1:

 \section{Data analysis and selection criteria}

7:

 The strategy of the analysis was to identify $\nudecay$ candidates 

56:

 blind analysis was performed.\  Events in a signal box 

57:

 defined  by  $\C < 2\times10^{-5}$ were excluded from the analysis of the data

1:

 \section{Analysis for Special Cases}~\label{analysis}

17:

 		\includegraphics[scale=0.35]{figs/ErrAnalysis.ps}

19:

 	\label{fig:errAnalysis}

32:

 occurs (identical to the fixed velocity analysis above) and the second

67:

 Figure \ref{fig:errAnalysis} shows the graph of error against $n$ . As

69:

 graph in Figure \ref{fig:errAnalysis}. We can see that for $n>0$, the

82:

 error vector. Graph in Figure \ref{fig:errAnalysis} shows the absolute

93:

 Figure \ref{fig:errAnalysis} shows the comparison of MADRD protocol

1:

   \section{Analysis}

2:

   \label{s:analysis}

13:

   properties.  We restrict our analysis to homogeneous groups with an

22:

   analysis gives him or her more control over the final result, at the

38:

   analysis in real-time. We first describe how elements are extracted given a chosen

44:

   \subsection{Element analysis}

47:

   The purpose of element analysis is to cluster a set of strokes drawn by

54:

   analysis. Then, valid pairs of elements that can be perceived as a

56:

   points and lines is illustrated in \fig{f:element_analysis}.

114:

   \subsection{Group analysis}

136:

   justified from a perceptual point of view: basing our analysis

1:

 \section{Analysis}

7:

 For local stability analysis it is useful to note that the model has

20:

 is also useful for local stability analysis that the determinant of \eqref{GeneralJacobian}

476:

 The stability analysis above delimits the situations in which evolutionary cycles occur. 

2:

 \section{Data \& data analysis}\label{analysis} 

1:

 %% $Id: analysis.tex,v 1.10 2006/07/24 20:33:19 chcheng Exp $

2:

 \section{TIME-DEPENDENT ANALYSIS}

3:

 \label{sec:analysis}

16:

 ...(57 bytes skipped)... mean value of $497.2\mevcc$  and a resolution of $2.5\mevcc$ for both decay modes. For the further analysis we define the \KS signal region as a $\pm10\mevcc$ mass window centered around the signal mean valu...(17 bytes skipped)...

2:

 %%%%%%%%%%% ANALYSIS %%%%%%%%%%%%%

5:

 \bsection{Analysis}

6:

 \label{s.Analysis}

15:

 %Our analysis is focused first on the one  cluster-head scenario, and

61:

 A detailed mathematical analysis of  the performance of the cluster-head

66:

 the results of this analysis.

149:

 not} depend on $d(\cdot)$ which makes the analysis of $\urho(x), \orho(x)$

54:

 the available luminosity for the analysis, while minimising the uncertainty in the measured polarisation, on a run-by-run basis.

2:

 \section{Common Analysis Aspects}

7:

 base for the analyses presented here. However, each analysis may differ in some details. 

10:

 analysis are provided in the following sections. 

58:

 To improve the resolution on these four-momenta this analysis

143:

 example of such a $\chi^2$ fit for the \mx\ analysis is shown in Fig.~\ref{mxfit}. 

144:

 For the exclusive analysis the background normalization is 

209:

 by repeating the analysis with only the \Bz\Bzb or the \Bp\Bm Monte Carlo. 

1:

 \section{\label{sec:ana}Analysis}

1:

 \section{Analysis}

76:

 \subsubsection {Performance Analysis}

135:

 analysis. Results are shown in the figure \ref{fig:geco2}, \ref{fig:geardme1}

2:

 \chapter{Analysis}

11:

 ...(370 bytes skipped)...zations and CompHEP \cite{comphep} where the beam polarizations are not taken into account. In this analysis mainly the O'Mega generator is used since it includes the Standard Model anomalous triple gauge bos...(606 bytes skipped)...

62:

 ...(775 bytes skipped)... that can be included as well as background events to be overlayed to each processed event. In this analysis...(412 bytes skipped)...ma\gamma$-detector. The best estimates for the energy flow objects are stored such that the physics analysis package VECSUB \cite{vecsub} can be used directly.

