-\g t}\, \big|\, \sin 2\phi\,\cosh\ga t+\sinh\ga
598: t\,\big|
599: \end{equation}
600: If $\sin 2\phi\geq \frac{\ga}{\g}$ then function (44) is
601: monotonically decreasing to $0$. On the other hand, if $\sin 2\phi
602: <\frac{\ga}{\g}$ then at time
603: \begin{equation}
604: t_{\mr{max}}=\frac{1}{2\ga}\,\ln\frac{(1-\sin
605: 2\phi)(\g+\ga)}{(1+\sin 2\phi)(\g-\ga)}
606: \end{equation}
607: (44) attains local maximum
608: \begin{equation}
609: C_{\mr{max}}=\frac{\ga\,|\cos
610: 2\phi|}{\sqrt{\g^{2}-\ga^{2}}}\,\left(\frac{(1-\sin
611: 2\phi)(\g+\ga)}{(1+\sin 2\phi)(\g-\ga)}\right)^{-\frac{\g}{2\ga}}
612: \end{equation}
613: $C_{\mr{max}}$ is always greater then initial concurrence
614: $C(\Psi)$ and
615: \begin{equation}
616: C_{\mr{max}}\to\frac{1+\sin 2\phi}{2}\quad\text{when}\quad
617: \ga\to\g
618: \end{equation}
619: and
620: \begin{equation}
621: C_{\mr{max}}\to \frac{\ga}{\g}\quad{when}\quad \sin 2\phi\to
622: \frac{\ga}{\g}
623: \end{equation}
624: Thus, for entanged pure initial states (43) the dissipative
625: process of spontaneous emission increases entanglement, provided
626: that the initial entanglement was smaller then
627: $\frac{\ga}{\g}$ (see \textbf{Fig. 3}).\\[8mm]
628: \noindent
629: \begin{picture}(300,300)
630: \put(50,70){\begin{picture}(180,180) \epsffile{fj3.eps}
631: \end{picture}}
632: \put(350,75){$\g t$}
633: \put(60,255){$ C(\ro(t))$}
634: \put(85,112){$0.1$}
635: \put(82,145){$0.4$}
636: \put(79,180){$0.7$}
637: \put(85,210){$1$}
638: \end{picture}
639: \vskip -18mm \noindent \centerline{\textbf{Fig. 3.} $C(\ro(t))$
640: for initial states (43) with $C(\Psi)=0.1,\,0.4,\,0.7,\,1$ and
641: $\ga/\g=0.75$}
642: \vskip 8mm \noindent
643: \textbf{c.} Let
644: $\Theta=\pi/2$. Then
645: \begin{equation}
646: \Psi=\cos\phi\,\ket{1}\otimes\ket{0}+i\,\sin\phi\,\ket{0}\otimes\ket{1}
647: \end{equation}
648: and
649: \begin{equation}
650: C(\ro(t))=e^{-\g t}\, \big|\, \sinh\ga t +i\,\sin 2\phi\,\big|
651: \end{equation}
652: One can show that if $|\sin 4\phi|<\ga/\g$ then (50) achieves
653: local minimum at
654: \begin{equation}
655: t_{\mr{min}}=\frac{1}{2\ga}\,\ln\frac{\g\cos 4\phi
656: -\sqrt{\ga^{2}-\g^{2}\sin^{2} 4\phi}}{\g-\ga}
657: \end{equation}
658: and local maximum at
659: \begin{equation}
660: t_{\mr{max}}=\frac{1}{2\ga}\,\ln\frac{\g\cos 4\phi
661: +\sqrt{\ga^{2}-\g^{2}\sin^{2} 4\phi}}{\g-\ga}
662: \end{equation}
663: with the corresponding values of concurrence
664: \begin{equation}
665: C_{\mr{min}}=\left(\frac{\g\cos 4\phi
666: -\sqrt{\ga^{2}-\g^{2}\sin^{2}
667: 4\phi}}{\g-\ga}\right)^{-\frac{\g}{2\ga}}\,\sqrt{\frac{\ga^{2}\cos
668: 4\phi -\ga\,\sqrt{\ga^{2}-\g^{2}\sin^{2}
669: 4\phi}}{2(\g^{2}-\ga^{2})}}
670: \end{equation}
671: and
672: \begin{equation}
673: C_{\mr{max}}=\left(\frac{\g\cos 4\phi
674: +\sqrt{\ga^{2}-\g^{2}\sin^{2}
675: 4\phi}}{\g-\ga}\right)^{-\frac{\g}{2\ga}}\,\sqrt{\frac{\ga^{2}\cos
676: 4\phi +\ga\,\sqrt{\ga^{2}-\g^{2}\sin^{2}
677: 4\phi}}{2(\g^{2}-\ga^{2})}}
678: \end{equation}
679: For other cases, the function (50) is monotonically decreasing to
680: $0$ (see \textbf{Fig. 4.} below). \vskip 8mm \noindent
681: \begin{picture}(300,300)
682: \put(50,70){\begin{picture}(180,180) \epsffile{fj4.eps}
683: \end{picture}}
684: \put(350,75){$\g t$}
685: \put(60,255){$ C(\ro(t))$}
686: \put(90,110){$\phi=\pi/20$}
687: \put(110,160){$\phi=\pi/8$}
688: \end{picture}
689: \vskip -18mm \noindent \centerline{\textbf{Fig. 4.} $C(\ro(t))$
690: for initial states (49) with $\phi=\pi/20,\,\pi/40$ and
691: $\ga/\g=0.75$} \vskip 8mm \noindent
692: \newpage
693: \noindent
694: \section{Evolution of Nonlocality}
695: Nonlocality of quantum theory manifesting by violation of Bell
696: inequalities is strictly connected with the existence of entangled
697: states. It is known that every pure entangled state violates some
698: Bell inequality (see e.g. \cite{Gisin}). But for mixed entangled
699: states it is no longer true \cite{Werner}. So it is interesting to
700: discuss how dissipative process of spontaneous emission
701: influences nonlocal properties of initial states. For simplicity
702: we restrict the class of states considered below to density
703: matrices of the form (22). For that class we can apply the
704: results of Sect. 2.2.
705: \par
706: \noindent As the initial states we take the states (43). Note
707: that at time $t$, the state $\ro(t)$ will have the form (22). The
708: initial entanglement is non-zero, so violation of some Bell -
709: CHSH inequality occurs at time $t=0$. What happens during the
710: evolution? Consider the inequality
711: \begin{equation}
712: \ro_{22}(t)\ro_{33}(t)>\frac{1}{2}S_{L}(\ro(t))
713: \end{equation}
714: which is sufficient to nonlocality of the state $\ro(t)$. Observe
715: that $S_{L}(\ro(0))=0$ and $S_{L}(\ro(t))$ is increasing in some
716: time - interval. On the other hand,
717: $$
718: \ro_{22}(0)\ro_{33}(0)\geq
719: |\ro_{23}(0)|^{2}>0
720: $$
721: and $\ro_{22}(t)\ro_{33}(t)$ asymptotically goes to $0$, so there
722: is some non - empty interval $0\leq t <t_{1}$ for which the
723: inequality (55) is satisfied. Thus for $0\leq t <t_{1}$, all
724: states $\ro(t)$ will still have nonlocal properties. We may also
725: introduce the time $t_{\mr{n}}$ after which nonlocality is lost.
726: To this end, besides $t_{1}$ consider $t_{2}$ such that
727: $$
728: |\ro_{23}(t_{2})|=\frac{1}{2\sqrt{2}}
729: $$
730: Then
731: \begin{equation}
732: t_{\mr{n}}=\max\, (t_{1},t_{2})
733: \end{equation}
734: By the results of Sect. 2.2, all states $\ro(t)$ for $t\geq
735: t_{\mr{n}}$ will admit local hidden variable model. To illustrate
736: this concept, consider as initial states $\Psi^{+}$ and
737: $\Psi^{-}$ (symmetric and antsymmetric states)
738: $$
739: \Psi^{\pm}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\,\left(
740: \ket{1}\otimes\ket{0}\pm\ket{0}\otimes\ket{1}\right)
741: $$
742: Let $\ro^{\pm}(t)$ denote corresponding density matrices at time $t$. Then
743: $$
744: |\ro_{23}^{\pm}(t)|=\frac{1}{2}\,e^{-(\g \pm\ga)t}
745: $$
746: and
747: $$
748: \ro_{22}^{\pm}(t)\ro_{33}^{\pm}(t)=\frac{1}{4}\,e^{-2(\g\pm\ga)t},\quad
749: S_{L}(\ro^{\pm}(t))=2\left(e^{-(\g\pm\ga)t}-e^{-2(\g\pm\ga)t}\right)
750: $$
751: We see that
752: $$
753: t_{1}=\frac{1}{\g\pm \ga}\;\ln\frac{5}{4},\quad
754: t_{2}=\frac{1}{\g\pm \ga}\;\frac{\ln 2}{2}
755: $$
756: Thus
757: $$
758: t_{\mr{n}}=\frac{1}{\g\pm \ga}\;\frac{\ln 2}{2}
759: $$
760: Note that for antisymmetric state $\Psi^{-}$ and $\ga$ close to
761: $\g$, $t_{\mr{n}}$ goes to infinity.