129:

 ...(1613 bytes skipped)...logarithms while for the light quark masses the $y_{cut}$ parameter regulates divergencies. In this analysis massless quarks are assumed, except the $b$ quarks which are assumed to be massive.

207:

 ...(401 bytes skipped)...l particles in the region above the line shown in (\textit{b}) and (\textit{d}) are rejected in the analysis.}

239:

 After the pileup rejection, the remaining tracks of the event are collected and the analysis is done on the 'event level' applying several successive cuts. A cluster analysis i.e. determination of the number of jets present in the event and reconstruction of the correspondi...(108 bytes skipped)...

571:

 This model shows that the fit method applied in the present analysis is correct. If ``data'' and Monte Carlo samples are identical, the central value is correctly estim...(193 bytes skipped)...

1:

 \chapter{Analysis techniques}

2:

 \label{ch:analysis}

216:

 The following analysis assumes that the eclipse is solely of a white

5:

 basis for the \mx-\Q\ analysis presented here. 

1:

 \section{Analysis method}

2:

 \label{sec:Analysis}

112:

 test the analysis strategy and the agreement between the

192:

 consider in this analysis are determined from detailed Monte

557:

 The analysis uses the following $\tau$ decay channels: 

1:

 \section{Overview of Analysis Method}

4:

 The analysis strategy follows closely that of Ref. \cite{ichep04}. 

1:

 \chapter{Analysis method of identified charged particle spectra}

3:

 In this section the analysis technique of identified charged particle spectra measurements of $\pi^{\pm}$, $K^{\pm}$, $\overline...(83 bytes skipped)...

5:

 \section{General procedure of data analysis}

7:

 ...(7 bytes skipped)...the detailed discussion, a general overview is given to provide a conceptual framework for the data analysis...(43 bytes skipped)...icle spectra and their properties for identified pions, kaons and protons/antiprotons. Steps of the analysis leading to the fully corrected identified particle spectra are listed below:

10:

 	\item{Once a good event is identified, good tracks are selected based on the analysis specific quality cuts.

49:

 	\resizebox{.9\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics{Plots/analysis/pp_multiplicity3.eps}}

61:

 	\resizebox{.9\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics{Plots/analysis/dAuMult.eps}}

70:

 	\resizebox{.9\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics{Plots/analysis/dAu_TPC_FTPC_mult.eps}}

79:

 	\resizebox{.9\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics{Plots/analysis/dAuMult2.eps}}

98:

 	\resizebox{.9\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics{Plots/analysis/AuAuMult.eps}}

110:

 ...(195 bytes skipped)...\% as shown in Table~\ref{tab:auau_coll_prop}. The last centrality bin 80-100\% is not used in data analysis due to significant trigger bias.

114:

 Tracks selected for spectra analysis...(576 bytes skipped)...nted as shown in Table~\ref{Tab:qa_cuts}. Set 1 represents the default quality cuts for the spectra analysis implemented in this work.

164:

 The correction in our analysis relies on good knowledge of the detector and its simulation. The STAR geometry has been implemented...(462 bytes skipped)...

175:

 	\resizebox{.9\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics{Plots/analysis/all_XY_hits.eps}}

198:

 	\resizebox{.45\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics{Plots/analysis/Piminus_longRes_dipAng_p2.eps}}

199:

 	\resizebox{.45\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics{Plots/analysis/Piminus_longResMean_dipAng_p2.eps}}

209:

 	\resizebox{.45\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics{Plots/analysis/Piminus_longRes_z_p2.eps}}

210:

 	\resizebox{.45\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics{Plots/analysis/Piminus_longResMean_z_p2.eps}}

220:

 	\resizebox{.45\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics{Plots/analysis/Piminus_transRes_crosAng_p2.eps}}

221:

 	\resizebox{.45\textwidth}{!}{\includegraphics{Plots/analysis/Piminus_transRes_z_p2.eps}}

232:

 Since the same analysis cuts are applied on the embedding and on real data, to extract the efficiencies one has to compare ...(136 bytes skipped)...