762: \par
763: \noindent It is also interesting to study in more details time
764: evolution of the measure of nonlocality which may be defined as follows
765: \begin{equation}
766: n(\ro)=\max\, (\,0,\,m(\ro)-1\,)
767: \end{equation}
768: As is
769: well known, $m(\ro)\leq 2$, so $0\leq n(\ro)\leq 1$ and larger value of
770: $n(\ro)$ gretar then $1$ means violation of CHSH inequality to a larger extent.
771: Since $m(\ro)=2$ for maximally entangled pure states which maximally
772: violate CHSH inequalities, for them $n(\ro)=1$. To obtain analytic expression for
773: $n(\ro(t))$ we can utilize formula (23). Formula (23) is further
774: simplified if we take such initial states that
775: \begin{equation}
776: |\ro_{23}(t)|<\frac{1}{2\sqrt{2}}
777: \end{equation}
778: for all $t$. This condition can be achieved if
779: $$
780: \frac{\ga}{\g}<\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}
781: $$
782: Then inequality (58) is satisfied and $m(\ro(t))>1$ if and only
783: if
784: \begin{equation}
785: (1-2\ro_{44}(t))^{2}+C^{2}(\ro(t))>1
786: \end{equation}
787: and to study the time evolution of nonlocality, we only need to
788: know time-dependence of the left hand side of (59). If we take
789: initial state with $\sin 2\phi<\frac{\ga}{\g}<\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}$,
790: then during the time evolution $C(\ro(t))$ increases to the
791: maximal value $C_{\mr{max}}<\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}$ in the interval
792: $[0,t_{\mr{max}}]$. At the same time,
793: \begin{equation}
794: (1-2\ro_{44})^{2}=\left(\,2e^{-\g t}\,( \cosh\ga t+\sin
795: 2\phi\,\sinh\ga t) -1\,\right)^{2}
796: \end{equation}
797: decreases so fast that left hand side of (59) is a decreasing
798: function of $t$ (see \textbf{Fig. 5, 6} below).
799: Thus we obtain the result:\\[2mm]
800: \textit{For initial states} (43) \textit{ and $\sin
801: 2\phi<\frac{\ga}{\g}<\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}$,
802: nonlocality of $\ro(t)$ given by $n(\ro(t))$ decreases during the time
803: evolution even if the entanglement increases.}
804: \\[4mm]
805: \begin{picture}(300,300)
806: \put(50,70){\begin{picture}(180,180) \epsffile{fj5.eps}
807: \end{picture}}
808: \put(350,75){$\g t$}
809: %\put(60,255){$ C(\ro(t))$}
810: %\put(90,110){$\phi=\pi/20$} \put(110,160){$\phi=\pi/8$}
811: \end{picture}
812: \vskip -18mm \noindent \centerline{\textbf{Fig. 5.} $C(\ro(t))$
813: (dotted line) and $(1-2\ro_{44}(t))^{2}$ (solid line) for initial
814: state (43) with $C(\Psi)=0.3$ and $\ga/\g=0.7$}\vskip 4mm
815: \noindent
816: \begin{picture}(300,300)
817: \put(50,70){\begin{picture}(180,180) \epsffile{fj6.eps}
818: \end{picture}}
819: \put(350,75){$\g t$}
820: \put(60,255){$ n(\ro(t))$}
821: %\put(90,110){$\phi=\pi/20$} \put(110,160){$\phi=\pi/8$}
822: \end{picture}
823: \vskip -18mm \noindent \centerline{\textbf{Fig. 6.} $n(\ro(t))$
824: for initial state (43) with $C(\Psi)=0.3$ and $\ga/\g=0.7$}
825: \vskip 4mm \noindent
826: Numerical analysis indicates that for other initial states (43)
827: for which $m(\ro(t))$ is defined by the whole expression (23), the
828: nonlocality $n(\ro(t))$ also monotonically goes to $0$
829: irrespective of the evolution of entanglement (see \textbf{Fig. 7} below).