239:

 \includegraphics{Plots/analysis/pp_pim_dca_in_pT_200_300_range.eps}}	

241:

 \includegraphics{Plots/analysis/pp_pim_dca_in_pT_600_700_range.eps}}

252:

 \includegraphics{Plots/analysis/pp_pim_nfit_in_pT_200_300_range.eps}}	

254:

 \includegraphics{Plots/analysis/pp_pim_nfit_in_pT_600_700_range.eps}}

265:

 \includegraphics{Plots/analysis/pp_km_dca_in_pT_300_400_range.eps}}	

267:

 \includegraphics{Plots/analysis/pp_km_dca_in_pT_600_700_range.eps}}

278:

 \includegraphics{Plots/analysis/pp_km_nfit_in_pT_300_400_range.eps}}	

280:

 \includegraphics{Plots/analysis/pp_km_nfit_in_pT_600_700_range.eps}}

292:

 \includegraphics{Plots/analysis/pp_pbar_dca_in_pT_400_500_range.eps}}	

294:

 \includegraphics{Plots/analysis/pp_pbar_dca_in_pT_800_900_range.eps}}

305:

 \includegraphics{Plots/analysis/pp_pbar_nfit_in_pT_300_400_range.eps}}	

307:

 \includegraphics{Plots/analysis/pp_pbar_nfit_in_pT_700_800_range.eps}}

323:

 \includegraphics{Plots/analysis/auau62_pim_dca_in_pT_300_400_cent_0_range.eps}}	

325:

 \includegraphics{Plots/analysis/auau62_pim_dca_in_pT_300_400_cent_8_range.eps}}

336:

 \includegraphics{Plots/analysis/auau62_pim_dca_in_pT_500_600_cent_0_range.eps}}	

338:

 \includegraphics{Plots/analysis/auau62_pim_dca_in_pT_500_600_cent_8_range.eps}}

349:

 \includegraphics{Plots/analysis/auau62_pim_nfit_in_pT_300_400_cent_0_range.eps}}	

351:

 \includegraphics{Plots/analysis/auau62_pim_nfit_in_pT_300_400_cent_8_range.eps}}

362:

 \includegraphics{Plots/analysis/auau62_pim_nfit_in_pT_500_600_cent_0_range.eps}}	

364:

 \includegraphics{Plots/analysis/auau62_pim_nfit_in_pT_500_600_cent_8_range.eps}}

412:

 		\includegraphics[width=0.9\textwidth]{Plots/analysis/eloss_pp.eps}

413:

 		\includegraphics[width=0.9\textwidth]{Plots/analysis/eloss_dau.eps}

414:

 		\includegraphics[width=0.9\textwidth]{Plots/analysis/eloss_auau62cent.eps}

415:

 		\includegraphics[width=0.9\textwidth]{Plots/analysis/eloss_auau62per.eps}			

444:

 ...(36 bytes skipped)...d off-line to the raw data upon selecting tracks from the dE/dx distribution to be used for spectra analysis. 

461:

 		\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{Plots/analysis/vtx_efficiencies_pp.eps}

462:

 		\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{Plots/analysis/vtx_efficiencies_dau.eps}

475:

 In data analysis...(357 bytes skipped)...ts with $z$ vertex position are selected from $\pm$ 30.0 cm in pp and $\pm$ 50.0 cm in dAu for data analysis. The overall vertex (in)efficiency can be determined as the ratio of the number of reconstructed go...(116 bytes skipped)...

484:

 		\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{Plots/analysis/multimap_pp.eps}

485:

 		\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{Plots/analysis/multimap_dau.eps}

506:

 		\includegraphics[width=0.85\textwidth]{Plots/analysis/pp_dau_vtx_eff.eps}

514:

 		\includegraphics[width=0.85\textwidth]{Plots/analysis/fake_spectra_pp.eps}

533:

 		\includegraphics[width=0.85\textwidth]{Plots/analysis/pp_dAu_fake_mb.eps}

559:

 		\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{Plots/analysis/pp_tracking_eff_neg.eps}

560:

 		\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{Plots/analysis/pp_tracking_eff_pos.eps}

566:

 		\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{Plots/analysis/dau_tracking_eff_neg.eps}

567:

 		\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{Plots/analysis/dau_tracking_eff_pos.eps}

573:

 		\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{Plots/analysis/auau62_treff05_neg.eps}

574:

 		\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{Plots/analysis/auau62_treff05_pos.eps}

576:

 		\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{Plots/analysis/auau62_treff510_neg.eps}

577:

 		\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{Plots/analysis/auau62_treff510_pos.eps}

579:

 		\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{Plots/analysis/auau62_treff1020_neg.eps}

580:

 		\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{Plots/analysis/auau62_treff1020_pos.eps}

582:

 		\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{Plots/analysis/auau62_treff2030_neg.eps}

583:

 		\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{Plots/analysis/auau62_treff2030_pos.eps}

585:

 		\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{Plots/analysis/auau62_treff3040_neg.eps}

586:

 		\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{Plots/analysis/auau62_treff3040_pos.eps}

620:

 		\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{Plots/analysis/auau62_treff4050_neg.eps}

621:

 		\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{Plots/analysis/auau62_treff4050_pos.eps}

622:

 		\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{Plots/analysis/auau62_treff5060_neg.eps}

623:

 		\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{Plots/analysis/auau62_treff5060_pos.eps}

624:

 		\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{Plots/analysis/auau62_treff6070_neg.eps}

625:

 		\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{Plots/analysis/auau62_treff6070_pos.eps}

626:

 	  \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{Plots/analysis/auau62_treff7080_neg.eps}

627:

 		\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{Plots/analysis/auau62_treff7080_pos.eps}

712:

 		\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{Plots/analysis/PiBG_pp_mb.eps}

713:

 		\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{Plots/analysis/PipBG_pp_mb.eps}

720:

 		\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{Plots/analysis/PiBG_dAu_mb.eps}

721:

 		\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{Plots/analysis/PipBG_dAu_mb.eps}

730:

 		\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{Plots/analysis/PiBG_AuAu62.eps}

731:

 		\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{Plots/analysis/PipBG_AuAu62.eps}

799:

 		\includegraphics[width=0.3\textwidth]{Plots/analysis/protonBG_nch_0_5_pT_400_450.eps}

800:

 		\includegraphics[width=0.3\textwidth]{Plots/analysis/protonBG_nch_0_5_pT_600_650.eps}

801:

 		\includegraphics[width=0.3\textwidth]{Plots/analysis/protonBG_nch_0_5_pT_900_950.eps}

802:

 		\includegraphics[width=0.3\textwidth]{Plots/analysis/protonBG_nch_70_80_pT_400_450.eps}

803:

 		\includegraphics[width=0.3\textwidth]{Plots/analysis/protonBG_nch_70_80_pT_600_650.eps}

804:

 		\includegraphics[width=0.3\textwidth]{Plots/analysis/protonBG_nch_70_80_pT_900_950.eps}

815:

 \includegraphics[width=0.3\textwidth]{Plots/analysis/protonBG_nch_1_100_pT_40_45.eps}

816:

 \includegraphics[width=0.3\textwidth]{Plots/analysis/protonBG_nch_1_100_pT_60_65.eps}

817:

 \includegraphics[width=0.3\textwidth]{Plots/analysis/protonBG_nch_1_100_pT_90_95.eps}

831:

 \includegraphics[width=0.3\textwidth]{Plots/analysis/protonBG_nch_1_2_pT_40_45.eps}

832:

 \includegraphics[width=0.3\textwidth]{Plots/analysis/protonBG_nch_1_2_pT_60_65.eps}

833:

 \includegraphics[width=0.3\textwidth]{Plots/analysis/protonBG_nch_1_2_pT_90_95.eps}

852:

 \includegraphics[width=0.3\textwidth]{Plots/analysis/protonBG_nch_9_100_pT_40_45.eps}

853:

 \includegraphics[width=0.3\textwidth]{Plots/analysis/protonBG_nch_9_100_pT_60_65.eps}

854:

 \includegraphics[width=0.3\textwidth]{Plots/analysis/protonBG_nch_9_100_pT_90_95.eps}

865:

 \includegraphics[width=0.3\textwidth]{Plots/analysis/protonBG_nch_0_200_pT_40_45.eps}

866:

 \includegraphics[width=0.3\textwidth]{Plots/analysis/protonBG_nch_0_200_pT_60_65.eps}

867:

 \includegraphics[width=0.3\textwidth]{Plots/analysis/protonBG_nch_0_200_pT_90_95.eps}

877:

 \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{Plots/analysis/pp_proton_bg_fractions.eps}

878:

 \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{Plots/analysis/dAuAuAu_proton_bg_fractions.eps}

1:

 \chapter{Data Analysis}\label{sec:ch4}

3:

 This chapter describes the analysis procedure used to extract and

6:

 event selection used in the analysis. Electron identification

16:

 "Converter subtraction" analysis was performed which is described in

31:

 The other complication for the electron analysis is that we need

47:

 then that of the West arm and for this analysis we decided to use

74:

 Charm electron measurements. That is why analysis is using only

82:

 arrows is the acceptance region used in the analysis. The various

113:

 The same analysis can be performed for the Pad Chamber (PC1) dead

142:

 final dead/noise map used in the analysis included all the towers

147:

 towers in EMC that were removed from the analysis.\\

216:

 use tight vertex cuts for this analysis and only look at the

224:

 used in the analysis.}

292:

 analysis and required a precise tuning of the eID parameters.

355:

 cut for the analysis.

375:

 analysis.

476:

 loose ($\pm 3\sigma$) $E/p$ cut for the analysis

580:

 analysis.

585:

 The ERT trigger for Run02 was calculated for the $J/\psi$ analysis in

587:

 analysis uses only the EMC bit of the ERT trigger.  However, the RICH

617:

 analysis because we remove additional "bad" EMC towers (see

618:

 Fig.~\ref{fig:ch4.dead_emc}) as compared to the $J\Psi$ analysis, but

657:

 The major source of background for this analysis is a random

839:

 neglected in PHENIX electron analysis.

867:

 analysis we "throw" single electrons, generated by the

907:

 for real data analysis.

1151:

 approach as for $\pi^0$. This analysis was performed

1163:

 solve this problem ~\cite{ana148}, the charged hadron analysis group

1314:

  band (dashed) is used in the analysis.}

1389:

 The width of the bins in the current analysis are significant.  Thus,

1636:

 of systematic error in the current analysis. The treatment of

1639:

 done for the $Au+Au$ single electron analysis~\cite{ppg035,ana305} by

1723:

 an input for the analysis. Fig.~\ref{fig:ch4.direct_NLO} shows

1881:

 The common alternative to a cocktail-subtraction analysis is the

1882:

 convertor-subtraction analysis.  A converter subtraction analysis

1901:

 Cocktail prediction. The steps required for convertor analysis

1930:

 analysis and unfortunately for Run02 the total Converter run

1933:

 we can use this analysis for a consistency crosscheck of the Cocktail

1988:

 runs was obtained the same way as for Non-converter run analysis

2025:

 first principles. From previous $Au+Au$ analysis

2128:

 Cocktail subtraction analysis.

2141:

 subtraction analysis (circles) comparison to Cocktail subtracted

2154:

 results of two independent analysis are in good agreement with

2170:

 \section{Systematic error analysis}\label{sec:ch4.Systematics}

2172:

 Systematic error analysis have always been the most critical issue

2176:

 ingredient for current analysis as it uses the results of two

2208:

 analysis was done using the modified cuts and the ratio of the new

2245:

 Full analysis was repeated for each of the new cuts. The ratio of

2435:

 $\epsilon_{reco}(p_T)$ used in the analysis.}

2446:

 $\epsilon_{reco}(p_T)$ used in the analysis.}

2504:

 analysis~\cite{ana276} we obtain an estimate for the tracking

2506:

 an effect of tighter Z cut for the charged analysis ($|Z| < 50cm$)

2547:

 analysis~\cite{ana139} we have an estimate for $n0>1$ cut

2723:

 respect to the magnetic field. In our case this analysis seems

2725:

 in $\pp$ collisions. The conclusion from $\Au$ analysis is that

1:

 \section{Analysis}\label{sec:analysis}

216:

 which is a conventional condition, as used in the analysis of Higgs events