830: \vskip 4mm \noindent
831: \begin{picture}(300,300)
832: \put(50,70){\begin{picture}(180,180) \epsffile{fj7.eps}
833: \end{picture}}
834: \put(350,75){$\g t$} \put(60,255){$ n(\ro(t))$}
835: \put(110,130){$0.9$} \put(90,110){$0.8$} \put(130,145){$1.0$}
836: \end{picture}
837: \vskip -18mm \noindent \centerline{\textbf{Fig. 7.} $n(\ro(t))$
838: for initial states (43) with $C(\Psi)=0.8,\,0.9,\,1.0$ and
839: $\ga/\g=0.7$}
840: \vskip 8mm \noindent
841: \newpage
842: \noindent
843: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
844: \bibitem{Dicke} R.H. Dicke, Phys. Rev. \textbf{93}, 99(1954).
845: \bibitem{dill} M. Dillard, H.R. Robl, Phys. Rev. \textbf{184},
846: 312(1969).
847: \bibitem{lemb1} R.H. Lehmberg, Phys. Rev. \textbf{181}, 32(1969).
848: \bibitem{lemb2} R.H. Lehmberg, Phys. Rev. \textbf{A 2}, 883(1970);
849: \textbf{A 2}, 889(1970).
850: \bibitem{plenio} M.B. Plenio, S.F. Huelga, Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{88}, 197901(2002).
851: \bibitem{kim}M.S. Kim, J. Lee, D. Ahn, P.L. Knight, Phys. Rev.
852: A\textbf{65}, 040101(R)(2002).
853: \bibitem{milb} S. Schneider, G.J. Milburn, Phys. Rev. A\textbf{65},
854: 042107(2002).
855: \bibitem{kni}M.B. Plenio, S.F. Huelga, A. Beige, P.L. Knight,
856: Phys. Rev. A\textbf{59}, 2468(1999).
857: \bibitem{J} L. Jak{\'o}bczyk, J. Phys. \textbf{A 35}, 6383(2002),
858: J. Phys. \textbf{A 36}, 1537(2003) (Corrigendum).
859: \bibitem{FT3} Z. Ficek, R. Tana\'{s}, quant-ph/0302124
860: \bibitem{FT2} Z. Ficek, R. Tana\'{s}, quant-ph/0307045.
861: \bibitem{Alicki} R. Alicki, K. Lendi, \textit{Quantum Dynamical
862: Semigroups and Aplications}, Lecture Notes in Phys. Vol 286,
863: Springer, Berlin, 1987.
864: \bibitem{Agar} G.S. Agarwal, \textit{Quantum Statistical Theories
865: of Spontaneous Emission and their Relation to Other Approaches},
866: Springer, Berlin, 1974.
867: \bibitem{FT1} Z. Ficek, R. Tana\'{s}, Phys. Rep. \textbf{372},369(2002)
868: \bibitem{HW} S. Hill, W.K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{78},
869: 5022(1997).
870: \bibitem{W} W.K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{80},
871: 2254(1998).
872: \bibitem{Werner} R.F. Werner, Phys. Rev. A\textbf{40}, 4277(1989).
873: \bibitem{Bennett} Ch. Bennett, P.D. DiVincenzo, J. Smolin, W.K.
874: Wootters, Phys. Rev. \textbf{A 54}, 3824(1996).
875: \bibitem{CHSH} J.F. Clauser, M.A. Horne, A. Shimony and R.A. Holt,
876: Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{23}, 880(1969).
877: \bibitem{HHH} R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, Phys.
878: Lett. \textbf{A 200}, 340(1995).
879: \bibitem{H} R. Horodecki, Phys. Lett. \textbf{A 210}, 223(1996).
880: \bibitem{Gisin} N. Gisin, Phys. Lett. \textbf{A 154}, 201(1991).
881: \end{thebibliography}
882: \end{document}
883: